Is this supposed to be a counter argument?
Being against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls
Quote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?
cut this trash and post your private gallery
Quote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.
Quote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.
Quote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.
Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
Quote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:21:48 AMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.Well now you're just arguing semantics.
<Quote from: DASIUS B00TICUS SNAKESAR on March 01, 2015, 10:24:17 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 10:23:50 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:21:48 AMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.Well now you're just arguing semantics.Semantics are important.
Quote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 10:23:50 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:21:48 AMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.Well now you're just arguing semantics.Semantics are important.
Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:23:20 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:21:48 AMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.Here's a better word for it: immoral.Synonyms: The Thread
Quote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:21:48 AMQuote from: Mmmmm Napalm on March 01, 2015, 10:18:41 AMQuote from: Kupo on March 01, 2015, 10:06:39 AMQuote from: challengerX on March 01, 2015, 03:54:10 AMQuote from: Kupo on February 28, 2015, 07:23:35 PMQuote from: challengerX on February 28, 2015, 07:17:18 PMIs this supposed to be a counter argument?I doubt you're being serious >.>Quote from: Mmmmm Napalm on February 28, 2015, 07:18:21 PMBeing against the degradation of women=/=being an SJWKupo pls<.<Well while we've changed the subject, if it's degrading for both genders, or if they're doing it on their own accord, is it really degrading at all?Of course I'm being serious. I'd disown my daughter if she was such a whore.It's degrading. It doesn't matter whether it's willful or forced.Like I said in a previous post, it's only 'dishonorable' because people like you make it so. You haven't actually refuted that yet.I've still yet to see how it's 'unethical' though, like what Napalm claimed. He doesn't seem to be able to defend himself, which is why I thought you were trolling.It's not that I'm unable to defend myself, it's that I'm tired of this debate.I absolve myself of this matter.>.>I can understand how some would see it dishonorable, but unethical just seems like a bit of a stretch to me.Here's a better word for it: immoral.
I find that unethical and immoral are often used in different contexts, I feel immoral fits this context better.
Such attitudes simply enable unethical behavior, allowing it to spread, and ironically, affect others.
I'm 99% sure I found a picture of a girl I know on /r/gonewild
