Quote from: Verbatim on July 27, 2016, 01:02:52 PMQuote from: Jono on July 27, 2016, 01:02:07 PMQuote from: Vien on July 27, 2016, 12:57:52 PMLet's bitch about Gears of War for making everyone beefy.And handsome afI don't see handsome there.opinion
Quote from: Jono on July 27, 2016, 01:02:07 PMQuote from: Vien on July 27, 2016, 12:57:52 PMLet's bitch about Gears of War for making everyone beefy.And handsome afI don't see handsome there.
Quote from: Vien on July 27, 2016, 12:57:52 PMLet's bitch about Gears of War for making everyone beefy.And handsome af
Let's bitch about Gears of War for making everyone beefy.
Given that Unity was apparently a completely rushed mess, it seems like a perfectly valid excuse.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on July 28, 2016, 07:42:53 AMGiven that Unity was apparently a completely rushed mess, it seems like a perfectly valid excuse.Them being lazy developers isn't an excuse.
Quote from: Pippen on July 28, 2016, 09:05:49 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on July 28, 2016, 07:42:53 AMGiven that Unity was apparently a completely rushed mess, it seems like a perfectly valid excuse.Them being lazy developers isn't an excuse.I dunno, man. Something like "We have a ridiculous timeframe and cant even do things that matter like bug testing and optimization" seems like a good response to "why no chick character yo?"
Isn't Ubisoft like staffed by way more female employees than it was say six years ago? I'm sure they must have said something.
Ubisoft is pretty awful and lazy, but complaining about the "lack of women in games" is stupid in itself.
How?
And for every female character that is poorly represented in their game, take that as a -1.
being able to play as a female character is nice for people that want it
How so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it?
Quote from: 70damoN on July 28, 2016, 12:10:46 PMHow so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it? Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.
Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.
Quote from: Verbatim on July 28, 2016, 12:15:50 PMBecause it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.
Quote from: Verbatim on July 28, 2016, 12:15:50 PMQuote from: 70damoN on July 28, 2016, 12:10:46 PMHow so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it? Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.No no no, that's a privileged and not a right in video games, developers shouldn't be forced to add things they don't want because 'it's the right thing to do'You're basically putting a mandatory standard on art.
Quote from: Batch on July 29, 2016, 11:09:40 AMQuote from: Verbatim on July 28, 2016, 12:15:50 PMQuote from: 70damoN on July 28, 2016, 12:10:46 PMHow so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it? Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.No no no, that's a privileged and not a right in video games, developers shouldn't be forced to add things they don't want because 'it's the right thing to do'You're basically putting a mandatory standard on art.Except nobody's doing that. Way to draw unnecessary conclusions like the typical reactionary moron.
Quote from: Verbatim on July 29, 2016, 11:11:01 AMQuote from: Batch on July 29, 2016, 11:09:40 AMQuote from: Verbatim on July 28, 2016, 12:15:50 PMQuote from: 70damoN on July 28, 2016, 12:10:46 PMHow so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it? Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.No no no, that's a privileged and not a right in video games, developers shouldn't be forced to add things they don't want because 'it's the right thing to do'You're basically putting a mandatory standard on art.Except nobody's doing that. Way to draw unnecessary conclusions like the typical reactionary moron.Right, no ones forcing them except every other 3rd wave feminist strapped to Anitas back.
Quote from: Batch on July 29, 2016, 11:38:57 AMQuote from: Verbatim on July 29, 2016, 11:11:01 AMQuote from: Batch on July 29, 2016, 11:09:40 AMQuote from: Verbatim on July 28, 2016, 12:15:50 PMQuote from: 70damoN on July 28, 2016, 12:10:46 PMHow so? It's nice, but if no one cares except for losers like Anita, then why should game companies do it? Because it's about equality. It doesn't matter who wants it. It's the right thing to do.No no no, that's a privileged and not a right in video games, developers shouldn't be forced to add things they don't want because 'it's the right thing to do'You're basically putting a mandatory standard on art.Except nobody's doing that. Way to draw unnecessary conclusions like the typical reactionary moron.Right, no ones forcing them except every other 3rd wave feminist strapped to Anitas back.Nope, they're not doing it either.
Spoiler
Quote from: KING IN DA NORTH! on July 30, 2016, 05:48:57 AMSpoilerhttps://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/155/Relative-Privation
Quote from: Verbatim on July 30, 2016, 09:20:05 AMQuote from: KING IN DA NORTH! on July 30, 2016, 05:48:57 AMSpoilerhttps://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/155/Relative-Privationhttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy
Quote from: Tyger on July 30, 2016, 10:02:04 AMQuote from: Verbatim on July 30, 2016, 09:20:05 AMQuote from: KING IN DA NORTH! on July 30, 2016, 05:48:57 AMSpoilerhttps://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/155/Relative-Privationhttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacyI never argued that he was wrong based solely on the fact that he made a fallacious argument.Which means you made a fallacy fallacy fallacy.
Anita Sarkeesian - Are Women Too Hard To Animate?
