Quote from: Lemsip on December 17, 2015, 01:28:16 PMYou shouldn't think that sexualization in video games is wrong. Because it isn't.It is, though. You should think that it is, because it is.QuoteNo doubt you'll reply saying I'm wrong thoughThat's how arguments work, dipshit.
You shouldn't think that sexualization in video games is wrong. Because it isn't.
No doubt you'll reply saying I'm wrong though
I'm not a good samaritan because I can go do that.
You and others constantly say "there's nothing we can really change about that, so there's no point just talking about it on the Internet".
It does. It's an over exaggeration and taking a totally innocent aspect of something and demonizing it.
Saving them from what? Being born into a loving family?
Actually, you fascist, it's the opposite of free speech. You're telling people how to think and how to talk, and what to say.
Keeps it organized.
>he thinks this is somehow a valid point he's making
Well seeing how I wouldn't just willingly rape a girl to prevent people from being born.
You're saying you're a feminist when you don't give a shit about real women's issues, though. That was the analogy.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Ah, so you admit that feminist logic is crazy.
Sorry, I don't join death cults.
Except you're telling people how to think. Which kebabs if you had power you'd enforce these things. Which means you're a fascist.
Just read this out loud to a friend of yours or something. Or in public.
If it was actual rape? I would probably do it.
No, you don't.
You just admitted it though. You admitted to demonizing something completely harmless.
Just not religious.
You would. If you could make everybody an antinatalist, you would definitely do it.
There is.
I said friend or in public, not close family.
To actually prevent death, not protect babies from being born.
I mean, in your mind, you THINK you're stopping suffering, but it's not comparable. You can't willingly put someone through that because one of those babies MIGHT get raped. Mathematically, it's just not sound.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
But be honest. If you could, you would.
There's something wrong with telling how to think, yes.
What do they say?
I mean try and look at what your "philosophy" (whatever you want to call it) from an outside perspective.
Alternatively, people could just use condoms and stop having so many babies.
hahah got you now
snippet of my argumeent
sentence of a provocative nature
EHHEHHEH
Quotehahah got you nowno you are wrong Quotesnippet of my argumeentobjectively we're subjectively discussing semantics here.Quotesentence of a provocative naturethis is just an opinionQuoteEHHEHHEHre read my OP and then come back to me.
Quoteno you are wrong
no you are wrong
Quoteobjectively we're subjectively discussing semantics here.
objectively we're subjectively discussing semantics here.
Quotethis is just an opinion
this is just an opinion
God you've come full circle right back to this. You were doing well being....not retarded for most of the year.
Quote from: Jocephalopod on December 17, 2015, 04:35:13 PMQuotehahah got you nowno you are wrong Quotesnippet of my argumeentobjectively we're subjectively discussing semantics here.Quotesentence of a provocative naturethis is just an opinionQuoteEHHEHHEHre read my OP and then come back to me.QuoteQuoteno you are wrongum don't think so buddy, you are in fact wrong QuoteQuoteobjectively we're subjectively discussing semantics here.objectively i'd have to agree with you but subjectively i can't as your opinions are objective. btw semantics are subjective and thus not real.QuoteQuotethis is just an opiniononce again, give me some empirical evidence rather than these subjective semantic objectives please re read my previous argument before telling me to reread my previous argument
Quoteobjectively i'd have to agree with you but subjectively i can't as your opinions are objective. btw semantics are subjective and thus not real.
objectively i'd have to agree with you but subjectively i can't as your opinions are objective. btw semantics are subjective and thus not real.
Quoteonce again, give me some empirical evidence rather than these subjective semantic objectives
once again, give me some empirical evidence rather than these subjective semantic objectives
Quoteum don't think so buddy, you are in fact wrong
um don't think so buddy, you are in fact wrong
My sister is an anti-natalist--I just asked her, and she agrees as well.
Quote from: Elink on December 15, 2015, 05:23:30 PMI still cannot comprehend why the fuck Zero Suit Samus wears high-heels.Like, I can understand having a skin-tight layer underneath the regular armour (that doesn't excuse her needlessly curvaceous figure, though), but why the fuck are you wearing those shoes?!her feet are the shape of high heels, they're just normal shoes to her.
I still cannot comprehend why the fuck Zero Suit Samus wears high-heels.Like, I can understand having a skin-tight layer underneath the regular armour (that doesn't excuse her needlessly curvaceous figure, though), but why the fuck are you wearing those shoes?!
Quote from: Batch on December 17, 2015, 04:28:17 PMGod you've come full circle right back to this. You were doing well being....not retarded for most of the year.yeah please ignore the fact that the last two responses were 100% cordial in nature, you fuck
Quote from: Simseoh on December 16, 2015, 07:55:51 AMQuote from: Elink on December 15, 2015, 05:23:30 PMI still cannot comprehend why the fuck Zero Suit Samus wears high-heels.Like, I can understand having a skin-tight layer underneath the regular armour (that doesn't excuse her needlessly curvaceous figure, though), but why the fuck are you wearing those shoes?!her feet are the shape of high heels, they're just normal shoes to her.sign me up