You really expect them to go the extra mile with the first one?  How else will they sell you the sequel?

How does one split screen a PC?

Who the fuck actually uses split screen in this day and age, especially on PC?

Fuck off, ya only child. I always split screened Halo with my bro.

Splitscreen on consoles is great, splitscreen on PC is a pointless clusterfuck. Kind of a non-issue there.

As for Y-wings, aren't they just bomber X-wings?

Yeah, they're slow as fuck and are only used to bomb stuff. They filled a role in space battles, but kinda sucked in ground maps.

Also going to add in that the AT-AT was only on two maps ever, both of which were corridor maps so you would realistically only be moving in one direction anyway.

And if the AT-AT even made it to the other side, the Empire probably already had the CPs taken so there were no enemies there. I dunno why people talk it up like it was the best feature in the game.

Who the fuck actually uses split screen in this day and age, especially on PC?

people with friends irl

Quote from: LC on July 14, 2015, 09:41:53 PM

Also going to add in that the AT-AT was only on two maps ever, both of which were corridor maps so you would realistically only be moving in one direction anyway.

And if the AT-AT even made it to the other side, the Empire probably already had the CPs taken so there were no enemies there. I dunno why people talk it up like it was the best feature in the game.

Maybe the reason why people are mad about it is simply because it's another piece of content that's being removed. A game from 2004 or 5 has more content than this game which is just sad. 

They're not even doing battlefield: Star Wars skin edition. There's less content here than BF4. The Battlefront name is pretty much only there because they knew that attaching it to an established series would give it attention.

And the sad thing is people will buy into this and just show DICE/EA that it's okay to take established series and take a giant dump on them.

Why would you ever want to split screen on a PC?

I don't understand why you're saying the content is being removed. It was never in this game.

Yes using the word "removed" doesn't fit but the point though is that they're not including content in the newer game when the past games had them since the start. They're going to be charging full price for a game that's launching with less content than what Battlefront 2 did with and that's not right at all. If they do include space battles as a DLC it's most likely going to be a paid one or launch with shit for maps and the rest are going to be a charged DLC. It seems like they're not including content to either charge it as a future DLC or to make sure this game doesn't kill off Battlefield. 

And it's perectly fine to not include extraneous stuff like an AT-AT.

How is having less content fine? It would be one thing if this was going to be the first Battlefront to have it and then they scarped it. But it's completely something else when we had the ability to control them since the first game and now it's just one less thing we have content wise.

but this seems like just a dumb thing to get upset about.

If it was this and a few other minor things not making it there wouldn't be much to get upset over but that isn't the case. This is just one more thing on top of other big ones that aren't making it in this game. People are already mad about having space battles and the clone wars not being including in this. When you have another form of content not being included that feeds to the fire no matter how small it is.