Quote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:13:20 PMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.Yep, that's why he suits Star Wars so well. He's talented and he just knows how to make a good movie, I thought the Star Trek films were brilliant (but un-Star Trekky)the star trek films just took all the life out of star trek... star trek is about exploration, finding a new way for life, the exciting prospects of venturing into the unknown. it's a really optimistic adventure around the galaxy. the star trek movies feel like terrible fanfiction. especially Into Darkness.
Quote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.Yep, that's why he suits Star Wars so well. He's talented and he just knows how to make a good movie, I thought the Star Trek films were brilliant (but un-Star Trekky)
Quote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.
Quote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.
Really like the opening shotThat sense of scale
Quote from: Azumarill on April 16, 2015, 02:40:12 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:13:20 PMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.Yep, that's why he suits Star Wars so well. He's talented and he just knows how to make a good movie, I thought the Star Trek films were brilliant (but un-Star Trekky)the star trek films just took all the life out of star trek... star trek is about exploration, finding a new way for life, the exciting prospects of venturing into the unknown. it's a really optimistic adventure around the galaxy. the star trek movies feel like terrible fanfiction. especially Into Darkness.The third one might be alright
Quote from: TBlocks on April 16, 2015, 03:14:34 PMLots of passive aggressiveness itt. >.>It's not canon
Lots of passive aggressiveness itt. >.>
I don't see why people are complaining that the Imperial equipment and such is really shiny. The Entire was always pretty clean looking in comparison to everythjgn else, it's what distinguishes them from a universe filled with worn and grimy equipment.
Quote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.I really don't see this. They're nothing alike. Just because a movie has action in space doesn't mean it's a Star Wars rip off. The new Star Trek films are their own breed of shit.
Quote from: Tackelberry on April 16, 2015, 04:52:50 PMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.I really don't see this. They're nothing alike. Just because a movie has action in space doesn't mean it's a Star Wars rip off. The new Star Trek films are their own breed of shit.Have you ever watched the older Star Trek films?
However, the new Star Trek films are an insult to the old movies and TV show. It's like if they took Star Wars, and turned the series into "The Housewives of Coruscant".
Quote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 04:55:07 PMQuote from: Tackelberry on April 16, 2015, 04:52:50 PMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.I really don't see this. They're nothing alike. Just because a movie has action in space doesn't mean it's a Star Wars rip off. The new Star Trek films are their own breed of shit.Have you ever watched the older Star Trek films?Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with the new films being like Star Wars. The new films are not like Star Wars at all, except for the fact there's space and lasers in them.However, the new Star Trek films are an insult to the old movies and TV show. It's like if they took Star Wars, and turned the series into "The Housewives of Coruscant".
Quote from: TBlocks on April 16, 2015, 03:14:34 PMLots of passive aggressiveness itt. >.>I'm more interested in some of the weebs itt talking smack about Star Wars.
Quote from: Korra Valentine on April 16, 2015, 06:27:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on April 16, 2015, 03:14:34 PMLots of passive aggressiveness itt. >.>I'm more interested in some of the weebs itt talking smack about Star Wars.That was the aggressiveness I was talkin' about.Not so passive now that I look at it again >.>
Quote from: Tackelberry on April 16, 2015, 04:59:57 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 04:55:07 PMQuote from: Tackelberry on April 16, 2015, 04:52:50 PMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on April 16, 2015, 02:08:06 PMQuote from: Sprungli on April 16, 2015, 02:04:43 PMQuote from: Septy on April 16, 2015, 01:51:41 PMReally like the opening shotThat sense of scaleThe cinematography is superb, even if the film flops with star wars fans I feel as if it'll be a quality film. Abrams's style suits Star Wars well, both of the Star Trek films felt so much less like ST and more like SW anyways-it's probably part of the reason they did well.Star Trek isn't as much about the action as it is about the diplomacy, trying to talk things out.Abrams' ST films were Star Wars ripoffs frankly. So much action in them.I really don't see this. They're nothing alike. Just because a movie has action in space doesn't mean it's a Star Wars rip off. The new Star Trek films are their own breed of shit.Have you ever watched the older Star Trek films?Yes, but that doesn't have anything to do with the new films being like Star Wars. The new films are not like Star Wars at all, except for the fact there's space and lasers in them.However, the new Star Trek films are an insult to the old movies and TV show. It's like if they took Star Wars, and turned the series into "The Housewives of Coruscant".The style of the films is Star Wars-esque, the manner in which things are executed and presented veer off closer to SW than ST. The way they favour action and drama to exploration and discovery.
All of the rumors I have read have proven true. I remember reading one about someone who salvaged Vader's helmet, and that the desert planet is not Tatooine, which Abrams confirmed today. It's called Jakku and has relics from the Galactic Civil War. Obviously something important is there to get the new Imperial Remnant's attention.
>all these degenerates now jumping on the hype train despite having doubts when the teaser came outfuck off. I always had hope with jew jew abrams.
Quote from: Madman Mordo on April 17, 2015, 05:37:25 AM>all these degenerates now jumping on the hype train despite having doubts when the teaser came outfuck off. I always had hope with jew jew abrams.Probably because the first teaser showed a bunch of nothing and didn't get people hyped up. Not even seeing the Falcon doing loop-di-loops to the old Star Wars theme got me hyped.Now that we actually have a hint of what's going down, NOW I'm excited.
New Star Wars Episode VII Teaser Trailer
