Last thread on the subject

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

No fucking shit that paedophiles who molested children viewed CP and vis versa. CP is utterly wrong with zero basis for argument.

What isn't CP is the fucking lolispam that seems to tweak your bonnet so, it's a fucking cartoon and it's getting ridiculously tiring to see you equating the two or claiming that lolispam is a gateway to actual CP.

Am I going to become someone who watches bestgore 24/7 because I love gory films? Am I going to become a serial killer if I do? This is how fallacious your argument is. You are doing the same old shit that the media pulls on violent video games but applying it to what perverts draw in their basements.

Jesus christ with a cross up his shrektum, will you give this malarkey a rest?

Once again, this is just another side argument, I don't care if you don't agree with me on the loli argument. Once again, this thread has to do with the people who hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options of this thread and why in the hell you and everyone else are defending them.

Because you are making a mother fucking strawman out of this, that's why.

You want me to do a piecemeal point for your precious four points? Here we fucking go.

It's okay for nude pictures of teens and kids to circulate the internet
-Not okay, zero discussion.
It's okay for nude pictures of teens 14+ to circulate the internet
-Not okay, partial discussion as AoC Laws vary from country to country. That's the trouble with the internet. On a personal level, I don't think they should.
The AoC should be significantly lower so younger people can have relationships with older people
Up for discussion as this is deliberately vague, your view of significantly lower could be either 2 years or 10. Clarify it for a clarified response.
It's okay to spread nude photos of children around because they shouldn't have taken the photo in the first place
Of course it's not okay, and this argument is another example of the ridiculous strawman you have going.

You then blanket it off with this 'I don't agree with any of the above stances' and expect everyone to vote properly on a stupid poll rather than clog it up with stupid answers to further prolong this farce.

This isn't meant to include everyone's opinions on the issue, clearly. I listed four opinions to see who agreed with them. And it appears as if there are multiple people that do and here you are still defending them.

My last point - People will vote for the four options simply to prolong this fucking farce.
I'm not defending those four points either, I'm pointing out the flaws in your stupid logic and how you keep trying to extend this to cover lolis. I find it all distasteful, but I'm not going to have some idiot shit all over people I like to talk to simply because of some picture/gif spamming they did a while back. So if you want to split this thread at this point, be my guest.

Once again, I'm not defending the four points but I am providing counter-points to the extensions and >implications you have previously thrown towards lolicons.

To put it even more simply, find another group to lynch you insufferable SJW phaggot.

Or post the troll face and claim this was a ruse simply to raise my blood pressure.

So, why are you assuming the answers to the poll are serious?

A moot question, really. Mostly because people have been arguing about those opinions in past threads.

I agree, the question really is moot.

Now, give a proper reason for assuming the five people who answered with the undesirable options are absolutely truthful.

Whats SJW stand for?

I'm gonna have to agree with Dustin on this issue. If you find little kids attractive, you need to seek help ASAP.

Indeed, that's not up for discussion at all.

And I'll actually give you kudos for not suggesting that they are all simply shot for finding them attractive but are instead sent for proper professional help ._.

Whats SJW stand for?

Social Justice Warrior, it's the malignant breed of Tumblrites that seem to be infecting the whole fucking internet lately.

Whats SJW stand for?

Social Justice Warrior.

It's a pejorative for people who are overly concerned with social justice to the point of ridiculousness. See: people on tumblr who talk about cultural appropriation, fat acceptance, white/male privilege and triggers.

Whats SJW stand for?

Social Justice Warrior.

It's a pejorative for people who are overly concerned with social justice to the point of ridiculousness. See: people on tumblr who talk about cultural appropriation, fat acceptance, white/male privilege and triggers.

You put it so much more eloquently than I.

I'm gonna have to agree with Dustin on this issue. If you find little kids attractive, you need to seek help ASAP.

That's not what anybody has been saying though, look at the poll. Dustin is going after this whole forum because a few people said America should change it's age of consent laws to be like Europe's.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

My fucking face when this thread.



Congrats dustbin, ITT you'd destroyed any residual respect that I actually had for you.

*attempts to resist the next inevitable baiting hook*

No fucking shit that paedophiles who molested children viewed CP and vis versa. CP is utterly wrong with zero basis for argument.

What isn't CP is the fucking lolispam that seems to tweak your bonnet so, it's a fucking cartoon and it's getting ridiculously tiring to see you equating the two or claiming that lolispam is a gateway to actual CP.

Am I going to become someone who watches bestgore 24/7 because I love gory films? Am I going to become a serial killer if I do? This is how fallacious your argument is. You are doing the same old shit that the media pulls on violent video games but applying it to what perverts draw in their basements.

Jesus christ with a cross up his shrektum, will you give this malarkey a rest?

Once again, this is just another side argument, I don't care if you don't agree with me on the loli argument. Once again, this thread has to do with the people who hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options of this thread and why in the hell you and everyone else are defending them.

Because you are making a mother fucking strawman out of this, that's why.

You want me to do a piecemeal point for your precious four points? Here we fucking go.

