No wonder Jason Jones left.
Quote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:07:06 PMNo wonder Jason Jones left.Jason Jones is still at Bungie
Quote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:08:37 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:07:06 PMNo wonder Jason Jones left.Jason Jones is still at BungieI thought he quit?
Quote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:11:02 PMQuote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:08:37 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:07:06 PMNo wonder Jason Jones left.Jason Jones is still at BungieI thought he quit?Joe Staten quit.
Quote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:12:24 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:11:02 PMQuote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:08:37 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:07:06 PMNo wonder Jason Jones left.Jason Jones is still at BungieI thought he quit?Joe Staten quit.I thought Jason Jones did too.
Quote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:13:29 PMQuote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:12:24 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:11:02 PMQuote from: Septy on October 31, 2014, 04:08:37 PMQuote from: MattyFez on October 31, 2014, 04:07:06 PMNo wonder Jason Jones left.Jason Jones is still at BungieI thought he quit?Joe Staten quit.I thought Jason Jones did too.Nope
Quote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?That agrees with what I said. With destiny they didn't want to be ambitious with a fantasy game so they played it safe with a sci-fi shooter. They cut content then sold it after release for $35. With Halo 2 they were trying to put in so much they ran out of time. Destiny doesn't even have a plot.
Quote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?
Quote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.
Quote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the game
Quote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut content
It's $35 for BOTH expansions
Quote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?Halo 2 was literally scrapped and started again, Destiny wasn't.
Quote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 05:25:17 PMQuote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?Halo 2 was literally scrapped and started again, Destiny wasn't.Destiny's story literally was.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on October 31, 2014, 05:31:50 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 05:25:17 PMQuote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?Halo 2 was literally scrapped and started again, Destiny wasn't.Destiny's story literally was.Story =/= entire game
Quote from: Sly Instinct on October 31, 2014, 03:57:40 PMQuote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?That agrees with what I said. With destiny they didn't want to be ambitious with a fantasy game so they played it safe with a sci-fi shooter. They cut content then sold it after release for $35. With Halo 2 they were trying to put in so much they ran out of time. Destiny doesn't even have a plot.Well at first bungie wasn't sure. Joe Staten wanted the ambitious fantasy game, but the Bungie higher ups wanted to play the safe route. After Joe Staten left they went the safe route. iirc the cut content was cut because they're direction of the game by then was all over the place, and some things didn't make sense anymore after all the changes. Basically the needed more time to redo a bunch of more shit and didn't have enough time to fix everything, so they started cutting things.
Quote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 04:44:15 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on October 31, 2014, 03:57:40 PMQuote from: Hawk on October 31, 2014, 03:41:37 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 02:20:32 PMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 08:54:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on October 31, 2014, 07:11:30 AMQuote from: Kinder on October 31, 2014, 03:06:15 AMIt's $35 for BOTH expansionsStill a fucking ripoff.$60 for less than half of a game + $35 for cut contentSo was H2 a rip-off? I mean, this is the same situationBoth are unfinished gamesH3 was $60 and was the cut part of H2; 4 Destiny DLCs are $60 and the cut content of the gameThe difference is that this was cut intentionally and not the same situation at all.Halo 2 was unfinished, ended on a cliffhanger and had broken MP because Halo 2 was in development hell. They ran out of time, thus Halo 3 finished it (although rather poorly).Destiny has been in development since before Reach, so they had plenty of time.Destiny is shit, and what Bungie are doing is shit.This is something EA would do.Destiny was in development hell to ya know. Remember that bungie employee who posted what had happened to destiny on reddit?That agrees with what I said. With destiny they didn't want to be ambitious with a fantasy game so they played it safe with a sci-fi shooter. They cut content then sold it after release for $35. With Halo 2 they were trying to put in so much they ran out of time. Destiny doesn't even have a plot.Well at first bungie wasn't sure. Joe Staten wanted the ambitious fantasy game, but the Bungie higher ups wanted to play the safe route. After Joe Staten left they went the safe route. iirc the cut content was cut because they're direction of the game by then was all over the place, and some things didn't make sense anymore after all the changes. Basically the needed more time to redo a bunch of more shit and didn't have enough time to fix everything, so they started cutting things.Essentially another Halo 2 rush incident.. yet despite Halo's issues, was a big hit.
Well Bungie wants us to savor the sandwich so they put shards of glass in it so we have to take more time.
I could tell you how the sandwich was separated. I could tell you about the great flavor of it. But the children are already frightened.
It took me three hours on venus looking through caves to find enough cucumbers to half way fill it.
There's more story on the ingredient section.
You're obviously not eating it the way the chef intended you to.
Bungie is commiting suicide
