There's a difference between a game that's been stylized and a game that just doesn't look good.

That's what I was saying. If you don't think a game looks good, that's fine. But don't blame that on the graphics. Blame that on the game not looking good. There is a difference.

Tbh graphics aren't everything but I'm more inclined to approach  a prettier looking game than an ugly one. Wether or not I enjoy it more is something else.

A lot of people are getting hung up on Verbs graphics comment. I'm pretty sure all he's saying is graphics don't make a game good or bad. A game can be beautiful and still be a shit game, or an ugly game can be fun.

for example Iook at uncharted. Sure light can shine through drakes ear cartilage, and gravel realistically slides down hills. That doesn't automatically make it a good game. Is it a positive feature? Sure but if the game was garbage nobody would care if it had pretty graphics. On the other hand dark souls 3 graphics are nothing to write home about, it doesn't do anything groundbreaking graphically and I've even found some untextured rocks and shitty looking foliage (I assume unfinished) but I still think it's an amazing game.

Quote from: Winy on May 19, 2016, 11:59:41 AM

There's a difference between a game that's been stylized and a game that just doesn't look good.

That's what I was saying. If you don't think a game looks good, that's fine. But don't blame that on the graphics. Blame that on the game not looking good. There is a difference.

Oh, no. I agree, sorry for misunderstanding.

Excessive brand loyalty and accusations of 'not being a true fan'. I got this a lot from a friend when I mentioned that I didn't like Halo 4.

I enjoyed playing halo and call of duty.

lol no you didn't you idort

Not quite sure what an idort is, but you have a point.

"idort" is an ancient memeword that describes people who can't pick between two gaming-related things

it just comes from a dumb comic

yeah that one