But how would they have done it?
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 25, 2016, 06:30:05 PMBut how would they have done it?The highest number Trump carried any of the swing states was under 100,000. Scattered evenly, that's not that hard to conceal. In some states, that's under 2,000 per district. The NSA has issued a statement that this may indeed be the case. I don't think they would say that in a press conference if they thought it was nothing. But the real question is what do we do if this is true? Just installing Hillary is out. It would look like the Obama Administration nullified an election and chose their successor. Has a runoff ever happened before? And say we did solve that issue. What is our response to Russia?Like I said, And don't see a happy ending to this.
Quote from: MyNameIsCharlie on November 25, 2016, 07:02:47 PMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 25, 2016, 06:30:05 PMBut how would they have done it?The highest number Trump carried any of the swing states was under 100,000. Scattered evenly, that's not that hard to conceal. In some states, that's under 2,000 per district. The NSA has issued a statement that this may indeed be the case. I don't think they would say that in a press conference if they thought it was nothing. But the real question is what do we do if this is true? Just installing Hillary is out. It would look like the Obama Administration nullified an election and chose their successor. Has a runoff ever happened before? And say we did solve that issue. What is our response to Russia?Like I said, And don't see a happy ending to this.So how would they have stuffed the boxes?
lmao
They should. Otherwise we should attack Russia. They're bombing Syrians indiscriminately.
Quote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 07:06:13 PMis simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.lmao
is simply out of not wanting to go to war with us, which she would have caused.
Oh but mean old Assad is accused of using chemical weapons when, oh look, it was the Rebels all along. Quote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:32:42 PMThey should. Otherwise we should attack Russia. They're bombing Syrians indiscriminately.
how does that kool aid taste?
Assad did nothing wrong. The only reason the US intervened is because Russia is involved. Quote from: Azumarill on November 25, 2016, 08:42:39 PMhow does that kool aid taste?
yes assad is a wonderful benevolent leader who has never been responsible for anyone's suffering. praise be unto him!
Quote from: Ian on November 25, 2016, 08:31:40 PM>Implying Russia would back down to a No Fly Zone in the region of one of their allies that they're heavily involved in. The US is the aggressor here, there's no argument to this. Quote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMlmaoThey should. Otherwise we should attack Russia. They're bombing Syrians indiscriminately.
>Implying Russia would back down to a No Fly Zone in the region of one of their allies that they're heavily involved in. The US is the aggressor here, there's no argument to this. Quote from: challengerX on November 25, 2016, 08:10:43 PMlmao
Assume that Russia did actually interfere with the election, though. What would happen?
ISIS and Rebels are impossible to distinguish, I guess that's intentional on ISIS's part but it's regardless they're both enemies of Syria's state which Russia is allies with. Both ISIS and the Rebels are awful, we're talking about leaders eating the hearts of their fucking dead enemies. Oh but mean old Assad is accused of using chemical weapons when, oh look, it was the Rebels all along. Russia is not in the wrong here.
Obama, Erdogan, Hollande all previously spoke about a NFZ no one did it because it means war with Russia I don't see why it would be any different with Clinton.
IS and rebels are very easy to distinguish actually since IS doesn't accept the presence of any other groups in its territory, they force them to pledge allegiance and join them or they fight them. Also the rebel fighter eating an organ happened once, Assad's gas attack hurt thousands.
Obama is a fucking pussy who half-asses everything on international military concerns. Clinton went out of her way during her campaign to advocate for it in an effort to "punish" Russia just for supporting their ally.
There's two links in this thread showing the rebels are the ones using the chemical weapons. Of course only US news will say it's Assad because anything else would be a "Pro-Russian-Ally". The current US administration wants a war with Russia so fucking bad when Russia has done nothing to instigate it.
Trump campaigned against Obamacare and look what happened there. If you think America would go to all out war over Syria you're just silly.
One of them is RT so that's bs anyway, the Washington times article states there is no proof just "strong, concrete suspicions" they mention concrete but it's still a suspicion. On the other hand shortly after the attack happened in 2013 German Intel services listened in on a phone call with a Hezbollah operative and Iran where the former criticised Assads use even though Hezbollah are big supporters of the Regimehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10284773/Syria-crisis-chemical-weapons-use-a-big-mistake-Hizbollah-told-Iran.html
Wow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowd
I'm very Pro-American because an allied US with Russia will help with the Anglo-Sphere along with the UK and a slumbering Germany/France/Scandinavia that must wake up. However Obama/Clinton and the current administration is determined to prevent this from occurring at all costs. Including triggering an international military conflict and trying to scapegoat Russia who has been pushed back repeatedly simply for existing. Didn't want Crimea to happen? Maybe NATO shouldn't have gone back on their word of "We wont move missile defenses an inch closer to your border. :^)"Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on November 26, 2016, 05:52:20 AMWow, didn't think Ian was one of the "Russia did nothing wrong" crowd
What happens if Russia actually did steal the election for Trump?
