Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?
>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.
Quote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:40:03 AMITT: Dick DiscussionTruly the best kind of discussion. We should get Icy in here, he's probably quite knowledgable.
ITT: Dick Discussion
Quote from: Flee on January 12, 2015, 08:40:40 AMQuote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:40:03 AMITT: Dick DiscussionTruly the best kind of discussion. We should get Icy in here, he's probably quite knowledgable.steamy
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.
Quote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:41:04 AMQuote from: Flee on January 12, 2015, 08:40:40 AMQuote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:40:03 AMITT: Dick DiscussionTruly the best kind of discussion. We should get Icy in here, he's probably quite knowledgable.steamyBump an old thread, get insecure people mad. What a lovely way to start the morning!
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:42:52 AMQuote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:41:04 AMQuote from: Flee on January 12, 2015, 08:40:40 AMQuote from: Jill Valentine on January 12, 2015, 08:40:03 AMITT: Dick DiscussionTruly the best kind of discussion. We should get Icy in here, he's probably quite knowledgable.steamyBump an old thread, get insecure people mad. What a lovely way to start the morning!>implying I'm insecure>implying you shouldn't be insecure about your squid dick
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:34:22 AMQuote from: Z̼ͤ̓̒ͅḛ̸̻͉͙͚̤̌̔̉̍͘n̷̡͛͐͐ on December 16, 2014, 01:44:54 PMJealous because masturbation is not as pleasurable for you. It isn't?Thousands more nerve endings still intact bro.
Quote from: Z̼ͤ̓̒ͅḛ̸̻͉͙͚̤̌̔̉̍͘n̷̡͛͐͐ on December 16, 2014, 01:44:54 PMJealous because masturbation is not as pleasurable for you. It isn't?
Jealous because masturbation is not as pleasurable for you.
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for you
I remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:49:02 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature
Quote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:47:17 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:43:59 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:42:38 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:40:46 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:39:29 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:37:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:36:29 AMQuote from: Dustin xLilD on January 12, 2015, 08:33:02 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on December 16, 2014, 01:41:35 PM>Being upset about the Human anatomy.Shouldn't you complain that women should cut one of their breasts off too, because that's aesthetically pleasing or some shit?So essentially you're saying is that we should ban ear piercings, nail clippers, razors, haircuts, and shampoo because it's wrong to modify your body for an aesthetic reason?No, it's wrong for someone else to modify your body for aesthetic reasons.Okay, so children under 18 should be banned from getting ear piercings, manicures/pedicures, and dying their hair different colors?Great job butchering that poor code.Those are temporary at best, but they're hardly comparable to amputation.Unless your dick was the size of an arm or leg when you were young, circumcision is no where near comparable to an amputation.Circumcision is an amputation by definition, pretty much.Same with ear piercings, faggot>equating an ear piercing with outright removal of the earwatthis is bad logic even for youExcept a circumcision is not a big procedure, in fact it takes less than a minute.Okay, here's a hypothetical for you. A child is born with 6 fingers on one hand. The extra finger isn't harmful for the child, but he thinks he would look better if he only had five. By your logic, he shouldn't be allowed to have the surgery solely because it's an amputation for an aesthetic reason on a child.A normal part of the human anatomy is hardly comparable to a deformity.
Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications
Quote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionary
Quote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:54:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on January 12, 2015, 08:51:54 AMQuote from: Tyger on January 12, 2015, 08:49:32 AMI remember my circumcision, it was...Oh wait!My grandfather had phimosis as a teenager so he had to get curcumcised then, and said it was horrible. Why would I want my kids to be subjected to suffering they will remember over one they will cry about for 3 minutes and then just want to suck be fed and sleep?>implying everyone who has a foreskin would have phimosis>implications I never implied that actually. Do people get flu shots because EVERYONE will get the flu if they don't? Do people put on sunscreen because EVERYONE will get cancer if they don't? It's precausionaryAnd thus wrong to force upon someone.
If you weren't circumcised you should probably kill yourself
