I have the same thoughts. It's my favorite of the trilogy. Did you play Andromeda? It felt like a chore beating that game. I liked the lore they set up. But compared to the others it felt like it was wandering around big areas with lazy mission design and not much story.
Are you gonna do all the Mass Defects including Andromeda?
>you now remember Teh Illusive Man
me2 best of the seriesi'm glad you brought up cerberus being in me1. i replayed me1 a few months ago and i didn't realize cerberus was established before me2 til then. like you said they were just sidequests but it really was an "oh shit" moment to me
best mass effect game
>Calling ME2 "filler"
I feel like we should discuss how bad the cover art isLike, it's just Shepard, Miranda and Thane doing an action pose. Doesn't really instill any sense of sci fi wonder in me at all.
Quote from: Big Boss on October 02, 2017, 08:29:42 AMI feel like we should discuss how bad the cover art isLike, it's just Shepard, Miranda and Thane doing an action pose. Doesn't really instill any sense of sci fi wonder in me at all.It does reflect the change in the series itself at that point, though. ME1 was closer to Star Trek, which used the crew as a vehicle to explore different ideas, themes, and fueling the sense of discovery. ME2 is closer to the J.J. Abrams films, which focus more on the characters themselves. It's a smaller, more focused game and the cover reflects that by making the characters the primary component of it.SpoilerIt does suck tho
Quote from: Me on October 02, 2017, 06:43:26 PMQuote from: Big Boss on October 02, 2017, 08:29:42 AMI feel like we should discuss how bad the cover art isLike, it's just Shepard, Miranda and Thane doing an action pose. Doesn't really instill any sense of sci fi wonder in me at all.It does reflect the change in the series itself at that point, though. ME1 was closer to Star Trek, which used the crew as a vehicle to explore different ideas, themes, and fueling the sense of discovery. ME2 is closer to the J.J. Abrams films, which focus more on the characters themselves. It's a smaller, more focused game and the cover reflects that by making the characters the primary component of it.SpoilerIt does suck thoYou'd think for a game that focuses so much on squad building, they'd put more than two on there
Quote from: Big Boss on October 02, 2017, 06:57:48 PMQuote from: Me on October 02, 2017, 06:43:26 PMQuote from: Big Boss on October 02, 2017, 08:29:42 AMI feel like we should discuss how bad the cover art isLike, it's just Shepard, Miranda and Thane doing an action pose. Doesn't really instill any sense of sci fi wonder in me at all.It does reflect the change in the series itself at that point, though. ME1 was closer to Star Trek, which used the crew as a vehicle to explore different ideas, themes, and fueling the sense of discovery. ME2 is closer to the J.J. Abrams films, which focus more on the characters themselves. It's a smaller, more focused game and the cover reflects that by making the characters the primary component of it.SpoilerIt does suck thoYou'd think for a game that focuses so much on squad building, they'd put more than two on thereYou work in squads of three, and showing off a larger roster would give it an inaccurate larger-scale feeling.
I always wanted to get into Mass Effect but couldn't get into the gameplay. Same with Witcher.