I might just point out his stupidity every single time I respond to him now.
You have no consideration or empathy, apparently.
Quote from: Royal Light on January 05, 2015, 03:31:37 PMOn the other note: My Psychologist is most likely morally insane.Correct!
On the other note: My Psychologist is most likely morally insane.
Quote from: Verbatim on January 05, 2015, 03:34:24 PMI might just point out his stupidity every single time I respond to him now.You might annoy him, but I don't think that that will have much of an effect on him.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on January 05, 2015, 03:32:45 PMQuote from: Royal Light on January 05, 2015, 03:31:37 PMOn the other note: My Psychologist is most likely morally insane.Correct!What Brigg Myers personality are you?
Quote from: Verbatim on January 05, 2015, 03:21:46 PMYou have no consideration or empathy, apparently. Hmm, my psychiatrist was supposed to have fixed this. Pity they didn't then.
You are correct in thinking it won't really have much of an effect other than making you look bitter.
Quote from: Royal Light on January 05, 2015, 03:37:26 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on January 05, 2015, 03:32:45 PMQuote from: Royal Light on January 05, 2015, 03:31:37 PMOn the other note: My Psychologist is most likely morally insane.Correct!What Brigg Myers personality are you?INTJ/ISTJIt fluctuates.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on January 05, 2015, 03:37:38 PMYou are correct in thinking it won't really have much of an effect other than making you look bitter.And making me feel good. It pumps me up to know that I am smarter than you. By a large order of magnitude.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on January 05, 2015, 03:26:19 PMHowever, people saying X is ugly isn't against the rules in the same way that spamming up a thread with 'FUCK YOU FAGGOT' is. If it's someone, for example, making photoshops to mock another user from a picture they have posted - then of course, that is taken seriously and removed. If you are trying to equate 'X is ugly' with a three page flamewar then you need to get better at picking out balanced examples.My original contention was "I don't care if it's not a flamewar." It's rude and obnoxious to call someone ugly, period. I would never comment on anyone's appearance ever unless they did it to me first. And even that's irrational for me to do, but that's what I do when I'm pissed off. I bite back. Surprise surprise. And no one can really blame me for that.This is just a fundamental belief of mine. If you don't think that this thread is worth locking simply by its inherently inflammatory nature, then I think you are incredibly stupid. And this is gonna get nowhere. That's that.
However, people saying X is ugly isn't against the rules in the same way that spamming up a thread with 'FUCK YOU FAGGOT' is. If it's someone, for example, making photoshops to mock another user from a picture they have posted - then of course, that is taken seriously and removed. If you are trying to equate 'X is ugly' with a three page flamewar then you need to get better at picking out balanced examples.
Of course it's rude, but perhaps you don't understand - This isn't a hugbox. Just because something is inflammatory or rude doesn't mean it's up for immediate locking. 'Play nice' is a reminder not to turn it into some outright flamewar and to leave it as it always ends up, with users making fun of themselves or their friends.I get that you want this place ruled with an iron fist, it's just not going to happen though.Nor is your case helped by jumping to ad hominems when you disagree with someone.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on January 05, 2015, 03:42:09 PMOf course it's rude, but perhaps you don't understand - This isn't a hugbox. Just because something is inflammatory or rude doesn't mean it's up for immediate locking. 'Play nice' is a reminder not to turn it into some outright flamewar and to leave it as it always ends up, with users making fun of themselves or their friends.I get that you want this place ruled with an iron fist, it's just not going to happen though.Nor is your case helped by jumping to ad hominems when you disagree with someone.You realize that banning all inflammatory threads doesn't make the forum a hugbox, right? It would be a hugbox if all you allowed was threads like, "who is the cutest user." And nothing else. THAT would be a fucking hugbox. Also, I like how you use the term hugbox in general--it's associated with autism, so, you're basically cheating the argument by using such a charged word there. Calling someone autistic, even indirectly, is a surefire way to get people on your side on the Internet. Subtle.Point me to the ad hominems that I've made. I've called you stupid, because you are. That's not ad hominem, though.
*loading screens*Welp, that's news to me. I had no idea it was associated with autism, got a source for that?I would point them to you, but you've just immediately dismissed them so it looks like there isn't much point.
MFW a thread gets derailed
Verbatim, easily
Quote from: EnderWolf1013 on January 05, 2015, 03:51:44 PMMFW a thread gets derailedits not derailed, he's trying to win by personality.
Quote from: Comet on January 05, 2015, 03:56:35 PMQuote from: EnderWolf1013 on January 05, 2015, 03:51:44 PMMFW a thread gets derailedits not derailed, he's trying to win by personality.how is he going to win like that when half the site doesn't like his personality.
Who are the ugliest users here?
