i wouldn't pick a dumb username like "CornEmotion" but otherwise this guy seems pretty based

however, he posted a whole paragraph in response to the "There would be no people without sexual desire" point, whereas i would only need to respond with a single word: "good"

Having no people would eliminate suffering in your eyes right? Would it not be better if each person chose to limit themselves to one natural born child, (not through laws or coercian, but through the awareness of the grave nature that overpopulation presents to the world)

This would result in a population of under a billion people within our lifetime. That would tackle every issue caused by overpopulation and would free up resources for each remaining individual to ensure they would live to their full potential with minimal suffering.

Quote from: Dan on May 30, 2019, 04:12:21 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on May 30, 2019, 03:52:15 PM

i wouldn't pick a dumb username like "CornEmotion" but otherwise this guy seems pretty based

however, he posted a whole paragraph in response to the "There would be no people without sexual desire" point, whereas i would only need to respond with a single word: "good"

Having no people would eliminate suffering in your eyes right? Why not just reduce the population by limiting each person to one natural born child, (not through laws or coercian, but through the awareness of the grave nature that overpopulation presents to the world)

This would result in a population of under a billion people within our lifetime. That would tackle every issue caused by overpopulation and would free up resources for each remaining individual to ensure they would live to their full potential with minimal suffering.

yeah man that’s working out great for China

Except in China it's simply a law without the awareness of why it's in place or why it's important.