He made a thread about "rustling jimmies" here too...........*sigh*
Quote from: Val 'Ketam on February 24, 2015, 11:22:56 AMHe made a thread about "rustling jimmies" here too...........*sigh*he did?
Quote from: EnderWolf1013 on February 24, 2015, 11:25:12 AMQuote from: Val 'Ketam on February 24, 2015, 11:22:56 AMHe made a thread about "rustling jimmies" here too...........*sigh*he did?Yes, yes he did
Quote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AMYou don't get dumber than this idiotI dunno. There are a lot of Halo fanboys who think that Halo could beat Star Wars just because of the stupid Precursors. Precursors who have their abilities exaggerated by those fanboys and think they are invincible.
You don't get dumber than this idiot
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 01:02:46 PMQuote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 12:59:22 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AMYou don't get dumber than this idiotI dunno. There are a lot of Halo fanboys who think that Halo could beat Star Wars just because of the stupid Precursors. Precursors who have their abilities exaggerated by those fanboys and think they are invincible.Nothing about Halo in that thread was exaggerated.I id not even read the thread linked in the OP. I am talking about the numerous threads over the years on The Flood about "Halo vs Star Wars", in which Halo loses every single time but Halo fanboys refuse to accept it and keep spewing bullshit.
Quote from: Noëlle on February 26, 2015, 12:59:22 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AMYou don't get dumber than this idiotI dunno. There are a lot of Halo fanboys who think that Halo could beat Star Wars just because of the stupid Precursors. Precursors who have their abilities exaggerated by those fanboys and think they are invincible.Nothing about Halo in that thread was exaggerated.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 01:09:05 PMThe same can be said about the Star Wars side of the argument, but whatever.Nope.
The same can be said about the Star Wars side of the argument, but whatever.
>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's Aproach
Quote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easily
I'm not taking sides here but...SpoilerFUCK THE YUUZHAN VONG
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>WeakdumbassThey're only powerful in the ME Universe because they wipe out any civilization that's advanced to a certain stage every 50,000 years.Compared to factions from the Halo Universe they're not very powerful, so yes, they're weak.Mass Effect is a very weak Sci-fi.
Quote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 03:55:50 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>WeakdumbassThey're only powerful in the ME Universe because they wipe out any civilization that's advanced to a certain stage every 50,000 years.Compared to factions from the Halo Universe they're not very powerful, so yes, they're weak.Mass Effect is a very weak Sci-fi.Controlling and destroying an entire galaxy for millions of years is the exact opposite of weakYou're an idiot
Quote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 03:51:08 PMQuote from: Lemön | Britainistanian on February 26, 2015, 02:56:51 PMQuote from: aTALLmidget on February 26, 2015, 02:06:34 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon™ on February 24, 2015, 08:07:34 AM>Thinks a Reaper could destroy Mantle's AproachBut it could, easilyThis is tempting baitMass Effect is a weak Sci-fi>Reapers destroy galactic civilization every 50,000 years for millions of years>Weakdumbass the calculations show that a reaper's hull can barely handle plasma without being rekt in 2 shots, let alone the hard light weapons the forerunners use.