Quote from: SecondClass on June 02, 2015, 10:56:21 PMIt's hardly the most important issue out there.Neither is drug laws but you seem pretty adamant about speaking about that.
It's hardly the most important issue out there.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on June 02, 2015, 10:52:08 PMTits are sexual. Men like tits. Get over it.Wrong. Men don't like titsEVERYONE, even gay people love tits
Tits are sexual. Men like tits. Get over it.
Quote from: Luciana on June 02, 2015, 11:24:37 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on June 02, 2015, 10:52:08 PMTits are sexual. Men like tits. Get over it.Wrong. Men don't like titsEVERYONE, even gay people love titsThat also means that technically every woman is slightly lesbian. To a shade.
Quote from: Sandtrap on June 02, 2015, 11:26:14 PMQuote from: Luciana on June 02, 2015, 11:24:37 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on June 02, 2015, 10:52:08 PMTits are sexual. Men like tits. Get over it.Wrong. Men don't like titsEVERYONE, even gay people love titsThat also means that technically every woman is slightly lesbian. To a shade.Not really. Humans just love them because it's hotwired in our brains for many reasons, men and women.
2. Graphic Content (Strict Moderation) Sexual/Shock/Gore images and videos must remain in Anarchy only. NSFW responses in safe-for-work (SFW) threads are not allowed, due to spoiler problems on Taptatalk NSFW threads (including sex role-plays, sex stories, Cheerio threads, etc.) that do not include photos or videos are allowed in The Flood, so long as the thread is distinguished as being NSFW. Responses in these threads do not need to be in spoiler tags.
Boobs are inheritently sexual and private, that's why. We are and have always been a SFW site, meaning that we won't simply allow things that would get people in trouble for viewing them in public or at work. And it just so happens to be that boobs are considered NSFW and not something that society deems acceptable to view in public because of their sexual tone. We don't make these standards. We just enforce them on our site to keep things SFW. It's not as if we, the mods of sep7agon.net, deliberately made the choice to have society view boobs as NSFW.
I'll do the policy bit firsthand <.<Quote2. Graphic Content (Strict Moderation) Sexual/Shock/Gore images and videos must remain in Anarchy only. NSFW responses in safe-for-work (SFW) threads are not allowed, due to spoiler problems on Taptatalk NSFW threads (including sex role-plays, sex stories, Cheerio threads, etc.) that do not include photos or videos are allowed in The Flood, so long as the thread is distinguished as being NSFW. Responses in these threads do not need to be in spoiler tags.So loosely put, a picture of bewbs isn't allowed because it's not safe for work. I think there is a caveat we've been operating with where you can link to it in a marked spoiler thus circumventing the NSFW issue and being able to make your point that way >.>For the wider issue, I'm afraid the inclinations of meatbags over what is sexualised and why is kind of a blank spot for me. My best guess would be to call upon an old deceased foe for an explanation but really I can't say why.I find all lewd things distasteful but that's because I'm a nutcase, but to hide behind the badge I just do the cleaning up >.>
It is unfair. Breasts aren't sexual organs, but for some reason they have to be hidden because every guy nearby will get a hard-on.
Quote from: misty on June 03, 2015, 10:49:38 AMIt is unfair. Breasts aren't sexual organs, but for some reason they have to be hidden because every guy nearby will get a hard-on.I can't believe I'm actually coming out with this sentence, but wouldn't that kind of be like...victim blaming?I mean, if men pop a stiffy simply because a woman decides to walk down the street bare chested then that's entirely on behalf of the man. If women's pussies started fermenting if I walked down the street bare chested (unlikely) and someone passed a law to stop men walking bare chested in public because it turns women on I certainly wouldn't appreciate it.
Women have functioning breasts, men don't. Tits have a sexual purpose whereas a bare man's chest doesn't.Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?
