How many people on this forum think it's trolling to be for age of consent laws?

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This has to be one of the poorest attempts at trolling ever. You must be desperate, Dustbin.

Okay this is just getting annoying. If I'm trolling, and yeah I admit I do it time to time, I will indicate it at the end or in some way let them know. And for the past week all you've done is call me a troll. And for what now? Being offended that pedophilia is acceptable here? Yeah nice try.

Lol

Go fuck yourself. Or tempt to leave earlier before I even get to view the results here, I don't care.

Lol

Cool. I'll make sure to not back down on my threat to tip off the FBI when I leave this shithole.

>implying they'd do anything about it

Are you not being sarcastic?

. . .

NO.

What in the name of all that is fucking right and proper made you think, of all the cunting fucking things to think, that I somehow think children are responsible enough to engage in fucking relationships?

Personally idgaf.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Cool. I'll make sure to not back down on my threat to tip off the FBI when I leave this shithole.

LOL. You just made my morning, Dustin. This thread is gold.

If she 16 i'm 16 nomsayin

not serious though to the guy who's reporting this to the fbi ^

I have no idea what Dustin is doing, so I'm just going to leave while I still have my sanity.

Did you not realize I was being sarcastic?

I did.

You were implying that was the consequence of Verbatim's logic.

Which I, in turn, called absolutely fucking retarded.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

That's utterly a non-sequitur.

First of all, kid=/=15 year old. Paedophilia is only paedophilia with somebody pre-pubescent, which is usually classed as somebody 13 or under.

Second of all, 15 year olds are, to a degree, responsible. They, mostly, understand the nature of social media and the internet. Should they be criminally liable for distributing such pictures? No, but they bear a moral responsibility for it. Like walking through Detroit at midnight shining a torch on the fat wad of 50s in your hand.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Teenagers are almost less responsible considering the amount of emotional distress they (we) go through.

Bull. Shit.

I've seen you say, on at least one occasion, that depression, one of the greatest emotional distresses a person can endure, isn't a big deal.

We don't give people aged 15 mortgages or the legal capacity to consume alcohol, with good reason. But there are a number of responsibilities that they're also close to, including driving a car and, in some places, voting.

15-year-olds know that taking a naked picture has its risks. The sense of immediacy diminishes the ability to perform a cost-benefit analysis in everybody, not just teens, but it's just bollocks to imply it somehow reduces responsibility.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

In any sense, I'm sure you wouldn't say that those pictures should circulate, legally, as a punishment for their irresponsibility.

No, for the same reason it'd be illegal for somebody to circulate a manuscript for a new Harry Potter novel.

It isn't their property.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

And assuming that wasn't an issue for you, you would be okay with it?

What?

If we assume it isn't an issue with me, then surely the conclusion would be that I'm okay with it.

it's 16 over here, but honestly i think it should be 14.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Yeah, you're fucking sick.

No, dude, I don't know what the fuck you mean.

I don't know what you mean by "if that weren't an issue for me". You're essentially saying "If we remove what's wrong with an action from the equation, is the action okay?"

The answer is necessarily yes.

*waves*
Bye, no one will miss you.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

That's entirely besides the point. You literally just told me that you're okay with nude pictures of kids circulating the internet if they gave it their consent even though kids cannot give consent like that because they do not understand the larger implication that doing things like that ruins lives.

Kids can't give consent, therefore they cannot properly be in possession of property.

We're still discussing the case of somebody 15-years-old, which isn't so black-and-white.

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.