Dark Souls is bad.

i mean, i have a metric fuckton of others, but that's probably the most controversial one

along with, "it's possible to dislike Dark Souls for reasons unrelated to its difficulty"

Halo 4 was better than Reach.

343i is doing a good job with Halo.

Bethesda creates lackluster games.

Just off the top of my head.

Bethesda creates lackluster games.

That's not an opinion.

Minato is the most powerful Persona protag.
CoD is at worst a mediocre game, and despite it's hate mob, is a necessity in the gaming market.
Destiny wasn't that bad of a game.

Halo is garbage.

Outside sep7/other communities spawned around Bungie, it's probably not that controversial an opinion.

Mods shouldn't be an excuse for a dev releasing a bad game.
It's pathetic to release a game and have the community fix all of your fuckups.

it's the same experience as watching them on YouTube.

Somehow I doubt you've even played a Telltale game properly.

OT:
The only bad CoDs are MW3 and Ghosts.
David Cage is an awful writer.
Half Life 2 is mediocre at best.
AC4 is the best in the series.
KOTOR 2 is far better than 1.
ME2 is the best in the series.
I rarely mod my games.
Destiny is a great game.
Tales from the Borderlands is better than the actual Borderlands games.
GTA V is one of the best games of the previous generation.

David Cage is an awful writer.

This is controversial?

Halo CE is one of the worst Halo games in terms of multiplayer.

ShivSimulator2014 had an okay story.
Arkham Origins wasn't that bad.
Pokemon is trash.
99% of Modern Nintendo is garbage.
PC is indeed the better platform.
PC Elitists need to go and stay go.
Console Elitists need to go and stay go.
87% of FPSs are forgettable.
Most modern games are shit.
Skyrim is an okay game. Nothing that sets it a part of the other Elder Scrolls except for the Radiant System and Serana's advanced AI.
ACIV was the pinnacle of the franchise.
Wolfenstein: The New Order is possibly the best thing you gonna get out of the shooter genre.

Metaphysically speaking, there is no such thing as "bad voice acting", or "bad acting" in general.
As such, complaints about a game's voice acting are always moot. Find better things to complain about.

The most vital aspects of a game are as follows:
Gameplay > Story > Lasting appeal > Music >>>>> Graphics > Everything else

Lemon proved my earlier point.

~~~

PC gaming is garbage.
Console elitism is justified.

Games should always be played with the default settings on your first playthrough.
If the default settings suck, this harms the game.

A bad game doesn't automatically become good just because you have the option to block/remove the bad parts.
(Maybe not controversial, but when people tell me to just "shut the feature off" if I don't like it, that's not a real solution)
(If a feature is bad, it shouldn't be in the game, period)

All games are interactive movies.

Are you talking no modding or you can't change your control scheme? If it's the latter, then fuck right off.

Quote

30 frames would be objectively better in that context.

No it wouldn't.

If you wanted to create an authentic '70s feel?

Yes, it would.

Double the frames per second results in a smother, better flowing picture, so yeah it's better.

What if you don't like smooth? What if smooth isn't the effect you're trying to go for?

You're just using adjectives that don't intrinsically prove anything.

Under your logic, people who are 300 pounds obese are better than people who are 200 pounds of muscle.
Because obese people have "smoother" skin. And "smooth" is apparently intrinsically good.