Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?There's so much wrong with this post that I don't even know where to start.
I remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:53:01 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:52:22 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:49:02 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature1)https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy2) that's hardly applicable here anywayYou're saying we should ban circumcision because it's not natural, so yes it does apply.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:52:22 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:49:02 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature1)https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/the-fallacy-fallacy2) that's hardly applicable here anyway
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:49:02 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for you
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionary
Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:54:51 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:54:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionaryAnd thus wrong to force upon someone. little kids don't want shots either yet parents force those upon them
Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:54:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionaryAnd thus wrong to force upon someone.
Hasnt this been argued over in serious.
Quote from: Imouto on January 12, 2015, 08:58:11 AMHasnt this been argued over in serious.yes but this is humorous
Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:54:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionaryso every bloke should be circumcised just in the off chance he might develop phimosis?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 09:00:45 AMQuote from: Imouto on January 12, 2015, 08:58:11 AMHasnt this been argued over in serious.yes but this is humorousYeah...arguing for circumcision is funny.Its just wrong.
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:56:51 AMunjustifiable in the Western world.>acting like circumcision is some kind of horrible evil thing>acting like it's really that big of a dealJust because there are few reasons (aesthetic, minor health issues) to keep it legal does not mean it should be made illegal.
unjustifiable in the Western world.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.It takes up to half an hour of a baby being strapped down to a table while a part of its penis is being cut off. Something that, unsurprisingly, hurts like a mofo.
Except a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.
Quote from: BritishLemön on January 12, 2015, 08:59:13 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:54:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionaryso every bloke should be circumcised just in the off chance he might develop phimosis? no that's why I s
Okay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 09:04:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:56:51 AMunjustifiable in the Western world.>acting like circumcision is some kind of horrible evil thing>acting like it's really that big of a dealJust because there are few reasons (aesthetic, minor health issues) to keep it legal does not mean it should be made illegal.Yes, yes, and yes it does.Okay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:56:51 AMunjustifiable in the Western world.>acting like circumcision is some kind of horrible evil thing>acting like it's really that big of a dealJust because there are few reasons (aesthetic, minor health issues) to keep it legal does not mean it should be made illegal.Yes, yes, and yes it does.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 12, 2015, 09:07:36 AMThe only people who should have a say in the circumcision debate are women and fags, and we all agree that a nice cut looks better than a god damn earthworm turkey baster looking thing.Cutfags - 1Europoors - 0Come now, we both know you were aroused by what I posted in anarchy a while back.
The only people who should have a say in the circumcision debate are women and fags, and we all agree that a nice cut looks better than a god damn earthworm turkey baster looking thing.Cutfags - 1Europoors - 0
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 09:09:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 09:08:06 AMOkay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?lol, didn't I already explain how those aren't comparable?"It's not comparable" is a one all end all copy and paste argument I've seen be used for everything. All you've been able to accomplish here is saying that circumcision should be banned because it's not natural, which is honestly quite hypocritical coming from a homosexual.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 09:08:06 AMOkay then, what else should we ban because the only reason to keep it legal is for aesthetic reasons? Hair dye? Razor blades? Spray tans?lol, didn't I already explain how those aren't comparable?
>looks betterBoot pls.
If you weren't circumcised you should probably kill yourself