It's okay for nude pictures of teens and kids to circulate the internet
-Not okay, zero discussion.
It's okay for nude pictures of teens 14+ to circulate the internet
-Not okay, partial discussion as AoC Laws vary from country to country. That's the trouble with the internet. On a personal level, I don't think they should.
The AoC should be significantly lower so younger people can have relationships with older people
Up for discussion as this is deliberately vague, your view of significantly lower could be either 2 years or 10. Clarify it for a clarified response.
It's okay to spread nude photos of children around because they shouldn't have taken the photo in the first place
Of course it's not okay, and this argument is another example of the ridiculous strawman you have going.

You then blanket it off with this 'I don't agree with any of the above stances' and expect everyone to vote properly on a stupid poll rather than clog it up with stupid answers to further prolong this farce.

This isn't meant to include everyone's opinions on the issue, clearly. I listed four opinions to see who agreed with them. And it appears as if there are multiple people that do and here you are still defending them.

My last point - People will vote for the four options simply to prolong this fucking farce.
I'm not defending those four points either, I'm pointing out the flaws in your stupid logic and how you keep trying to extend this to cover lolis. I find it all distasteful, but I'm not going to have some idiot shit all over people I like to talk to simply because of some picture/gif spamming they did a while back. So if you want to split this thread at this point, be my guest.

Once again, I'm not defending the four points but I am providing counter-points to the extensions and >implications you have previously thrown towards lolicons.

To put it even more simply, find another group to lynch you insufferable SJW phaggot.

Or post the troll face and claim this was a ruse simply to raise my blood pressure.

This thread hardly has to do with the loli shit, as I've countlessly said. If you want to hate me because I think it's wrong go ahead. If you don't agree with the four points and you're still here trying your damned hardest to insult me then it would appear you are only doing this for your reputation. And I'm doing this despite that, so what does that make you and me?

See my final post, your bait lost it's appeal.

You almost lured me back in with the reputation bit, but in the words of Tarantino 'I'm not biting'.

It's been fun in the loosest sense of the word.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

You're just being ridiculous now and asking me to do something you know I can't do.

No, Dustin.

The ridiculous thing here is your initial assumption that the results of this poll would be even remotely reliable.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

See my final post, your bait lost it's appeal.

You almost lured me back in with the reputation bit, but in the words of Tarantino 'I'm not biting'.

It's been fun in the loosest sense of the word.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Cool story. It's not up to me to prove the people who voted are just trolling, nor is it even necessary.

>Makes claim
>"It's not up to me to prove that it's true."

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

To think you actually think I'm trolling or baiting because I'm concerned that people hold the top four poll options. Yeah I can't wait to tell #offtopic how horrible this offsite has become.

We're horrible? you're the douchefuck who is assuming a whole forum is a pedo paradise for the actions of 5 faggots who can't keep their loli fetishes to themselves, YOU'RE the horrible person, and YOU are the cancer of this forum, kindly log off and never come back.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

See my final post, your bait lost it's appeal.

You almost lured me back in with the reputation bit, but in the words of Tarantino 'I'm not biting'.

It's been fun in the loosest sense of the word.

Then I guess I will keep you muted now if to you [url]I'm a troll for being concerned with the exploitation of children[/u]. I'm sure you don't actually think that, but you have a reputation you need to care about.

*breaks the seal*

Top. Fucking. Kek.

Mute me then you sad little SJW.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

See my final post, your bait lost it's appeal.

You almost lured me back in with the reputation bit, but in the words of Tarantino 'I'm not biting'.

It's been fun in the loosest sense of the word.

Then I guess I will keep you muted now if to you [url]I'm a troll for being concerned with the exploitation of children[/u]. I'm sure you don't actually think that, but you have a reputation you need to care about.

Why are you completely incapable of grasping this?

Over the past few weeks you've spewed forth all manner of utter bullshit. And this one originally started with you blowing something way out of proportion. You're making this into a huge deal, when, evidently, the exploitation of children isn't at all, to even a minimal fucking degree, an issue to be concerned about on a fucking off-site forum of a video-game developer.

Just think about the fucking lunacy at the bedrock of this. I can understand not wanting children to be exploited or molested, really, I can. That's not our problem here. Our problem is the insufferable way in which you approach this, the unbearable sanctimony and the absolutely ridiculous levels of naysaying you're performing against this forum, as if you're the only bastion of what's good and proper here.

Most of us are tired of it. So, really, if there's a massive moral dilemma in this forum that, for some fucking reason, you perceive and it's giving you trouble. Then do everybody a favour and fuck off.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

-I don't know what the fuck happened to my post there-

>Still not muted me

And I actually redact that remark, you can't be an actual SJW or this wouldn't have happened. And either you did that, which makes you a subhuman piece of shit for leaking it. Or LC is having a jolly old giggle at everyone's expense. Somehow I'm more inclined to believe him than you after several week long shitfest you seem to be throwing.

Except a poll is not a claim, dumbass. Meta is just trying to draw attention away from the results by saying I can't validate no one is trolling.

The poll is your only piece of evidence you have to support you claim. Besides, there aren't even any votes for the ones actually involving children, how do you know if the people who weren't trolling aren't just European where the age of consent ranges from 14-16 with only a few exceptions.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

YouTube

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.