and we should change human to huwoman
There's no need to change OUR word to eliminate similiarities to the lesser sexinstead, "man" should be changed to "subwoman"
Either way, "man" and "woman" have separate etymologies and it's pure coincidence that they are similar.
But if women are superior how did patriarchy happen?
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on February 28, 2017, 07:41:06 AMBut if women are superior how did patriarchy happen?if jesus was a being of pure light how did he get crucified
You're a man
Quote from: Töqi on February 28, 2017, 05:55:40 AMEither way, "man" and "woman" have separate etymologies and it's pure coincidence that they are similar.i thought it was an "every fruit is an apple" type situation
Quote from: Verbatim on February 28, 2017, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Töqi on February 28, 2017, 05:55:40 AMEither way, "man" and "woman" have separate etymologies and it's pure coincidence that they are similar.i thought it was an "every fruit is an apple" type situationI'm not really sure what that means.
Quote from: Töqi on February 28, 2017, 12:04:44 PMQuote from: Verbatim on February 28, 2017, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Töqi on February 28, 2017, 05:55:40 AMEither way, "man" and "woman" have separate etymologies and it's pure coincidence that they are similar.i thought it was an "every fruit is an apple" type situationI'm not really sure what that means.i thought there was a time where "man" just meant person, and "wo" was appended later to help differentiatei'm not privy to the details but that's just what i've read
Quote from: rC on February 28, 2017, 08:55:12 AMYou're a manyou need balls or a dick to be a man
Fun fact, the etymology of the words man and woman are independent of one another, and woman is in no way to derived from them modern word man.
girly boy lady man
It shouldn't be "womyn"
