Kelly
Quote from: oss on November 02, 2015, 08:55:33 PMKellyWho is she Chief's fucktoy?
So I was just watching the Reach Legendary Ending. Never played it. But probably will when BC comes out. Don't care how much people say it sucks, I wanna play it. Anyways. Why is that ending in 2589 when even Halo 5 takes places in 2058?
So who wins in the end. Chef or the black guy?
Quote from: Josh55886 on November 02, 2015, 08:53:21 PMSo I was just watching the Reach Legendary Ending. Never played it. But probably will when BC comes out. Don't care how much people say it sucks, I wanna play it. Anyways. Why is that ending in 2589 when even Halo 5 takes places in 2058?Reach doesn't have a legendary ending.Halo 5 takes place in 2558
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 08:58:34 PMQuote from: Josh55886 on November 02, 2015, 08:53:21 PMSo I was just watching the Reach Legendary Ending. Never played it. But probably will when BC comes out. Don't care how much people say it sucks, I wanna play it. Anyways. Why is that ending in 2589 when even Halo 5 takes places in 2058?Reach doesn't have a legendary ending.Halo 5 takes place in 2558Yeah, I meant 2558. Regardless, Legendary or not. The ending narration takes place in 2589.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
Quote from: oss on November 02, 2015, 08:55:33 PMKellywut
Quote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:55:50 PMQuote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:54:03 PM For me I just care about Halo having a great story.You and everyone else, bud. This is the problem, though:Almost everyone, save Roman, would be okay if Master Chief wasn't the main character so long as we got a great story instead. But we didn't. We got a shitty story, AND we only got to play as Chief for 3 missions.Shitty story? That's a debate, for me i thought the story was good. And as for Chief, thinking about it kind of thought that maybe Chief should have like 7 missions ( if we do the math, that would mean that Locke would have 8 missions, 8 + 7 = 15 missions in total, pretty even for everyone) .
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:54:03 PM For me I just care about Halo having a great story.You and everyone else, bud. This is the problem, though:Almost everyone, save Roman, would be okay if Master Chief wasn't the main character so long as we got a great story instead. But we didn't. We got a shitty story, AND we only got to play as Chief for 3 missions.
For me I just care about Halo having a great story.
I want that shotgun certification and railgun and a DMR thats not 8 req
>DMR costs more than a sniper or a tankwat
Quote from: citrus snek on November 02, 2015, 09:55:13 AM"i bought halo 5 to play as green armour dude instead of black armour dude, because it totally makes a difference" - Angry JoeI mean, it kind of does.
"i bought halo 5 to play as green armour dude instead of black armour dude, because it totally makes a difference" - Angry Joe
Quote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 06:05:52 PMQuote from: Préhistorique on November 02, 2015, 05:55:50 PMQuote from: Deathstroke on November 02, 2015, 05:54:03 PM For me I just care about Halo having a great story.You and everyone else, bud. This is the problem, though:Almost everyone, save Roman, would be okay if Master Chief wasn't the main character so long as we got a great story instead. But we didn't. We got a shitty story, AND we only got to play as Chief for 3 missions.Shitty story? That's a debate, for me i thought the story was good. And as for Chief, thinking about it kind of thought that maybe Chief should have like 7 missions ( if we do the math, that would mean that Locke would have 8 missions, 8 + 7 = 15 missions in total, pretty even for everyone) .You must have very low standards for story telling.
Chief is Kelly's fucktoy?
Quote from: True Turquoise on November 03, 2015, 03:59:53 AMI want that shotgun certification and railgun and a DMR thats not 8 req>DMR costs more than a sniper or a tankwat
It's a DMR with a one hit kill bayonet and infinite use.