Quote from: Sprungli on June 03, 2015, 11:32:03 AMWomen have functioning breasts, men don't. Tits have a sexual purpose whereas a bare man's chest doesn't.Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?Tits are generally used as child rearing, not for sexual reproduction purposes. I really don't know why they're found to be sexual, but I'm sure there's a scientific reasoning for it.Not to mention, men's pectoral muscles are generally considered attractive to women depending on how toned they are. So no, the "sexualization" argument doesn't really hold up.
Quote from: Madman Mordo on June 03, 2015, 11:45:23 AMQuote from: Sprungli on June 03, 2015, 11:32:03 AMWomen have functioning breasts, men don't. Tits have a sexual purpose whereas a bare man's chest doesn't.Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?Tits are generally used as child rearing, not for sexual reproduction purposes. I really don't know why they're found to be sexual, but I'm sure there's a scientific reasoning for it.Not to mention, men's pectoral muscles are generally considered attractive to women depending on how toned they are. So no, the "sexualization" argument doesn't really hold up.I'm not talking about sexualisation, i'm talking about how breasts are directly related to sexual reproduction (which includes the process of rearing the young) and have been linked as something that is an indicator of partner suitability potential to men.Yes pecs are sexualised, but so is everything nowadays. Besides; tits are considered NSFW anyways because of religious and cultural reasons stretching back over a thousand years or more in Europe (and so, the US, AU, NZ, etc...). Speaking from a objective 21st century perspective there's not a great reason for them to be NSFW.
Quote from: Sprungli on June 03, 2015, 11:51:08 AMQuote from: Madman Mordo on June 03, 2015, 11:45:23 AMQuote from: Sprungli on June 03, 2015, 11:32:03 AMWomen have functioning breasts, men don't. Tits have a sexual purpose whereas a bare man's chest doesn't.Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?Tits are generally used as child rearing, not for sexual reproduction purposes. I really don't know why they're found to be sexual, but I'm sure there's a scientific reasoning for it.Not to mention, men's pectoral muscles are generally considered attractive to women depending on how toned they are. So no, the "sexualization" argument doesn't really hold up.I'm not talking about sexualisation, i'm talking about how breasts are directly related to sexual reproduction (which includes the process of rearing the young) and have been linked as something that is an indicator of partner suitability potential to men.Yes pecs are sexualised, but so is everything nowadays. Besides; tits are considered NSFW anyways because of religious and cultural reasons stretching back over a thousand years or more in Europe (and so, the US, AU, NZ, etc...). Speaking from a objective 21st century perspective there's not a great reason for them to be NSFW.Like I said, regardless of how sexual breasts are considered to be, that's not really a viable reason to maintain a censorious array of laws to keep them covered in public. Either neither gender should be allowed to display their chest in public, or both should be. I don't appreciate double standards.
Quote from: Sprungli on June 03, 2015, 11:32:03 AMWomen have functioning breasts, men don't. Tits have a sexual purpose whereas a bare man's chest doesn't.Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?wait what how does feeding a child does constitute as a sexual purpose?
Why would they be treated the same if they're totally different?
People should just post female foot pics instead.
If boobs are NSFW, but you work as a porn star -are they still NSFW?
Quote from: FatherlyNick on June 04, 2015, 07:49:57 AMIf boobs are NSFW, but you work as a porn star -are they still NSFW?Depends, if you were in a meeting or business situation yes. Otherwise...
Quote from: Sprungli on June 04, 2015, 01:58:37 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on June 04, 2015, 07:49:57 AMIf boobs are NSFW, but you work as a porn star -are they still NSFW?Depends, if you were in a meeting or business situation yes. Otherwise...But their business is sex.
Quote from: LC on June 04, 2015, 02:01:10 PMQuote from: Sprungli on June 04, 2015, 01:58:37 PMQuote from: FatherlyNick on June 04, 2015, 07:49:57 AMIf boobs are NSFW, but you work as a porn star -are they still NSFW?Depends, if you were in a meeting or business situation yes. Otherwise...But their business is sex.And race driver's is racing. They still have to deal with srs business
Why are women's breasts considered NSFW?
