Uhh, I could posit hypotheticals that make any nonsensical opinion seem valid. That's a shit way to think.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:15:32 PMUhh, I could posit hypotheticals that make any nonsensical opinion seem valid. That's a shit way to think.literally how
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 04:18:05 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:15:32 PMUhh, I could posit hypotheticals that make any nonsensical opinion seem valid. That's a shit way to think.literally howHow is it a bad way to think?
Quote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:18:41 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 04:18:05 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:15:32 PMUhh, I could posit hypotheticals that make any nonsensical opinion seem valid. That's a shit way to think.literally howHow is it a bad way to think?how is it a bad way to thinkand no, you can't just posit any hypothetical--it has to actually work, and make senselike mine
I have an excellent theory on why the Nazis were correct. Hypotheticals are only worth discussing if they planned to be implemented. I don't see anyone putting your hypothetical in to practice.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:22:42 PMI have an excellent theory on why the Nazis were correct. Hypotheticals are only worth discussing if they planned to be implemented. I don't see anyone putting your hypothetical in to practice.i mean, i only gave like thirty million examples in this one threadincluding myself--i'd make a game that is designed to be run on shitty hardware just to prove my own point
That kinda skews the whole argument. "No one would willing eat dog shit.""Herp derp, I'm eating shit rn just to prove my point."
Quote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:29:09 PMThat kinda skews the whole argument. "No one would willing eat dog shit.""Herp derp, I'm eating shit rn just to prove my point."I mean, I wouldn't have to eat dogshit to prove that some people would eat it. There's far crazier shit on the Internet.How would that skew the argument anyway? Do you just not like being proved wrong?
It's just objectively better hardware. End of story.
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 04:33:49 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:29:09 PMThat kinda skews the whole argument. "No one would willing eat dog shit.""Herp derp, I'm eating shit rn just to prove my point."I mean, I wouldn't have to eat dogshit to prove that some people would eat it. There's far crazier shit on the Internet.How would that skew the argument anyway? Do you just not like being proved wrong?Doing something you wouldn't normally do, specifically to prove a point, isn't an accurate way to defend your argument.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 05:35:49 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 04:33:49 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:29:09 PMThat kinda skews the whole argument. "No one would willing eat dog shit.""Herp derp, I'm eating shit rn just to prove my point."I mean, I wouldn't have to eat dogshit to prove that some people would eat it. There's far crazier shit on the Internet.How would that skew the argument anyway? Do you just not like being proved wrong?Doing something you wouldn't normally do, specifically to prove a point, isn't an accurate way to defend your argument.In general, I can kinda see what you mean, but in this specific case, why not?
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:37:46 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 05:35:49 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 04:33:49 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on April 28, 2017, 04:29:09 PMThat kinda skews the whole argument. "No one would willing eat dog shit.""Herp derp, I'm eating shit rn just to prove my point."I mean, I wouldn't have to eat dogshit to prove that some people would eat it. There's far crazier shit on the Internet.How would that skew the argument anyway? Do you just not like being proved wrong?Doing something you wouldn't normally do, specifically to prove a point, isn't an accurate way to defend your argument.In general, I can kinda see what you mean, but in this specific case, why not?If you never had this argument would you build a game specifically for inferior hardware?
Probably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.Not sure that's correct. People disagree with factually correct information all the time.
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed textures
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything else
having more detailed textures
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailed
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively better
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:24:55 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:22:33 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailedwhyBecause it looks better. Just like putting the settings on ultra instead of very low.
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:22:33 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailedwhy
Quote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:27:07 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:26:50 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:24:55 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:22:33 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailedwhyBecause it looks better. Just like putting the settings on ultra instead of very low.why does it look betterYouTubeYou tell me
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:26:50 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:24:55 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:22:33 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailedwhyBecause it looks better. Just like putting the settings on ultra instead of very low.why does it look better
Quote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:44:35 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:27:07 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:26:50 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:24:55 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:22:33 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:20:39 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 06:19:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 06:07:29 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:52:48 PMQuote from: Verbatim on April 28, 2017, 05:49:57 PMQuote from: challengerX on April 28, 2017, 05:44:59 PMProbably because it's not an opinion and it's a fact?If it were a fact, then I couldn't possibly disagree with it.You disagree with a lot of facts.give me one reason to believe that PC graphics are objectively better than anything elseQuotehaving more detailed texturesi may like more detailed textures, but why is that objectively betterMore detailed > less detailedwhyBecause it looks better. Just like putting the settings on ultra instead of very low.why does it look betterYouTubeYou tell mei already agree that more detail is better, because that's my personal tastewhat i'm not understanding is how it's objectively betterwhich means that you believe that anyone who prefers less detail is wrong