Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:27:07 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:13:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshitQuantum connection = Irrational?eh I disagree with the notion that love isn't the 5th dimension or whatever. But I'll chalk that up to my spiritual belief.The Fifth Dimension is the next dimension after the 4th (Time).Which is likely something totally beyond comprehension.
Quote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:13:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshitQuantum connection = Irrational?eh I disagree with the notion that love isn't the 5th dimension or whatever. But I'll chalk that up to my spiritual belief.The Fifth Dimension is the next dimension after the 4th (Time).
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshitQuantum connection = Irrational?eh I disagree with the notion that love isn't the 5th dimension or whatever. But I'll chalk that up to my spiritual belief.
Quote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshit
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.
Quote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.
Quote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.
Quote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the day
Quote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.
Quote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watch
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.
2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.
Quote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:29:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:27:07 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:13:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshitQuantum connection = Irrational?eh I disagree with the notion that love isn't the 5th dimension or whatever. But I'll chalk that up to my spiritual belief.The Fifth Dimension is the next dimension after the 4th (Time).Which is likely something totally beyond comprehension.A fourth dimensional being sees all time at one moment, a fifth dimensional being sees all possible timelines at every possible moment.
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:31:26 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:29:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:27:07 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 05:13:20 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 05:05:15 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 05:02:16 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Azumarill on July 04, 2015, 04:45:28 PMQuote from: memecube han on July 04, 2015, 04:43:29 PMQuote from: Fruit on July 04, 2015, 03:58:56 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 03:47:19 PMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 04, 2015, 03:46:19 PM2001 is outdated, Interstellar is much better.I actually saw Interstellar about a week ago. Also fantastic.B-but it's not realistic!!!Naw, seriously though it was a fantastic movie, 2001 was pretty good too, but yeah it's kinda outdated nowstill something you gotta watchthe only thing really that bad aside from the ending(although I guess you could argue "muh godlike 5th dimensional entities") was the ice planet where the ice floats above gas or something. . .Someone failed deformable bodies.the last bit of insterstellar very nearly ruined the rest of the filmluckily it was good enough to still be a 7 at the end of the daythe only thing that really bothered me was the improbability of Murph noticing the watch message and the sappy "love is the fifth dimension" angle(although maybe that was just Hathaway's character being irrational).The rest of it including the tesseract and it's appearance can be handwaved with Clarke's 3rd law, which as a sci-fi fan I'm kind of used to.FOR FUCKS SAKE LOVE IS NOT THE FIFTH DIMENSION. The only part where "love" falls into play is the fact it was Cooper's love for his daughter that kept him going. There was no implication anywhere that love was the fifth dimension, that is asinine bullshit.Hathaway's character went on the love rant because she was desperate for love again, a connection with someone. Did you notice how in the scene before her rant she was watching a video message from her father? Her father wasn't giving any love or support, just lessons. Cold, emotionless, monotone. Like a professor to a student. Kinda loveless. She's in the middle of deep space in another galaxy, the furthest away from human population anyone has ever been and is, for the most part, alone. With that in perspective you can understand why she suddenly went on an irrational "love is the answer" rant because she was so desperate to see her lover again on the planet he was sent to.She literally said it and if you'll noticed I said it could've just been her being irrational. The sappiness still got on my nerves but that's a subjective appraisal.No shit she literally said it, because she's desperate. It doesn't mean it was the case. She was being irrational, I thought her crying her fucking eyes out would have made that obvious to anyone. Guess that's just me though.Though I never heard her say "love is the fifth dimension" at all. Just that it was a "quantum connection" or some IRRATIONAL bullshitQuantum connection = Irrational?eh I disagree with the notion that love isn't the 5th dimension or whatever. But I'll chalk that up to my spiritual belief.The Fifth Dimension is the next dimension after the 4th (Time).Which is likely something totally beyond comprehension.A fourth dimensional being sees all time at one moment, a fifth dimensional being sees all possible timelines at every possible moment.oh true. Like they showed when Cooper was accessing each moment individually. Although that was being shown in the 3D world so.
Seen Mad Max: Fury Road yet?
Kubrick sucks ass.Polanski > Lynch >>> Kubrick
Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on July 04, 2015, 08:13:58 PMSeen Mad Max: Fury Road yet?lol nope. But I can on the same site I watched 2001.
Quote from: SecondClass on July 04, 2015, 08:40:42 PMKubrick sucks ass.Polanski > Lynch >>> KubrickI disagree with you.
Quote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 08:39:30 PMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on July 04, 2015, 08:13:58 PMSeen Mad Max: Fury Road yet?lol nope. But I can on the same site I watched 2001.DO IT. It's awesome. Honestly it was one of those movies best experienced in the theater in my opinion, and seeing as it isn't out of theaters yet I'd take the opportunity to see it on the big screen. It's a very visually stunning film. How's the stream quality of the site you're using?
Quote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 08:41:58 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 04, 2015, 08:40:42 PMKubrick sucks ass.Polanski > Lynch >>> KubrickI disagree with you.HOW DARE YOUMY OPINION IS ALL
Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on July 04, 2015, 08:42:13 PMQuote from: TBlocks on July 04, 2015, 08:39:30 PMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on July 04, 2015, 08:13:58 PMSeen Mad Max: Fury Road yet?lol nope. But I can on the same site I watched 2001.DO IT. It's awesome. Honestly it was one of those movies best experienced in the theater in my opinion, and seeing as it isn't out of theaters yet I'd take the opportunity to see it on the big screen. It's a very visually stunning film. How's the stream quality of the site you're using?Really good actually http://niter.co/
The sequel is a space abortion
I just watched...
