Oh cool, so we'll expect the next instalment by 2019?
Quote from: unironically being ironic on August 31, 2015, 10:28:11 AMOh cool, so we'll expect the next instalment by 2019?I do dislike her lack of punctuality.
I also dislike her lack of credible arguments and reluctance to engage in open discourse.
Quote from: unironically being ironic on August 31, 2015, 10:47:09 AMAt least you're honest.
TRIGGER WARNING:Verb please. I can't stand that word and people who use it left and right don't even understand what trigger means.Edit: And no, I'm not watching that because that girl is a literal cancer on feminism. Even at one event she said something along the lines of "I know what I'm talking about, you don't" or something stupid.Then someone quoted Tywin Lannister saying "Any man who must say, "I am the king" is no true king."Forget who said it on here, but they're right.
She makes some good points in her videos but most of the time it's just utter bullshit."You can kill women in RDR so it's sexist""You can kill women in GTA so it's sexist""You can fuck women in Mass Effect and Dragon Age so they must just be worthless fucktoys"like what the hell
sex sells
There is a reason all of her videos have the like bar and comments disabled too.
Quote from: unironically being ironic on August 31, 2015, 11:22:00 AMsex sellsThat's the problem, you stupid idiot. You honestly think feminists don't understand this? That's what we're fighting against.
Quote from: Luciana on August 31, 2015, 11:22:54 AMThere is a reason all of her videos have the like bar and comments disabled too.Let's not pretend that there isn't a group of people that will immediately respond with a strong backlash to anything she says, even if it was just a five second video of her staring at a camera. There are a minority of people that will expand upon their responses in an intelligent way, but most will just make fart noises and spam dislikes.I dislike Anita too, but this isn't exactly a paramount point in disregarding her.
There is going to be a strong backlash to anything popular around the web. The very fact though that you're trying to suppress it via turning off the comments, only shows that you're shutting out an entire audience, both support and haters.If you're going to be strong about what you say, you shouldn't be afraid of what comments will say, or a like and dislike bar. It's blatant censorship.
My main issue with these works are that it presumes upon "male entitlement" as the issue at hand; in general, I'd expand that to just "entitlement". Towards the end, especially, she makes a comment that male entitlement affects how women interact with each other. Quite frankly, it seems she's using men as a scapegoat for issues. If women weren't interested in rewarding skimpiness, films like Magic Mike wouldn't have been a box office hit (and even though its sequel, Magic Mike XXL, did poorly at the box office in comparison, it still made a large profit).Another is a comment she makes slightly earlier/later (depending on which section of discussion on male entitlement you predict that I'm speaking of) about "angry public temper tantrums from straight male players have occurred when role-playing games have forced them to interact with gay male characters". The issue with Cortez from Mass Effect 3, and similarly other minorities in Bioware games, is that they are themselves based solely around their "issue"; Cortez is just a gay guy, that's the limit of his development. Anders (Dragon Age II) will react negatively if you refuse him sex after building a significant amount of approval points (a contrast to her issue with reward points in video games, where the player is negatively affected by refusing sex). On the other side, characters who were actually developed past their sexuality are approved of or loved by the gaming community. Dorian (Dragon Age: Inquisition), despite the mixed views towards the game, is generally seen as a good character on his own grounds. Likewise, Arcade Gannon (Fallout: New Vegas) is also a gay character who is beloved and approved of by the gaming community.I dislike her views, not because they contrast with my own, but because I find it increasingly apparent that they are used to push an agenda and not to inform for the greater benefit of society. No person can be expected, or for that matter possibly be, unbiased on a subject; but her series reeks of bias, with minimal attempts to try and "straighten the curve" toward radical leftist principles.
Which is why the rest of my post asks her, and many other feminists, to clarify why this is such a moral grievance to women.
Quote from: Luciana on August 31, 2015, 11:30:04 AMThere is going to be a strong backlash to anything popular around the web. The very fact though that you're trying to suppress it via turning off the comments, only shows that you're shutting out an entire audience, both support and haters.If you're going to be strong about what you say, you shouldn't be afraid of what comments will say, or a like and dislike bar. It's blatant censorship.I agree. But that's so vastly irrelevant to the subject.