8% less power consumption compared to previous model10% lighter HDD cover is same matte finish as the rest of the body
I'm not entirely sure how you could make a slimmer PS4, I mean the PS3 sure as shit needed one because that was the size of a watercooler but it's not all that big <.<
I want that matte black HDD cover.Fuck piano black.
now they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3.
Quote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:47:45 AMnow they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3. they've already said that's will never happen. Something along the lines of wanted to focus their efforts on moving forward rather than focusing on the past
Quote from: Tyger on June 22, 2015, 10:54:10 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:47:45 AMnow they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3. they've already said that's will never happen. Something along the lines of wanted to focus their efforts on moving forward rather than focusing on the pastthat's unfortunate. i'm really disappointed with my PS4 so far, but if I could play my PS3 games on it I would certainly use it more. i guess it makes sense, though; hopefully Sony has some good stuff waiting in the future.
Quote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:57:31 AMQuote from: Tyger on June 22, 2015, 10:54:10 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:47:45 AMnow they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3. they've already said that's will never happen. Something along the lines of wanted to focus their efforts on moving forward rather than focusing on the pastthat's unfortunate. i'm really disappointed with my PS4 so far, but if I could play my PS3 games on it I would certainly use it more. i guess it makes sense, though; hopefully Sony has some good stuff waiting in the future.Emulation for the PS3 is basically impossible anyway (hyperbole, kinda). the CELL architecture of the PS3 is a big reason it won't happen. Emulation of consoles that use less ass-backwards architectures than CELL is already difficult as it is.
Quote from: Lemon on June 22, 2015, 11:09:20 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:57:31 AMQuote from: Tyger on June 22, 2015, 10:54:10 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:47:45 AMnow they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3. they've already said that's will never happen. Something along the lines of wanted to focus their efforts on moving forward rather than focusing on the pastthat's unfortunate. i'm really disappointed with my PS4 so far, but if I could play my PS3 games on it I would certainly use it more. i guess it makes sense, though; hopefully Sony has some good stuff waiting in the future.Emulation for the PS3 is basically impossible anyway (hyperbole, kinda). the CELL architecture of the PS3 is a big reason it won't happen. Emulation of consoles that use less ass-backwards architectures than CELL is already difficult as it is.ah that's a shame... i just hope my PS3 lasts as long as my PS2 has (which is still functioning(ish) today!). i have some of my favorite games on PS3.does the PS4 also used CELL architecture?
Quote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 11:24:31 AMQuote from: Lemon on June 22, 2015, 11:09:20 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:57:31 AMQuote from: Tyger on June 22, 2015, 10:54:10 AMQuote from: Five on June 22, 2015, 10:47:45 AMnow they need to make a new model w/ some form of backwards compatibility, even if it's just a download from the PSN store when you insert the PS3 disc.sony pls, unlike the ps4 there are actually games for the ps3. they've already said that's will never happen. Something along the lines of wanted to focus their efforts on moving forward rather than focusing on the pastthat's unfortunate. i'm really disappointed with my PS4 so far, but if I could play my PS3 games on it I would certainly use it more. i guess it makes sense, though; hopefully Sony has some good stuff waiting in the future.Emulation for the PS3 is basically impossible anyway (hyperbole, kinda). the CELL architecture of the PS3 is a big reason it won't happen. Emulation of consoles that use less ass-backwards architectures than CELL is already difficult as it is.ah that's a shame... i just hope my PS3 lasts as long as my PS2 has (which is still functioning(ish) today!). i have some of my favorite games on PS3.does the PS4 also used CELL architecture?If PS4 used CELL we'd definitely get backwards compatibility.The PS4 uses the x86 architecture that PCs use (Xbone also uses x86).Development of games early in the PS3's cycle was insanely hard because of how ridiculously complex CELL is. There were still games later in its cycle that were super wonky because the PS3 was difficult to develop for - just look at Skyrim and how fucked that was on PS3.So trying to emulate CELL on the PS4 is pretty much never going to happen without hiring meth riddled geniuses to do it.
That article neglected to mention that it's also available with a 1TB hard drive
They could at least give a discount to those who own a PS4 already...
Does anyone actually care about power consumption or weight anymore?