Spoiler Halo Mega Thread

Why the fuck does it have tit milk modules?

How else are you supposed to carry chocolate milk?

Speakers on its boobs

no

I'm going to wear the fattest armour

I've always wondered how such muscular dudes manage to have a huge thigh gap.

Spartans are lean, not stacked roid monsters

a lot of these are just the recycled, trash helmets from H4.

35 new to halo 5
2 from reach
35 from halo 4

"A lot." You seem like a massive Halo elitist; every time I post a criticism or concern you're the first to try to shoot it down.

because i listed how many were new and how many were old?
i was agreeing with you if anything, you berk.

I'm going to wear the fattest armour

You liked the security shoulders didn't you

moron

I'm going to wear the fattest armour

You liked the security shoulders didn't you

moron

Hell no.

In 3 I wore Mark 5 and CQB

Reach I didn't even buy any armour, because it was crap.

In 5, I'm just going to wear the most ugly armour I can get until I get the one I want

I've always wondered how such muscular dudes manage to have a huge thigh gap.

Spartans are lean, not stacked roid monsters

Even if they're all full otter-mode (which is contradictory to the fact that they literally are roid monsters in power armor), the armor plates wouldn't allow so much room.

Obviously it's an artistic thing and it's not a big deal. I just think it looks funny.

I'm going to wear the fattest armour

You liked the security shoulders didn't you

moron

Hell no.

In 3 I wore Mark 5 and CQB

Reach I didn't even buy any armour, because it was crap.

In 5, I'm just going to wear the most ugly armour I can get until I get the one I want

I am glad that you have an opinion, even if it's wrong.

Even if they're all full otter-mode (which is contradictory to the fact that they literally are roid monsters in power armor)

Spartan-IV =/= Spartan-II. Very different soldiers with Very different augmentation procedures.
They're lean, with defined, denser muscles. They're built like athletes, not body builders.

I'm going to wear the fattest armour

You liked the security shoulders didn't you

moron

Hell no.

In 3 I wore Mark 5 and CQB

Reach I didn't even buy any armour, because it was crap.

In 5, I'm just going to wear the most ugly armour I can get until I get the one I want

I am glad that you have an opinion, even if it's wrong.

lolelites

i think its trying to communicate

What are you trying to prove by posting IIs and IIIs?

They're completely different from IVs.

Plus IIs and IIIs aren't much more stacked than the IVs.

I mean, its just a guess.

But maybe Bungie thought

"Hmmm, maybe we'll make them look a little more buff in this new game, eh?"

No?

oh and "Lets make everything on the female go to her arse"

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids that were kidnapped because they were physically and mentally superior?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

IVs aren't roid filled kids

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

Female Spartans are supposed to be indistinguishable from the males in armor. Everything is artistic license bullshit. Stop trying.

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

IVs aren't roid filled kids

Men checking out a woman.

Okay?

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

Female Spartans are supposed to be indistinguishable from the males in armor. Everything is artistic license bullshit. Stop trying.

Yeah, Reach's female Spartans were pretty ridiculous. Halo 3 had is correct.

However, in Halo 4, they're S-IVs, not S-IIs. They weren't experimented on as kids, and they developed naturally through puberty, unlike S-IIs, therefore they naturally developed, and are therefore more distinguishable.

This isn't hard to understand.

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

Female Spartans are supposed to be indistinguishable from the males in armor. Everything is artistic license bullshit. Stop trying.

Yeah, Reach's female Spartans were pretty ridiculous. Halo 3 had is correct.

However, in Halo 4, they're S-IVs, not S-IIs. They weren't experimented on as kids, and they developed naturally through puberty, unlike S-IIs, therefore they naturally developed, and are therefore more distinguishable.

This isn't hard to understand.

But aren't the Spartans in Reach's multiplayer supposed to be IIIs? IIIs weren't totally similar to IIs since they were older when they were conscripted by the UNSC than IIs.

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

Female Spartans are supposed to be indistinguishable from the males in armor. Everything is artistic license bullshit. Stop trying.

Yeah, Reach's female Spartans were pretty ridiculous. Halo 3 had is correct.

However, in Halo 4, they're S-IVs, not S-IIs. They weren't experimented on as kids, and they developed naturally through puberty, unlike S-IIs, therefore they naturally developed, and are therefore more distinguishable.

This isn't hard to understand.

It had to do with the armor, numbnuts.

They're completely different from IVs.

Except they aren't

You mean besides the very different and more advanced augmentation procedures, and that IVs aren't roid filled kids?

But yeah, besides that they're exactly the same.

Female Spartans are supposed to be indistinguishable from the males in armor. Everything is artistic license bullshit. Stop trying.

Yeah, Reach's female Spartans were pretty ridiculous. Halo 3 had is correct.

However, in Halo 4, they're S-IVs, not S-IIs. They weren't experimented on as kids, and they developed naturally through puberty, unlike S-IIs, therefore they naturally developed, and are therefore more distinguishable.

This isn't hard to understand.

But aren't the Spartans in Reach's multiplayer supposed to be IIIs? IIIs weren't totally similar to IIs since they were older when they were conscripted by the UNSC than IIs.

IIIs were orphaned kids. They were typically up to 6 years old, Carter being one of the exceptions, as he was 11 (biologically, at least. He may have spent a considerable amount time in cryo, thus being physically younger).

The IIIs are closer to the IIs than the IVs are to the IIs.

The IIIs augmentation procedure was almost entirely chemical based too, unlike the IIs which was mainly through surgical means, hence why they're so scarred, but both yielded very similar results.

I mean, its just a guess.

But maybe Bungie thought

"Hmmm, maybe we'll make them look a little more buff in this new game, eh?"

No?

oh and "Lets make everything on the female go to her arse"

Butts are nice

I mean, its just a guess.

But maybe Bungie thought

"Hmmm, maybe we'll make them look a little more buff in this new game, eh?"

No?

oh and "Lets make everything on the female go to her arse"

Butts are nice

thighs

I mean, its just a guess.

But maybe Bungie thought

"Hmmm, maybe we'll make them look a little more buff in this new game, eh?"

No?

oh and "Lets make everything on the female go to her arse"

Butts are nice

thighs

YouTube