Liberals of the forum

You know full well it's the fact that you're posting that makes people call it out as bait.

If I made a post with the same content,  nobody would reckon it to be bait.

But you wouldn't make that post with the same content.

I broadly agree with the points he made. Although,  it's quite obvious he'd set out to make a caricature of those opinions, as opposed to representing them properly.

Quite. I have no problem having this discussion if the intent of the OP [judging by the language used] is actually interested in having this discussion. It's quite obvious that Kinder isn't.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Democrats, Greens, Socialists, and everybody else; if there was a logical way to show the right side of the spectrum was superior and actually did a better job to help the populace, would you switch or stay?

Want a real answer?

There's no way to show that the right [at least in the US] is superior when they are against equal treatment under the law, against drug legalization, against abortion, and against welfare, yet pride themselves on upholding freedom and the Constitution.


I don't see what economic choices made by those politicians that could make up for that.



Sorry. No.

he'd set out to make a caricature of those opinions, as opposed to representing them properly.

>assumptions

I don't have opinions on most things, I just like to argue things that are unpopular. The only real opinion I have is that I'm not in the position to argue the things I have no experience with.

>doesn't have an opinion
>throws a tantrum like a 5 year-old

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

he'd set out to make a caricature of those opinions, as opposed to representing them properly.

>assumptions

I don't have opinions on most things, I just like to argue things that are unpopular. The only real opinion I have is that I'm not in the position to argue the things I have no experience with.

>doesn't have an opinion
>throws a tantrum like a 5 year-old

Making a large, colorful display isn't throwing a tantrum.

It absolutely is.

Just to clear this up.

This is bait and it's bordering on a shitpost too.
But it's not muh 'librul bias oh noes' that's the reason it's bait, it's because it makes the assumption that one political view is correct and superior. The same would apply if someone said
'Republicans, Conservatives, Capitalists, and everybody else; if there was a logical way to show the left side of the spectrum was superior and actually did a better job to help the populace, would you switch or stay?'
It's low quality bait.

It isn't bait. It's posing a question that if the right were better, would people join or stay on the left

>tfw already on right

Same here. Most ethical standards liberals want to achieve aren't practical or beneficial.

>Women should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want
Yeah they should, but unless they actually want to increase their chance of rape, then they need to make a compromise. The real world really doesn't care about your feelings.

We don't live in the dark ages, women should be allowed to show more than just their hands and face without the threat of rape. Not the victims fault if a rapist can't control themselves.

I won't even address the rest of your of bait.

Except humans are animals and have sexual urges. If a girl is going to wear booty shorts and a bikini top then she WILL get more attention than a girl wearing baggy jeans and a long shirt. If you're going to wear the former then don't fucking complain about getting looks because it will happen. Jay is the perfect example of this: She doesn't want women to be looked at in certain manners yet will post pics that consisting of 80% of her cleavage

>tfw already on right

Same here. Most ethical standards liberals want to achieve aren't practical or beneficial.

>Women should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want
Yeah they should, but unless they actually want to increase their chance of rape, then they need to make a compromise. The real world really doesn't care about your feelings.

We don't live in the dark ages, women should be allowed to show more than just their hands and face without the threat of rape. Not the victims fault if a rapist can't control themselves.

I won't even address the rest of your of bait.

Except humans are animals and have sexual urges. If a girl is going to wear booty shorts and a bikini top then she WILL get more attention than a girl wearing baggy jeans and a long shirt. If you're going to wear the former then don't fucking complain about getting looks because it will happen. Jay is the perfect example of this: She doesn't want women to be looked at in certain manners yet will post pics that consisting of 80% of her cleavage

Except there's a pretty major difference between looking at someone and raping someone.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

>tfw already on right

Same here. Most ethical standards liberals want to achieve aren't practical or beneficial.

>Women should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want
Yeah they should, but unless they actually want to increase their chance of rape, then they need to make a compromise. The real world really doesn't care about your feelings.

We don't live in the dark ages, women should be allowed to show more than just their hands and face without the threat of rape. Not the victims fault if a rapist can't control themselves.

I won't even address the rest of your of bait.

Except humans are animals and have sexual urges. If a girl is going to wear booty shorts and a bikini top then she WILL get more attention than a girl wearing baggy jeans and a long shirt. If you're going to wear the former then don't fucking complain about getting looks because it will happen. Jay is the perfect example of this: She doesn't want women to be looked at in certain manners yet will post pics that consisting of 80% of her cleavage

Getting looks =/= Holding someone down and shoving your cock inside them

I know when a woman looks at you, you cum yourself instantly, but it usually takes a bit more for others.

There is no need to be upset.

Try to soothe yourself and refrain from using autistic as an insult.

>tfw already on right

Same here. Most ethical standards liberals want to achieve aren't practical or beneficial.

>Women should be able to wear whatever they want, wherever they want
Yeah they should, but unless they actually want to increase their chance of rape, then they need to make a compromise. The real world really doesn't care about your feelings.

We don't live in the dark ages, women should be allowed to show more than just their hands and face without the threat of rape. Not the victims fault if a rapist can't control themselves.

I won't even address the rest of your of bait.

Except humans are animals and have sexual urges. If a girl is going to wear booty shorts and a bikini top then she WILL get more attention than a girl wearing baggy jeans and a long shirt. If you're going to wear the former then don't fucking complain about getting looks because it will happen. Jay is the perfect example of this: She doesn't want women to be looked at in certain manners yet will post pics that consisting of 80% of her cleavage

I know when a woman looks at you, you cum yourself instantly, but it usually takes a bit more for others.

I know whenever people read your posts, their IQ drops by a point.

The rules apply to everyone <.<

Apparently you didn't get the message the first time.

Well this sure has been a riveting discussion...

Aaaand that's a warning for the both of you.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Also, Mr. Optometrist. I was going to edit my post already. Didn't need you.

Also, Mr. Optometrist. I was going to edit my post already. Didn't need you.

My jimmies are eternal.

Aaaand that's a warning for the both of you.

HOW IS THAT A FUCKING WARNING FOR ME? I didn't even call him anything.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

More than who is willing to fuck you.


FUCK YOU I DON'T EVEN CARE IF YOU EDITED

Aaaand that's a warning for the both of you.

HOW IS THAT A FUCKING WARNING FOR ME? I didn't even call him anything.

For calling him autistic twice.