Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 10, 2017, 01:49:24 PMQuote from: Flee on March 10, 2017, 01:32:36 PMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 10, 2017, 01:24:12 PMPost it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.Damn. What makes you think I'm wrong?Because I say so.Well shit. If I hurry I can probably still have it pulled before too many people read it.
Quote from: Flee on March 10, 2017, 01:32:36 PMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 10, 2017, 01:24:12 PMPost it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.Damn. What makes you think I'm wrong?Because I say so.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on March 10, 2017, 01:24:12 PMPost it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.Damn. What makes you think I'm wrong?
Post it here when it's published so far I can tell you why you're wrong.
standards and best practices to asses
Quote from: Risay117 on March 10, 2017, 07:01:21 PMWhat journal edition is it coming out in? Also what was the topic of your paper?Sent from my ONE A2005 using TapatalkIt's scheduled to be in one of the Spring editions, so it'll be out any time now. Very generally put, the paper conducts an adequacy evaluation and impact assessment of international and European legislation, standards and best practices to asses predictive and automated intelligence analysis in deep and dark web environments, as well as issue some policy recommendations following conversations I've had with government analysts and such. As I said, not something many of you would be interested in reading anyways.
What journal edition is it coming out in? Also what was the topic of your paper?Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk