Dark Souls is easily one of the best games of all time.

 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
"why do I have to fight this boss? I don't consent to this enemy being here"

"oh I can skip the boss at the cost of having to traverse a dangerous area? Wtf I don't want to mitigate my experience"
LMAO

I knew someone was going to make this SHIT comparison.

Bosses aren't people, genius. Therefore, consent isn't an issue.

Continue being a blind fanboy.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
It is consensual. Don't want people to invade? Go hollow or don't play the game.
You don't get to play co-op if you play hollow, and you're forced to play as an ugly... thing.

Bad game design.

Your guy is usually covered head to toe in armour anyway so you don't have to see that dried out bacon strip. The character is titled "the chosen undead", though, so if you don't like playing as a zombie this game really isn't for you.

An easy workaround to this is to play hollow and when you think you need help go human and summon someone (it's what I do when I don't want to fight people).


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
"why do I have to fight this boss? I don't consent to this enemy being here"

"oh I can skip the boss at the cost of having to traverse a dangerous area? Wtf I don't want to mitigate my experience"
LMAO

I knew someone was going to make this SHIT comparison.

Bosses aren't people, genius. Therefore, consent isn't an issue.

Continue being a blind fanboy.
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
Invasions are lore-driven
i really could not conceivably give less of a fuck--sorry
Quote
and only occur in a couple specific, high-level areas to purposefully add a challenge. Yes, they can be very frustrating, but ultimately you can stop them from happening by killing a specific NPC in the level, or just quitting and coming back. Invasions are kind of fun because you can set traps for them too; they don't occur in arena, they occur anywhere in a level, so you can prepare yourself (or just hide and let them leave).
I was told you could do that in Bloodborne, but not Dark Souls.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
Why should we have to have trade-offs and make hard decisions that can greatly alter how we play wtf I want my choices to all result the same way wtf guys
Thank you for misrepresenting my argument again.

You enjoy getting raped--I get it. Not everyone is as crazy as you are.
"Good things coming with sacrifices are bad"
Bad things come with sacrifices as well. Unnecessarily bad things.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.
And breach of consent. Which is a pretty big fucking sin when it comes to playing a game that is meant to be entertaining to play.


Septy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: DarkestSeptagon
PSN: Fallfav
Steam:
ID: Septy
IP: Logged

12,027 posts
See you Cowgirl,
Someday, somewhere
This poor thread


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.
And breach of consent. Which is a pretty big fucking sin when it comes to playing a game that is meant to be entertaining to play.
Discern between an invasion and NPC aggro range.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.
And breach of consent. Which is a pretty big fucking sin when it comes to playing a game that is meant to be entertaining to play.
Discern between an invasion and NPC aggro range.
I don't know what you mean.


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.
And breach of consent. Which is a pretty big fucking sin when it comes to playing a game that is meant to be entertaining to play.
Discern between an invasion and NPC aggro range.
I don't know what you mean.
You walk within an NPCs aggro range and you made a choice that comes with the consequence of a fight. You leave the bonfire as a human and linger too long, someone is going to hunt you for humanity.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
You walk within an NPCs aggro range and you made a choice that comes with the consequence of a fight. You leave the bonfire as a human and linger too long, someone is going to hunt you for humanity.
NPCs aren't sentient and just do what they're programmed to do.

Human beings are sentient, and actively make the choice to fuck you over without asking.

NPCs don't have to ask--the "consent" is that you're playing a video game where you are expected to kill some NPCs.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
The only legitimate complaints that can be had about PvP that doesnt apply to NPCs are shit netcode, exploits, and balance problems.
And breach of consent. Which is a pretty big fucking sin when it comes to playing a game that is meant to be entertaining to play.

You consent to playing a game where people attack you without consent. So, it's not really an issue of consent here, it's an issue of you not giving the game a chance and just blindly hating on it.



 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
You consent to playing a game where people attack you without consent. So, it's not really an issue of consent here, it's an issue of you not giving the game a chance and just blindly hating on it.
No, you don't. There is no contract or disclaimer at the beginning of the game that says, "People in this game behave like cunts. Brace yourself."

Only then would you have a point.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
Invasions are lore-driven
i really could not conceivably give less of a fuck--sorry
Quote
and only occur in a couple specific, high-level areas to purposefully add a challenge. Yes, they can be very frustrating, but ultimately you can stop them from happening by killing a specific NPC in the level, or just quitting and coming back. Invasions are kind of fun because you can set traps for them too; they don't occur in arena, they occur anywhere in a level, so you can prepare yourself (or just hide and let them leave).
I was told you could do that in Bloodborne, but not Dark Souls.

You can quit out of invasions in any Souls game, and like I said, it occurs in specific areas, not just anywhere. A fun feature is that you can 'indict' invaders by speaking to an NPC who adds their name to a list of people to be invaded more often. And like others have said, just staying hollow stops it all, and since you only summon players and NPCs for bosses, you'll only be human for a couple minutes.

