No, you're making it sound like I'd have no objection if her admission was unconditional. The only difference is I wouldn't have been prompted to challenge her on it if it was.You seem to be of the view that we should commend people for having the "courage" (or something) to admit to their transgressions. And I don't agree if they're only doing it to make themselves feel more comfortable about them.
cmon guys we were like peas in a pod earlier
You could always alter your taste instead of straight up destroying it. It would be great if fats didn't taste good.
Quote from: Prime Quinx on August 18, 2015, 12:10:33 AMYou could always alter your taste instead of straight up destroying it. It would be great if fats didn't taste good.ah... i wonder how much research has been put into that
the point at which someone does admit to their transgressions is the point at which discussion should end.
There's no real need to "challenge" anyone, just because they failed to meet your stringent criteria for concessions.
You've always had this do-or-die mentality when it comes to the philosophy
I know from experience that "challenging" people is only going to cause them to become frustrated with you, and even less likely to cooperate with you. It's not great for the cause.
Jeez guy, I already said that I wasn't trying to justify my nature just because I was human. I'm flawed because being human is flawed, I can't really go anywhere else from there.
You've always had this do-or-die mentality when it comes to the philosophy, and I never liked that.
now you're just egging them on
Quote from: A Cheese Potato on August 18, 2015, 04:59:40 AMnow you're just egging them onI'm going to punch you
being in college and being relatively poor in a small ass hick town there aren't a lot of those options.
And yes, "muh canines" is a perfectly valid reason. Those teeth are specifically made to chew meat.
To those saying it doesn't require will power to not eat meat. Is it not our genetic programming to eat meat? And is it not hard to reject our genetic programming? Maybe that's ambiguous and differs from person to person. Hm maybe 'will power' is just the wrong term.
To those saying it doesn't require will power to not eat meat. Is it not our genetic programming to eat meat? And is it not hard to reject our genetic programming? Maybe that's ambiguous and differs from person to person. Hm maybe 'will power' is just the wrong term. A moral and ethical self discipline might be a better term?
Quote from: DAS WAIFUMEISTER x2 on August 18, 2015, 05:57:05 AMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 18, 2015, 05:30:00 AMTo those saying it doesn't require will power to not eat meat. Is it not our genetic programming to eat meat? And is it not hard to reject our genetic programming? Maybe that's ambiguous and differs from person to person. Hm maybe 'will power' is just the wrong term. A moral and ethical self discipline might be a better term?It's in my genes to fight the Romans and rape Slavic bitches.You don't see me doing that.Wait. You don't?
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 18, 2015, 05:30:00 AMTo those saying it doesn't require will power to not eat meat. Is it not our genetic programming to eat meat? And is it not hard to reject our genetic programming? Maybe that's ambiguous and differs from person to person. Hm maybe 'will power' is just the wrong term. A moral and ethical self discipline might be a better term?It's in my genes to fight the Romans and rape Slavic bitches.You don't see me doing that.
Quote from: True Turquoise on August 18, 2015, 05:03:05 AMQuote from: A Cheese Potato on August 18, 2015, 04:59:40 AMnow you're just egging them onI'm going to punch youno, please don't beet me
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 18, 2015, 05:30:00 AMTo those saying it doesn't require will power to not eat meat. Is it not our genetic programming to eat meat? And is it not hard to reject our genetic programming? Maybe that's ambiguous and differs from person to person. Hm maybe 'will power' is just the wrong term.The whole concept of "will power" seems redundant anyway. Saying it's easy to be a vegan is like saying it's easy to be a psychopath. . . Like, yeah it is for some people, just like it's easy to quit smoking for some people. Nobody has free will, and everything about you is predetermined. "Moral transgressions" only exist in an impersonal, non-responsible way wherein the person has some kind of no-fault deficiency which stops them from behaving as they "should".
I guess one noticed the ॐ in my name.
I like mine medium-well
Quote from: Rocketman287 on August 18, 2015, 10:22:27 AMI like mine medium-wellJust burn the thing, why don't ya?
Then what's the point of having a discussion in the first place?
Why should getting someone to admit their transgressions (while also admitting to no desire to change) be the goal of an interchange?
(Because to me that sounds like close to the worst outcome a discussion could have)
QuoteYou've always had this do-or-die mentality when it comes to the philosophyI have no idea what that means. Gonna need an example.
Is this a view you've only recently adopted?