What if I told you that when I say, "intoxication is bad," I'm not making an argument from morality?
If I found a philosophy that works, very well, why would I not advocate it?
Why does that make it a shitty philosophy? If anything, doesn't it just mean that I'm passionate?
Why? I think I have the right to disdain... literally anything or anyone I want.
Does it hurt you?
Probably? In what type of circumstances would one not be considered a shitty person by you?
Could you give an example? I want to learn how to judge people's personal, private business the correct way.
I mean, that's just not at all the correct use of the term "probably"--the way you use it implies that there are ways for you to judge people without being a shitty person. You would be correct in making that concession, but if that's not what you were saying, then you shouldn't have said that.So...Did you know that there are correct ways to judge people?
Judging people doesn't really affect anyone negatively, does it? And yet, it's still idiotic? Why can't I apply the same standard, then, to smoking pot?Smoking pot makes you happy, judging people makes me happy. They don't negatively affect anyone.
Then smoking pot is a social problem.How do you know I'm a social reject?
Why is "disdaining your fellow humans" a problem if humans are so disdain-able? You may not find them disdain-able, but I do.
It's not that humans aren't "disdain-able", it's that the act of smoking weed isn't. Disdain and judge away if someone's actually doing something wrong.
18.
Quote from: SecondClass on January 19, 2015, 04:55:43 PMIt's not that humans aren't "disdain-able", it's that the act of smoking weed isn't. Disdain and judge away if someone's actually doing something wrong.You don't think there's something wrong if people start using substances to substitute having a social life (and I'm the social reject?)?