The US (as we know it) doesn't exist

gats · September 18, 2016, 04:42:28 PM

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you all refer to as the US, is in fact, the jews, or as I've taken to calling it, jews plus US.

The US for instance has a central bank that is privately owned by the jews. The central bank prints money and the US borrows it at interest. The US has to ask the jews for money if it wants to do anything. This is one of the main ways the jews control the US.

Russia's economy is largely based on oil so the jews had the US crash the oil market. Russia is currently hurting but still surviving. The jews want to run an oil pipeline through Syria to bypass Russia and crash their economy... to force them under their control like the US is under their control. Iran, China etc etc all of these people are future targets of the jews and why the US calls them "evil" just like how Germany was supposedly "evil" because Hitler wanted to create a new German economy.

That's very basically where we are, the jew controlled world vs the independent world

Solonoid · September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM

In other news; Water: wet.

September 18, 2016, 04:45:30 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM

In other news; Water: wet.

oh god what have you done

Ingy · September 18, 2016, 04:45:37 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM

In other news; Water: wet.

Water is not wet

Solonoid · September 18, 2016, 04:49:52 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on September 18, 2016, 04:45:30 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
oh god what have you done

A shocking exposé I know, but somebody had to say it.

I'm ready to move to Russia and have a movie made about me now.

gats · September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM

In other news; Water: wet.

Water cannot be wet.

Solonoid · September 18, 2016, 04:51:33 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.

But it's covered in water.

That's the definition of wet.

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 04:52:40 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:45:37 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water is not wet

Water is the wettest thing possible.

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM

Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.

Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.

challengerX · September 18, 2016, 04:56:44 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Ingy · September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM

Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:00:12 PM

Quote from: challengerX on September 18, 2016, 04:56:44 PM

I'll do this again I don't give a fuck. It's not wet.

watch out, i have the strung-out degenerate wastoid on my side now

Doctor Doom · September 18, 2016, 05:00:21 PM

There is water under the ocean.

Powering the water.

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM

Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire

Fire IS on fire.

🂿 · September 18, 2016, 05:01:18 PM

Brb I'm packing my bags and going to Rapture.

Ingy · September 18, 2016, 05:02:38 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM
Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire
Fire IS on fire.

Things that give other things properties can not have those properties itself you faggot

gats · September 18, 2016, 05:03:16 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.

Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.

September 18, 2016, 05:05:21 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 05:02:38 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM
Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM
Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire
Fire IS on fire.

Things that give other things properties can not have those properties itself you faggot

I guess ice isn't cold, then

Dietrich Six · September 18, 2016, 05:05:43 PM

Quote from: Caped Baldy on September 18, 2016, 05:00:21 PM

There is water under the ocean.

Powering the water.

There are underwater rivers...

challengerX · September 18, 2016, 05:07:36 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:09:50 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 05:03:16 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM
Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.

Says you.

gats · September 18, 2016, 05:10:59 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:09:50 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 05:03:16 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM
Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.
Says you.

That's not an argument

DAS B00T x2 · September 18, 2016, 05:10:59 PM

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA

Ingy · September 18, 2016, 05:11:15 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on September 18, 2016, 05:05:21 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 05:02:38 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM
Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM
Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire
Fire IS on fire.

Things that give other things properties can not have those properties itself you faggot
I guess ice isn't cold, then

That example works but water still doesn't make itself wet

Being wet means it's "covered" in water
Water can't be "covered" in water
It's just merges into one thing

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:12:30 PM

Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 05:10:59 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:09:50 PM
Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 05:03:16 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 04:55:26 PM
Quote from: gats on September 18, 2016, 04:49:53 PM
Quote from: Sᴏʟᴏɴᴏɪᴅ on September 18, 2016, 04:44:28 PM
In other news; Water: wet.
Water cannot be wet.
Doors can't shut. Fire isn't hot.
Wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities.
Says you.
That's not an argument

Neither is "wet as an adjective can only be applied to non-water entities." That's just a claim--says you. Why should I believe you?

September 18, 2016, 05:12:45 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 05:11:15 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on September 18, 2016, 05:05:21 PM
Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 05:02:38 PM
Quote from: Verbatim on September 18, 2016, 05:00:34 PM
Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM
Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire
Fire IS on fire.

Things that give other things properties can not have those properties itself you faggot
I guess ice isn't cold, then

That example works but water still doesn't make itself wet

Being wet means it's "covered" in water
Water can't be "covered" in water
It's just merges into one thing

your maxim of "something that gives a property can't have that property" is pretty much made up

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:13:34 PM

Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on September 18, 2016, 05:10:59 PM

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA

0.9... = 1

Turkey · September 18, 2016, 05:13:51 PM

A better question: is a single molecule of water wet?

Verbatim · September 18, 2016, 05:17:22 PM

Quote from: TurquíaHiriente on September 18, 2016, 05:13:51 PM

A better question: is a single molecule of water wet?

I would say no.

Wetness implies the existence of at least two entities--one of them being water, the other being virtually anything.

Solonoid · September 18, 2016, 05:18:00 PM

Quote from: N i g g e r s on September 18, 2016, 04:59:28 PM

Water gives other things the property of being wet
It is not wet itself

Like how fire can't be on fire

Considering the fact the fire is plasmafied gas, it can be on fire.

When I light a butane lighter, the butane ignites the oxygen which is touching the butane.
Therefore there is fire, on fire.