I heavily enjoyed it myself, sure it's not Metal Gear, but damn it was some spicey hack and slash

It's an okay game I guess. It's not a good MG game though.

Never played it, but the friends I know irl that have played it say it's meh. Watches one of them play it once and it it seemed alright.

The story was better than whatever MGS V tried to pass. The combat and music were amazing though, who thinks it's a bad game?

Verb

I don't think Eli liked it that much


I loved it, it took the MGS silliness and became Metal Gear Anime: The Videogame

Quote from: Luciana on January 28, 2016, 05:26:37 PM

Quote from: Ender on January 28, 2016, 05:17:51 PM

Never played it, but the friends I know irl that have played it say it's meh. Watches one of them play it once and it it seemed alright.

The combat, which is the main focus of it all, is really good.

I don't mean this in a rude way, but I'm bad at phrasing things so it might seem that way

Spoiler

, but this thread seems hypocritical if you compare it to your guy's opinion on mgsv

imo I believe the main focus of V is the gameplay, which it does very well, and it lacks in the story- the one thing I believe it really isn't trying to accomplish.

And ITT your all saying it's okay mgr had a bad story because it was more focused on the fighting.

just a thought

also sorry for any typos or anything like that, I'm on my phone and multitasking.

Because MGR wasn't trying to be a Solid game, it was it's own action focused spinoff, set in the MGS universe years after 4. If it was set in between 2 and 4 like it was originally supposed to be then we'd care a lot more about the story, and see how it fits in but since it's set in the future it doesn't really matter.

I consider it to be my first Metal Gear game, and I loved it. Everything was great imo.

Neither the gameplay nor the story are very good, but I'm not going to lie and say I didn't enjoy the game. It has an irresistible charm to it. The music is pretty "crawling in my skin" so obviously I enjoyed it.

Greater emphasis on stealth mechanics would've been greatly appreciated considering the game, for some reason, absolutely MUST include those sections in it. Controls didn't feel very responsive and probably could've used some work, too. The game is also unbelievably easy.

If it wasn't such a dumb action game I'd probably go analyse it a bit more thematically speaking but I know there's nothing underneath the surface. This game came from the same fucks who created Bayonetta, so. . .

And of course, the memes, Jack.

Never played it, but the friends I know irl that have played it say it's meh. Watches one of them play it once and it it seemed alright.

I'd say it's worth getting for like 15 dollars because of the gameplay.

News for you. It's not a Solid game. They said that from the get go. The game isn't bad because of what you personally wished was in it. The objectives they set out to do were done by leaps and bounds. They rescued what was otherwise a dead project.

The butthurt is real. And for no reason, considering I said I actually liked the game.

If the game is going to include stealth sections, and it executes them poorly, what do you expect me to say? The stealth sections are shoehorned in. Either take them out or improve them. Personally, I think improving them would provide enough gameplay variation to make it far more interesting.

The controls were fine, what? The only thing I disliked was the block/parry mechanic, but the game can be challenging on the hardest of difficulties.

The controls aren't that great. They're pretty dumb (in the sense that they're easy to use) and the aiming of weapons does not feel responsive in the slightest. And don't get me started on the camera.

I played and beat the game on the hardest difficulty in a day, so I don't really think it was all that difficult...

You can completely skip the stealth mechanics last I checked

i don't like this bad mechanic so i'm going to skip over it entirely

10/10 game of the year?...

Oh boy, I love that game

Soundtrack was ace