Whether you like it or not Verb, PC does have a wider variety of games
I just argue with obvious logic
there is a much larger number of games
They play at lower frame rates and lower resolutions
Now you can say it sucks all you want, but I'll always be here to tell you why you're wrong.
Lastly the 'power' of a console matters (and pc aswell) because like I just demonstrated it gives the devs more flexibility to create a game really worth playing, may it be the ability to churn out nice graphics or a good framerate.
Having an argument with Verb is difficult when he just cuts up your argument so it clearly doesnt make sense, then says what he just did with it doesnt make sense.Like dude put some effort in I addressed all your points and you gave me this drab to run on. Weak.
It's a perception in your head. What you think is nice, I may think is terrible. It's ALL subjective.
Reading through this thread and I want to hurt myself.In 2016, the only thing consoles have over PCs is accessibility
Quote from: MemesAreFunny69 on June 07, 2016, 07:12:45 PMReading through this thread and I want to hurt myself.In 2016, the only thing consoles have over PCs is accessibilityAnd Super Metroid.Shit game.Fuck I can't quote on tapatalk forget this happened
Quote from: Batch on June 07, 2016, 06:47:44 PMHaving an argument with Verb is difficult when he just cuts up your argument so it clearly doesnt make sense, then says what he just did with it doesnt make sense.Like dude put some effort in I addressed all your points and you gave me this drab to run on. Weak.I responded to every single one of your shit points. I don't "cut it up" so that it doesn't make sense--you do that well enough on your own with your ridiculous syntax and inability to type a sensible thought. I cut up arguments because it's organized. This way, I can give a short response to each one of your points individually, instead of having to type up a fucking essay.I refuted all of your points, and you haven't responded.
Which is irrelevant. Which is my entire fucking point.Quality > Quantity.If PC has 3,000,000,000 games to console's 30,000, it doesn't matter if all 3B of those games suck.
I don't give a fuck about "nice graphics" or a "good framerate".
There is no such thing as "nice" graphics. There is no such thing as "good" frame rates.
Shit game.
higher amount of games brings along the higher likelihood of a good game.
well if its the same game on PC then lets take a realistic pallette and give it shitty graphics, thats not what the dev intended
Okay then, a lot of people do and is usually the breaking point between someone buying a console or PC
Incorrect. I will give you examples later on when Im not on mobile of games with bad graphics and bad framerates, and its not because the dev wanted it that way, its because its a shit game.
This also trumps half the things you've said.
I prefer to play on PC, but if someone prefers consoles, it's completely fine. It's really just personal preference. There is no objectively better platform.Also Verb, why do you dislike modding so much?
Quote from: Stroud on June 07, 2016, 08:33:16 PMI prefer to play on PC, but if someone prefers consoles, it's completely fine. It's really just personal preference. There is no objectively better platform.Also Verb, why do you dislike modding so much?Because hur dur thats not what the devs wanted but its completely fine to boycott them if they do something you dont like.
guys, this is a WILD new idea, but, when verb goes off on weird tangents like this, i think we should either completely ignore it or just meme him to death, because clearly logic doesnt work
You made this thread on purpose you little observationist!
Quote from: True Turquoise on June 07, 2016, 09:54:33 PMYou made this thread on purpose you little observationist!Fixed
Oh, well then. If the reason was because mods have the potential to ruin your game (which occurs often for those who don't know what they're doing), then I could see why he doesn't like them. But really, because it's not how they intended for the game to be? Bethesda has released modding tools (the G.E.C.K. for Fallout games) to the general public for nearly all their games. Plus, modding brings the community together and encourages creativity; it gets the community involved.
I don't care. In my opinion, the only people who are at liberty to change/add shit to the game are the developers. Everyone else should leave the game alone or make their own game. It's like pissing in a museum.If the developer supports it, like Bethesda does, that's fine, but I still don't agree with it. Would you want to be friends with someone who's okay with you pissing all over his house? I sure wouldn't.
The analogies you offer don't make sense simply because the creator encourages you to do so. Pissing in the museum would be fine if the owners encourage you to do it as well, which is exactly what Bethesda is doing.
Quote from: Stroud on June 07, 2016, 08:46:43 PMOh, well then. If the reason was because mods have the potential to ruin your game (which occurs often for those who don't know what they're doing), then I could see why he doesn't like them. But really, because it's not how they intended for the game to be? Bethesda has released modding tools (the G.E.C.K. for Fallout games) to the general public for nearly all their games. Plus, modding brings the community together and encourages creativity; it gets the community involved. I don't care. In my opinion, the only people who are at liberty to change/add shit to the game are the developers. Everyone else should leave the game alone or make their own game. It's like pissing in a museum.If the developer supports it, like Bethesda does, that's fine, but I still don't agree with it. Would you want to be friends with someone who's okay with you pissing all over his house? I sure wouldn't."But everyone has their own copy of the game."And you can do whatever you want. By all means, mod. I just don't agree with it, and I never will.
Quote from: Verbatim on June 07, 2016, 03:12:15 PM>PS2 for $20 at a flea marketFind me a more cost efficient PC that can run any game at optimal settings.It's 2016 now. I'm pretty sure that even the most potato of potato PCs these days can run 10+ year old PS2 level games. If you have a decent mobo, you may even be able to run them just by using on-board video. You can also build a PC of comparable or better power to a modern console for roughly the same price.To address your other point: Unless you were referring to Nintendo, X1/PS4 having "better" games than PC is bullshit and you know it. Most AAA titles these days are multiplatform, and X1/PS4 still don't exactly have any real killer apps as of yet. Sure, Sony has plenty of exclusives, but those are mostly appealing for people who were already fans of Sony. Maybe one or two tops is good enough to justify me spending $300+ on a console, which isn't nearly enough, IMHO. With PC, you effectively get 90% of the same games, a shitload more exclusives, infinitely more longevity (no issues of "backwards compatibility"), and freedom with what you can do with those games (I know you don't like it, but mods are a pretty huge upside to PC gaming.) Not to mention you don't have to pay for XBL/whatever the fuck Sony uses now. The only thing you have to pay to play online is your ISP.I'm sorry, but PC is just objectively better than X1/PS4. I'm not going to compare Nintendo, because Nintendo is in it's own league and can't really be compared due to it being Nintendo and hosting completely different genres and appealing to completely different demographics than what is typical of other platforms.
>PS2 for $20 at a flea marketFind me a more cost efficient PC that can run any game at optimal settings.
Let us calmly and politel- Oh fuck it.
