Quote from: Verbatim on November 02, 2015, 06:03:58 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on November 02, 2015, 06:02:58 PMThat's not what 2.5D means. 2.5D means that it's 3D rendering but gameplay is restricted to a two-dimensional plane. Street Fighter IV is 2.5D; ALBW uses 2.5D and 3D gameplay.all games are restricted to a two-dimensional plane thoughThat's a bit pedantic. Two-dimensional gameplay means that your movement options are restricted left-right, whereas 3D uses compass directions (front-right-back-left, with between like front-right and back-left in most games since the 5th gen)
Quote from: Prime Megaten on November 02, 2015, 06:02:58 PMThat's not what 2.5D means. 2.5D means that it's 3D rendering but gameplay is restricted to a two-dimensional plane. Street Fighter IV is 2.5D; ALBW uses 2.5D and 3D gameplay.all games are restricted to a two-dimensional plane though
That's not what 2.5D means. 2.5D means that it's 3D rendering but gameplay is restricted to a two-dimensional plane. Street Fighter IV is 2.5D; ALBW uses 2.5D and 3D gameplay.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on November 02, 2015, 06:06:14 PMQuote from: Verbatim on November 02, 2015, 06:03:58 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on November 02, 2015, 06:02:58 PMThat's not what 2.5D means. 2.5D means that it's 3D rendering but gameplay is restricted to a two-dimensional plane. Street Fighter IV is 2.5D; ALBW uses 2.5D and 3D gameplay.all games are restricted to a two-dimensional plane thoughThat's a bit pedantic. Two-dimensional gameplay means that your movement options are restricted left-right, whereas 3D uses compass directions (front-right-back-left, with between like front-right and back-left in most games since the 5th gen)i'm confusedso would that make the original LoZ 3D?... it uses compass directions; you're not restricted to moving left or rightseems kinda silly, unless i'm misunderstanding
3D movement and 3D rendering, silly. The former is the difference between 2.5D and 3D gameplay since they both have 3D rendering. Hell, I even went back and Googled "3D Zelda" and it brought me to an interview with Aonuma. http://kotaku.com/5500680/2d-zelda-games-vs-3d-zelda-gamesHe seems to define it simply by how the game is rendered; makes sense not to bother with directional inputs since there's never really been a 2.5D Zelda.And I also checked on that; the 2.5D gameplay is literally limited to the wall-painting gimmick. In all other instances it plays 3D. So yeah, 3D game.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on November 02, 2015, 06:23:48 PM3D movement and 3D rendering, silly. The former is the difference between 2.5D and 3D gameplay since they both have 3D rendering. Hell, I even went back and Googled "3D Zelda" and it brought me to an interview with Aonuma. http://kotaku.com/5500680/2d-zelda-games-vs-3d-zelda-gamesHe seems to define it simply by how the game is rendered; makes sense not to bother with directional inputs since there's never really been a 2.5D Zelda.And I also checked on that; the 2.5D gameplay is literally limited to the wall-painting gimmick. In all other instances it plays 3D. So yeah, 3D game.eh, fair enoughstill--in every discussion i've ever had about 3D zelda games, games that didn't have the camera situated behind link's head were not included--including ALBW would be like including Phantom Hourglass or Spirit Tracks.it just kinda muddies the water, i thinkcreates confusion
Metal Gear. I'm okay with spinoffs like Rising and Acid though. Just let Snake die already.
Quote from: Big Boss on November 02, 2015, 07:02:19 PMMetal Gear. I'm okay with spinoffs like Rising and Acid though. Just let Snake die already.He's been dead since MGS4 back in 2008. Unless you mean Big Boss. MGS V was his last game as well.
They're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"
Quote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:08:48 PMThey're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"what a great sendoff "its like reach all over again!"
Quote from: True Turquoise on November 02, 2015, 07:12:51 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:08:48 PMThey're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"what a great sendoff "its like reach all over again!"um reach was objectively the best halosoi'm rightand you're wrongwhich means I wingg no re
Quote from: Psyduck on November 02, 2015, 07:18:31 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on November 02, 2015, 07:12:51 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:08:48 PMThey're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"what a great sendoff "its like reach all over again!"um reach was objectively the best halosoi'm rightand you're wrongwhich means I wingg no rekys
but seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.
Quote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:27:48 PMbut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.If you liked no map control, Call of Halo, and random care package dropsthen yesBut I suspect most people's logic is "no armor lock/bloom so it's better", which is a good thing yes, but it still had much more going against it.
Quote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:31:44 PMQuote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:27:48 PMbut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.If you liked no map control, Call of Halo, and random care package dropsthen yesBut I suspect most people's logic is "no armor lock/bloom so it's better", which is a good thing yes, but it still had much more going against it.Nope, I cared for the story.The multiplayer was shit, and I forgot about it.
Quote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:32:19 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:31:44 PMQuote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:27:48 PMbut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.If you liked no map control, Call of Halo, and random care package dropsthen yesBut I suspect most people's logic is "no armor lock/bloom so it's better", which is a good thing yes, but it still had much more going against it.Nope, I cared for the story.The multiplayer was shit, and I forgot about it.The multiplayer which is the longevity of it, was horrible. So that's what I was talking about.
Quote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:15:42 PMSonic. He's just a dead horse.I will knock you the fuck out
Sonic. He's just a dead horse.
Quote from: Psyduck on November 02, 2015, 07:18:31 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on November 02, 2015, 07:12:51 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:08:48 PMThey're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"what a great sendoff "its like reach all over again!"um reach was objectively the best halosoi'm rightand you're wrongwhich means I wingg no reHalo 4 was objectively the best Halo. It set the benchmark for modern FPS gaming.huehuehuebut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.
Quote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:27:48 PMQuote from: Psyduck on November 02, 2015, 07:18:31 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on November 02, 2015, 07:12:51 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:08:48 PMThey're not making anymore last I checked.And Kojima kept saying "it's da rast one, I promisssu"what a great sendoff "its like reach all over again!"um reach was objectively the best halosoi'm rightand you're wrongwhich means I wingg no reHalo 4 was objectively the best Halo. It set the benchmark for modern FPS gaming.huehuehuebut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.um you seeI could agree with you, but then I'd have to kill myself.
Quote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:33:17 PMQuote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:32:19 PMQuote from: Luciana on November 02, 2015, 07:31:44 PMQuote from: 031 Exuberant Witness on November 02, 2015, 07:27:48 PMbut seriously though, Halo 4 was better than Reach.If you liked no map control, Call of Halo, and random care package dropsthen yesBut I suspect most people's logic is "no armor lock/bloom so it's better", which is a good thing yes, but it still had much more going against it.Nope, I cared for the story.The multiplayer was shit, and I forgot about it.The multiplayer which is the longevity of it, was horrible. So that's what I was talking about.And I already agreed. Jeez, I'm in it for the universe, Halo 4 did good on that, but did horribly in the multiplayer department. So I eventually just reverted back to Halo 3, but occasionally went back to 4 just to play the campaign.
Series that need to die
