Quote from: Mega Sceptile on February 26, 2015, 04:01:40 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass the calculations show that a reaper's hull can barely handle plasma without being rekt in 2 shots, let alone the hard light weapons the forerunners use.A single shot from a MAC that's not even at full capacity would obliterate a Reaper.
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass the calculations show that a reaper's hull can barely handle plasma without being rekt in 2 shots, let alone the hard light weapons the forerunners use.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi
Quote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easily
>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's Aproach
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:59:25 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 03:55:50 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>WeakdumbassThey're only powerful in the ME Universe because they wipe out any civilization that's advanced to a certain stage every 50,000 years.Compared to factions from the Halo Universe they're not very powerful, so yes, they're weak.Mass Effect is a very weak Sci-fi.Controlling and destroying an entire galaxy for millions of years is the exact opposite of weakYou're an idiotI never said they were weak.I said they're very weak in comparison.You're dumd
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 03:55:50 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>WeakdumbassThey're only powerful in the ME Universe because they wipe out any civilization that's advanced to a certain stage every 50,000 years.Compared to factions from the Halo Universe they're not very powerful, so yes, they're weak.Mass Effect is a very weak Sci-fi.Controlling and destroying an entire galaxy for millions of years is the exact opposite of weakYou're an idiot
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>WeakdumbassThey're only powerful in the ME Universe because they wipe out any civilization that's advanced to a certain stage every 50,000 years.Compared to factions from the Halo Universe they're not very powerful, so yes, they're weak.Mass Effect is a very weak Sci-fi.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:03:42 PMQuote from: Mega Sceptile on February 26, 2015, 04:01:40 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass the calculations show that a reaper's hull can barely handle plasma without being rekt in 2 shots, let alone the hard light weapons the forerunners use.A single shot from a MAC that's not even at full capacity would obliterate a Reaper.LOL no, reapers have kinetic barriers you idiot
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:05:06 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:03:42 PMQuote from: Mega Sceptile on February 26, 2015, 04:01:40 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass the calculations show that a reaper's hull can barely handle plasma without being rekt in 2 shots, let alone the hard light weapons the forerunners use.A single shot from a MAC that's not even at full capacity would obliterate a Reaper.LOL no, reapers have kinetic barriers you idiotA kinetic barrier isn't going to stop a force of 51 Gigatons.
And then the Star Wars universe comes in and obliterates both the Mass Effect and Halo universe with ease.
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:08:47 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:07:15 PMAnd then the Star Wars universe comes in and obliterates both the Mass Effect and Halo universe with ease.Except Star Wars is basically just fantasy and space magic, so nololnoThe Force would help them a lot, but I am not even including that. Purely based on their technology, Star Wars would destroy both the Mass Effect and Halo universes.
Quote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:07:15 PMAnd then the Star Wars universe comes in and obliterates both the Mass Effect and Halo universe with ease.Except Star Wars is basically just fantasy and space magic, so no
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:10:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:07:15 PMAnd then the Star Wars universe comes in and obliterates both the Mass Effect and Halo universe with ease.SW doesn't have a race that can create life or destroy life on a whimHalo does not have a race that can create life or destroy life on a whim. Star Wars is technologically superior in every way and has actual species that could take on the Precursors and Forerunners, assuming those two races would be able to actually withstand standard Star Wars weapon and shielding tech.
Quote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:07:15 PMAnd then the Star Wars universe comes in and obliterates both the Mass Effect and Halo universe with ease.SW doesn't have a race that can create life or destroy life on a whim
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:28:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.Hey there, Halo fanboy.You are literally talking out of your ass right now. Nothing predates the Universe, every species that exists starts somewhere, and comes from the Universe. Precursors are a stupid extinct species with ridiculously powerful technology based on Halo standards, since the Halo sci-fi universe is so weak.
Quote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:28:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.LOL now that I can safely say is bullshit, there was never any implication the Precursors predate the universe anywhere
Is that the same idiot that thinks goku can beat superman?
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:37:34 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:28:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.LOL now that I can safely say is bullshit, there was never any implication the Precursors predate the universe anywhereThey're over 100 billion years old. The age of the Universe isn't even a quarter of that.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:40:42 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:37:34 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:28:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.LOL now that I can safely say is bullshit, there was never any implication the Precursors predate the universe anywhereThey're over 100 billion years old. The age of the Universe isn't even a quarter of that.No they're not, a specific age has never been stated. Estimates were around 100 million years if anything, but certainly not something as crazy retarded as 100 billion years. If they were 100 billion years old they would have never been defeated by the Forerunners in the first place and would be all over the universe and still populating the Milky Way. Xeelee > Precursors, all day every day
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:36:51 PMHoly shit guys, I just can't stop talking out of my asshole. It won't shut up.
Holy shit guys, I just can't stop talking out of my asshole. It won't shut up.
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:42:42 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:40:42 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 04:37:34 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 04:28:22 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 04:16:31 PMSW has technology that surpasses Precursor's neural physics technology, and is virtually indestructible?Precursors themselves can simply not want to die.Precursors predate the Universe itself.Precursors are transient, and exist on a level beyond that of regular sapient beings.LOL now that I can safely say is bullshit, there was never any implication the Precursors predate the universe anywhereThey're over 100 billion years old. The age of the Universe isn't even a quarter of that.No they're not, a specific age has never been stated. Estimates were around 100 million years if anything, but certainly not something as crazy retarded as 100 billion years. If they were 100 billion years old they would have never been defeated by the Forerunners in the first place and would be all over the universe and still populating the Milky Way. Xeelee > Precursors, all day every day>Precursors created the Organon>The Organon contains around 100 billion years of information >They're transient beings that exist on a completely different level of existence >They travel Galaxies>They were "defeated" by the Forerunners because they allowed it>They would allow themselves to die and be evolved again and again >Hyper advanced >Can manipulate the Universe
I found B.Net's biggest retard
