Why haven't we made submarine aircraft carriers yet?

Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
Why? We've already mastered the ways of the aircraft carrier and with our ridiculous military budget, it shouldn't be a problem to build. So why hasn't the Pentagon taken the idea seriously? Modern carriers are extremely vulnerable to enemy attack subs, but a submarine aircraft carrier could stealthily pass enemy defenses and make it's way to the enemies' shores and quickly launch aircraft in a surprise attack. So why do we prefer surface carriers over submersible ones?


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✡ 🔥🔥🔥 🌈ðŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,062 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
Could you even have a submarine that big?


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
Could you even have a submarine that big?
Sure. Just look at the Russian Typhoon.


nͫiͤcͫeͤ | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: my Xbox broke
PSN: PM for Request
Steam: very hot water vapor
ID: Ryle
IP: Logged

15,087 posts
the dj spins and cuts me
           hardcore will never die
: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ )               https://youtu.be/uDF4cwAghAc
: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ )
: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ )
) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ )
: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ )
: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็ ) : ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
I think the Petagon is working on a death ray that will be put on the moon.


 
cxfhvxgkcf-56:7
| Marty Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: SoporificSlash
IP: Logged

15,656 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,622 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
It's not a very practical thing. It would have to carry less than our current carriers, cost a ridiculous amount more per unit, and require absurd amounts of pmcs and upkeep.

Besides, it's not like our carriers operate alone without anti-sub support or even on the edge of a naval group. Those things stay pretty central, so you've got a lot of ships and countermeasures to get through to hit one.


V | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Vien Quitonm
PSN:
Steam: Vien 'Quitonm
ID: Vien
IP: Logged

13,105 posts
Just message me.
Vien 'Quitonm#1598 is my discord
Wouldn't it have to turn into a surface carrier to allow aircraft to launch?
That seems like it could potentially be problematic, unless you expect aircraft to suddenly know how to swim.
They already made jets that can take off across the water.


Unconventional and a waste.


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
Wouldn't it have to turn into a surface carrier to allow aircraft to launch?
That seems like it could potentially be problematic, unless you expect aircraft to suddenly know how to swim.
Not at all. It could be exactly like a ballistic missile submarine where the missiles can fire even when the sub is still submerged. With an aircraft carrier I guess they could put the aircraft in special pods to fire them through the water or something.


Yu | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Yutaka
IP: Logged

12,707 posts
Almost always, with moderation
It probably has to do with the process of changing from water to air mode. With the money that would go into it, other people would see that it could better be spent else where than on something that might not even work so well.


Dustin | Heroic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Greedy Jew
PSN: Jews Did 911
Steam: Chimpout 2014
ID: Le Dustin
IP: Logged

5,814 posts
This is pathetic, Cheat
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
That would require some insane engineering to be able to submerse a vehicle of that size. The elevators to bring the craft to the flight deck would also need to be sealed better than they probably can be. I doubt it would be able to dive very far, since the water pressure might be too much for the elevators to handle. I guess there could be retractable doors that go over the elevator to seal it. It is an interesting idea, but it would quite an engineering feat.
It wouldn't need elevators. They could launch the aircraft exactly the same way ballistic missile submarines fir their payloads. Would just need some special pods to protect the aircraft from the water.


Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
That seems excessive.
Well Noel already explained the difficulties with elevators on a submarine and it's a much better alternative from my point of view.


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Auspicious Rose | Respected Posting Rampage
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sentra
IP: Logged

1,236 posts
 
It's not a very practical thing. It would have to carry less than our current carriers, cost a ridiculous amount more per unit, and require absurd amounts of pmcs and upkeep.

Besides, it's not like our carriers operate alone without anti-sub support or even on the edge of a naval group. Those things stay pretty central, so you've got a lot of ships and countermeasures to get through to hit one.
True, but a submersible carrier wouldn't need a whole carrier group escorting it since it could stealthily navigate through the waters by itself.


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Septy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: DarkestSeptagon
PSN: Fallfav
Steam:
ID: Septy
IP: Logged

12,028 posts
See you Cowgirl,
Someday, somewhere
Aircraft carriers have large indoor hangars beneath the flight deck where craft are stored, and then taken to the deck with large elevators. That is how a vehicle like this would function. They would obviously not leave any aircraft on the flight deck when submerging. They would need retractable doors to seal the elevators, but would not need to cover the entire flight deck.
What he's saying is you still need a flight deck, the purpose of a submarine is complete stealth but something like a flight deck completely destroys that.


Dustin | Heroic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Greedy Jew
PSN: Jews Did 911
Steam: Chimpout 2014
ID: Le Dustin
IP: Logged

5,814 posts
This is pathetic, Cheat
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Kinder Graham | Respected Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: TFL Blazing
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IchEsseKinder
IP: Logged

7,293 posts
TUNNEL SNAKES RULE
(ง ͡͡ ° ͜ ʖ ͡ °)ง
Not many people are stupid enough to attack an American aircraft carrier either.
Except the Japanese >.>

damn ballsy mofos


Super Irish | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Superirish19
PSN: Superirish19
Steam: Superirish19
ID: Super Irish
IP: Logged

6,000 posts
If I'm not here, I'm doing photography. Or I'm asleep. Or in lockdown. One of those three, anyway.

The current titlebar/avatar setup is just normal.
Japan did this in WWII: (and I believe Britain had a similar design to protect merchant vessels from German subs, though they ditched the plane after)


http://www.historynet.com/japanese-bomb-the-continental-u-s-west-coast.htm


Granted, it was quite rudimentary, but think of the potential today what with the technological advances since. Unfortunately it's a pipe dream as why launch planes from carriers to recon and bomb things when you have drones and ICBM's to do it for you?


Septy | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: DarkestSeptagon
PSN: Fallfav
Steam:
ID: Septy
IP: Logged

12,028 posts
See you Cowgirl,
Someday, somewhere


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,622 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
True, but a submersible carrier wouldn't need a whole carrier group escorting it since it could stealthily navigate through the waters by itself.
That's a very big target though to send out on it's own. Far too risky.


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Super Irish | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Superirish19
PSN: Superirish19
Steam: Superirish19
ID: Super Irish
IP: Logged

6,000 posts
If I'm not here, I'm doing photography. Or I'm asleep. Or in lockdown. One of those three, anyway.

The current titlebar/avatar setup is just normal.
They are a completely unrealistic idea, just like the flying one in The Avengers. I am simply discussing how one would function as both a submarine and an aircraft carrier. It is basically impossible, just fun to discuss.


But it is possible. Not entirely effective (and not in the same way Sentra has described), but it's already been done.


crumpster212 | Newbie
 
more |
XBL: crumpster212
PSN:
Steam:
ID: crumpster212
IP: Logged

12 posts
The Dragon with the axe goes chop, chop, chop.


Sprungli | Heroic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: RadialRacer
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sprungli
IP: Logged

3,875 posts
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
It's unneeded, warfare is fought in code and at a nano scale, the days of large tanks and ships are well behind us


Sprungli | Heroic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: RadialRacer
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sprungli
IP: Logged

3,875 posts
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
And they were used extensively in the pacific during WW2, technically

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_aircraft_carrier


Juuzou | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lady Noelle
IP: Logged

10,912 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Sprungli | Heroic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: RadialRacer
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Sprungli
IP: Logged

3,875 posts
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

This is a discussion about merging a modern submarine and modern aircraft carrier though.

True, but we just don't need them, the reason I cited WW2 was to show they DID have a use, but tech has moved on