Sandtrap implied that physical strength in general is a gender-exclusive trait. Just because men are stronger than women on average doesn't make this true.
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 08:42:40 PMSandtrap implied that physical strength in general is a gender-exclusive trait. Just because men are stronger than women on average doesn't make this true.It's not gender-exclusive, not at all, but a man and peak physical strength will always be stronger than a woman trained in the same vein. That certainly isn't to say a woman can't achieve awesome feats of strength (Tons of women who train competitively are stronger than the average man), but the male body is just biologically more inclined towards that sort of activity.
You're not an ugly dude by any means, just do these things. Cut your hair.Hit the gym.And you'll be fucking college girls in no time. Good luck.
Quote from: Verbatim on October 28, 2016, 10:57:18 AMwunderlist?
wunderlist
Quote from: challengerX on October 28, 2016, 12:10:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on October 28, 2016, 10:57:18 AMwunderlist?an e-todo list, something i'd imagine loaf would usei just thought of the twinkiest thing i could muster
Quote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive trait
Nice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.
Quote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 11:47:07 PMQuote from: Sαndtrap on October 27, 2016, 11:37:41 PMNice to see sep7agon can still host a bonfire without the use of matches.If ya want some context Class, while you're right that women can be as strong as men, you're missing stuff. Strength comes naturally for guys. That's not bravado. It's science. Hormones and chemical make-up. Males have a higher drive due to testosterone and their instinctual aggressiveness. They're more prone to harsher things which neccessitates a stronger physiology.Any body builder is going to be stronger than the average joe. That accounts for either sex. But if you look at averages? An average guy and an average girl? There's an easy to see gap. And what if you look at body builder women? Well, you'll notice some of them don't look so womanly anymore. They look like guys.And even then, if we're looking at the extremes? I don't think I've ever heard of a woman body builder who could come closs to the levels of strength that Lois Cyr displayed. If you can find me one, then hey, knowledge is cool.But you can't argue that guys fit the role of strength. If we didn't, we wouldn't need so much testosterone or instinctual aggressiveness.We DONT need testosterone or aggressivenessa truly moral society is 100% passive all the timeand yeah, obviously the average male is stronger than the average female, the problem is when you conflating physicality with masculinity as if it was a gender exclusive traitas if women are the paragon of moralityhave you ever seen them fightclaws, biting and blood, not nice
Quote from: Winy on October 28, 2016, 09:51:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on October 27, 2016, 08:42:40 PMSandtrap implied that physical strength in general is a gender-exclusive trait. Just because men are stronger than women on average doesn't make this true.It's not gender-exclusive, not at all, but a man and peak physical strength will always be stronger than a woman trained in the same vein. That certainly isn't to say a woman can't achieve awesome feats of strength (Tons of women who train competitively are stronger than the average man), but the male body is just biologically more inclined towards that sort of activity.can you readI never argued against this
please judge my new selfie
