It was an example. Jesus you're boring.
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 06:57:29 PMIt was an example. Jesus you're boring.I'm boring, because I don't enjoy playing boring games. Gotcha.
Quote from: LC on April 22, 2015, 06:53:06 PMI like the original gameObviously you don't.If you want to see it improved, why not just wait for the sequel?
I like the original game
Quote from: Verbatim on April 22, 2015, 06:54:50 PMQuote from: LC on April 22, 2015, 06:53:06 PMI like the original gameObviously you don't.If you want to see it improved, why not just wait for the sequel?You can like something and still recognize that it has faults and problems that can either be fixed or improved. Then you have games like Skyrim that provide a good foundation to be built upon (hence Bethesda easy to use modding tools and giving support for them), and had to be watered down due to under powered consoles. And no that's not PC elitism, that's a fact. There were a lot of things Bethesda wanted to do with Skyrim (namely the civil war) that they couldn't do because they had to have content parity with the 360 and PS3 for their vanilla version.In Skyrim's case, after about 100 installed mods I've got it to the point where I've happily spent over 300 hours on the same game. I would not be able to get this same mileage out of vanilla Skyrim or spending over.Seeing as how the average AAA game has about 10 hours of content in it I would have had to spend over $1800 to get the same amount of time out of them that I did Skyrim.
When you do your usual pissing and moaning about RTS games (they require thought to play, I know, that's a challenge for some people)
and then say that someone should pay out another $60 for a new game when they can just spice up game play for something they already own for free?
You can like something and still recognize that it has faults and problems that can either be fixed or improved.
I would not be able to get this same mileage out of vanilla Skyrim.
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 07:08:46 PMWhen you do your usual pissing and moaning about RTS games (they require thought to play, I know, that's a challenge for some people)Except I love games that require thought?No, RTS games require patience. And nothing else.
Oh my God you're actually serious.
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 07:53:41 PMOh my God you're actually serious.RTS games suck.Thank you for conveniently ignoring the rest of the post, too.
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 07:08:46 PMWhen you do your usual pissing and moaning about RTS games (they require thought to play, I know, that's a challenge for some people)Quoteand then say that someone should pay out another $60 for a new game when they can just spice up game play for something they already own for free?Nobody is telling you to pay $60 for a game. I haven't paid $60 for a game since 2006.
But you do that.
Games, especially AAA games like the Elder Scrolls I mentioned, usually cost $60. Again, it's an example but I guess you can't really catch on.
There are games that are worth the $60 I pay up front
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 08:55:33 PMThere are games that are worth the $60 I pay up front I really don't think there are any of those.
What video games do you play?*sips tea*
Quote from: Batch on April 22, 2015, 09:02:50 PMWhat video games do you play?*sips tea*Older ones.
Then you really do not pay attention, or your taste in games is very, very pitifully small.
No no no, you don't get to be critical and not give us a proper answer, come on now.*sips tea*
Quote from: Batch on April 22, 2015, 09:12:21 PMNo no no, you don't get to be critical and not give us a proper answer, come on now.*sips tea*That is a proper answer. I don't know what the fuck else you're asking. You're asking what video games I play--I play "retro" games, usually. Did you mean to ask which games I play? I don't really care to list a whole ton of them out to you if I don't have a good reason.
Quote from: Voro 'Cinotai on April 22, 2015, 09:01:04 PMThen you really do not pay attention, or your taste in games is very, very pitifully small.You realize games have only been $60 since the seventh generation, right?
But not worth $60.
So you dont like new games
Why is it your life mission to say otherwise? Like I know you can say 'opinion' but the general consensus is that people know how to adapt and modify their gaming experiences. If you sir, like the ways of old and wish to stay that way, then that's fine. But the crusade you're on doesn't really seem worth it.
>opinionsCare to state why?
The purpose of mods