Sounds like you're going to give the series another try, so I don't need to convince you. I just hope this puts you a little more at ease about something I think you believed was very disruptive. You could easily play through the whole game as human without getting invaded once.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
You consent to playing a game where people attack you without consent. So, it's not really an issue of consent here, it's an issue of you not giving the game a chance and just blindly hating on it.
No, you don't. There is no contract or disclaimer at the beginning of the game that says, "People in this game behave like cunts. Brace yourself."

Only then would you have a point.

That's not the games problem. That's a problem with people.


aREALgod | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: aTALLmidget
IP: Logged

5,169 posts
 
A lot of what verb says is just blatantly wrong because he hasn't even played the game past the tutorial.
There is no way, no how to justify non-consensual invasions. I don't care how they work.
good thing their aren't any non-consensual invasions then huh
"Rape is consensual."

ok solonoid

You really have gone full retard. You've been absolutely proven wrong on multiple times on this and you STILL insist on "LOL NO THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS I DON'T CONSENT LOL"

You have no ability to even argue on the mechanics here, considering you left the tutorial incomplete like a little bitch. The game kicked your ass before you even had a chance to experience the possibility of other players and you're clearly asshurt about it. That, or you insist on repeating the same broken argument over so much you'd make an autistic child's redundant habits look completely normal by comparison. Your tactic here is literally bring every down to your level and "beat" them by persistent stupidity.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
Also, it's kind of hard to argue that the Souls community is fun, polite, and follows PVP etiquette while Souls fans shit all over a new player expressing legitimate concerns about a unique feature of the game he's probably never seen before.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
That's not the games problem. That's a problem with people.
Sure. But the game itself does fuck all about it, beyond the whole hollow thing. It enables players to act like shitheads, and that's what I hate.


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
You walk within an NPCs aggro range and you made a choice that comes with the consequence of a fight. You leave the bonfire as a human and linger too long, someone is going to hunt you for humanity.
NPCs aren't sentient and just do what they're programmed to do.

Human beings are sentient, and actively make the choice to fuck you over without asking.

NPCs don't have to ask--the "consent" is that you're playing a video game where you are expected to kill some NPCs.
In this game you consent to invasions by playing as a human.

You're expected to do these things.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
Also, it's kind of hard to argue that the Souls community is fun, polite, and follows PVP etiquette while Souls fans shit all over a new player expressing legitimate concerns about a unique feature of the game he's probably never seen before.
I appreciate your reasonableness.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
In this game you consent to invasions by playing as a human.

You're expected to do these things.
I don't think I signed that contract. I didn't see that disclaimer.
That's because there isn't one, as far as I know.

Would you concede that there should be?


Deleted | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: ChaosMetalDragon
IP: Logged

10,766 posts
 
ITT:

Verb: I do not like this mechanic and so it's a bad game and my personal opinion is now fact.
Everyone else: No you're not allowed to dislike this cause muh Dark Souls superiority complex.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
That's not the games problem. That's a problem with people.
Sure. But the game itself does fuck all about it, beyond the whole hollow thing. It enables players to act like shitheads, and that's what I hate.

As turkey said, you can punish people for acting like a shithead. Though, tbh, indictments have kinda been reduced to a message basically saying "this guy is super mad that you killed him".


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
In this game you consent to invasions by playing as a human.

You're expected to do these things.
I don't think I signed that contract. I didn't see that disclaimer.
That's because there isn't one, as far as I know.

Would you concede that there should be?
Is there a disclaimer that you'll have to fight NPCs? Why does there have to be one? Do you cry over the NPC invasions too?  The back of the box says there's online multiplayer.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
ITT:

Verb: I do not like this mechanic and so it's a bad game and my personal opinion is now fact.
Everyone else: No you're not allowed to dislike this cause muh Dark Souls superiority complex.

You're wrong. I'm simply trying to explain that the mechanic isn't really that bad and that there are ways around it.
Last Edit: December 07, 2015, 11:11:37 AM by KinderEssen


eggsalad | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: eggsalad
ID: eggsalad
IP: Logged

2,495 posts
 
There's legit reasons to dislike the game.

Consent clauses aren't one of them.


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
Is there a disclaimer that you'll have to fight NPCs?
No. Stop comparing NPCs to humans. They're two fundamentally different things.
Quote
Why does there have to be one?
Because it's a form of consent. Without it, the player cannot be blamed for getting invaded, because he had no way of knowing you could get invaded in this game until it happened.
Quote
Do you cry over the NPC invasions too?
No, because, again, NPCs are not people.

If it happens at complete random, then yeah, that might be cause for complaint.
RNG always has been stupid, in any game.
Quote
The back of the box says there's online multiplayer.
But not invasions.


Tyger | Elite Four Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: TP_OneThree
PSN: Tyger_Power
Steam:
ID: Tyger
IP: Logged

10,584 posts
 
ITT:

Verb: I do not like this mechanic and so it's a bad game and my personal opinion is now fact.
Everyone else: No you're not allowed to dislike this cause muh Dark Souls superiority complex.
I can think of a dozen reasons to dislike dark souls but comparing it to rape isn't one of them


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
Oh, don't worry--I'll find some more reasons to dislike Dark Souls. If that's what you want me to do, I'll do it.