>"It is censorship plain and simple and censorship is one of the major evils our society is facing; you are part of the problem."Lolwut.
God you're so transparently biased.Sure, Destiny said some stupid shit too... but that's not fucking relevant, is it?When the people put their money in, it was a kickstarter. It may not be now but it was then.
I don't know if Destiny said anything that I completely disagreed with during that debate. He was pretty based throughout.
Verbatim response from Dahuterschuter when he brought this up on B.net when I asked why he believed it is immoral to fire someone for making controversial public statements:QuoteMorality and rights are separate issues.For instance, it's the developer's right to exercise discrimination in employment (unless they are discriminating against a protected minority), however it is immoral to levy repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western civilization, which are the most important areas of free speech.(Me:) Why [snip]?QuoteAdvancing and protecting Western Civilization is moral.Steps taken which would impede or oppose advancing and protecting Western Civilization are impeding or opposing that which is moral.Things that impede or oppose that which is moral are immoral.Levying repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western Civilization isimpeding or opposing that which is moral.Levying repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western Civilization is immoral.Very straightforward deduction.It's a pretty absurd and reductive response, but that's typical fare for him on the site. In arguments, he browbeats people with apparently reasonable, highly formal logical statements like this.
Morality and rights are separate issues.For instance, it's the developer's right to exercise discrimination in employment (unless they are discriminating against a protected minority), however it is immoral to levy repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western civilization, which are the most important areas of free speech.
Advancing and protecting Western Civilization is moral.Steps taken which would impede or oppose advancing and protecting Western Civilization are impeding or opposing that which is moral.Things that impede or oppose that which is moral are immoral.Levying repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western Civilization isimpeding or opposing that which is moral.Levying repercussions on someone for exercising their own right to free speech on political and social ideas which advance and protect Western Civilization is immoral.Very straightforward deduction.