I don't understand the "inverse difficulty" argument against the game (starts off hard and gets easier). Hasn't Legend of Zelda always been this way? The collection of hearts makes the combat far easier as time goes on in Ocarina of Time, and considering enemies both a) scale with you in this game, and b) can take off multiple hearts with a single swing (thus making heart collection less critical), I would say BoTW does it better than that game at the very least. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms of the game, I just don't really subscribe to this one.
Re: musicI also dig the atmospheric stuff, but so much of the music is understated in the game. There's no soaring pieces except in the intro and the final boss fight and the castle. I started replaying TPP and there's just nothing that even comes close to stuff like this:YouTube
The horse-riding theme is pretty fucking GOAT imo.
Really? I find it kind of repititive and short.Maybe it's because I spend too much time on horseback, as I don't use the fast travel mechanic.
I still think the Labyrinth themes are the best in the game, though.
Quote from: prehistoric on March 23, 2017, 04:50:07 PMI still think the Labyrinth themes are the best in the game, though.Oh yeah, that's a great one too. Only been to one labyrinth so far, though.
I wonder how good the next Zelda will be. Can't wait.
Yeah I enjoyed BOTW but I wouldn't consider it the be all end all of videogame entertainment or anything. I'd still rather play Wind Waker. I found the breakable weapons to be an annoyance (I know it's there for a reason but it doesn't mean I have to like it) and the game had weak villains. I'd probably give it an 8/10 to be honest.
I don't understand the "inverse difficulty" argument against the game (starts off hard and gets easier). Hasn't Legend of Zelda always been this way? The collection of hearts makes the combat far easier as time goes on in Ocarina of Time, and considering enemies both a) scale with you in this game, and b) can take off multiple hearts with a single swing (thus making heart collection less critical), I would say BoTW does it better than that game at the very least. There are plenty of legitimate criticisms of the game, I just don't really subscribe to this one.Also, if someone would like to post something in response so I don't feel like I'm talking to myself sans TBlock's likes, that'd be stellar.
On an honest scale of one to ten with Skyrim being the one and Witcher 3 being the 10, what number would this came fall on when it comes to depth? Also is the game's world entertaining enough where you can play for hours without resorting to quests for entertainment? For the Witcher 3 despite the depth to the game, I found the game's world to be very boring after 40 hours of riding around and killing shit. I have thoughts of getting the Switch mainly for this game so I want to make sure I'm not going to stop playing once I complete the main quests. When it comes to open world games I spend the majority of my time running around it, rather than replaying the quests.
Quote from: Ser(cation needed) Duncan on March 24, 2017, 07:26:09 PMOn an honest scale of one to ten with Skyrim being the one and Witcher 3 being the 10, what number would this came fall on when it comes to depth? Also is the game's world entertaining enough where you can play for hours without resorting to quests for entertainment? For the Witcher 3 despite the depth to the game, I found the game's world to be very boring after 40 hours of riding around and killing shit. I have thoughts of getting the Switch mainly for this game so I want to make sure I'm not going to stop playing once I complete the main quests. When it comes to open world games I spend the majority of my time running around it, rather than replaying the quests.I would never recommend buying a console for one game
Anyone else complete the Lover's Pond sidequest?
the Wii-U is obsolete, go with the Switch.