Total Members Voted: 42
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.
No one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:34:00 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.Because I don't need to.It's simple logic.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:35:18 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:34:00 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.Because I don't need to.It's simple logic.Because you can't.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:39:59 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:35:18 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:34:00 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.Because I don't need to.It's simple logic.Because you can't.Sorry, let me use logic again.>less than 10% bf>Does nothing for you>In a survival situation, your body will eat almost exclusively you muscle>Losing muscle in a survival situation is damning>Thus we can conclude that low bf% does not help in any way and can actually hurt you
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:42:22 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:39:59 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:35:18 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:34:00 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.Because I don't need to.It's simple logic.Because you can't.Sorry, let me use logic again.>less than 10% bf>Does nothing for you>In a survival situation, your body will eat almost exclusively you muscle>Losing muscle in a survival situation is damning>Thus we can conclude that low bf% does not help in any way and can actually hurt youThere you go changing the subject again. You still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable.
check the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%even though jeff and crew act like full on homos
Quote from: Jive Turkey on February 07, 2015, 02:55:31 PMcheck the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%even though jeff and crew act like full on homosWhat the fuck is with the guy on the right's waist?
Quote from: Yu on February 07, 2015, 06:00:32 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 07, 2015, 02:55:31 PMcheck the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%even though jeff and crew act like full on homosWhat the fuck is with the guy on the right's waist?No bodyfat.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 06:01:23 PMQuote from: Yu on February 07, 2015, 06:00:32 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 07, 2015, 02:55:31 PMcheck the easy access to sloot poosay when under 12%even though jeff and crew act like full on homosWhat the fuck is with the guy on the right's waist?No bodyfat.That just looks horrible.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:51:48 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:42:22 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:39:59 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:35:18 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:34:00 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:31:12 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 05:09:56 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 04:00:07 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 02:22:30 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 02:11:29 PMNo one is healthy starving you fucking dolt. Health isn't measured on how long you can starve. Health is defined as being free from illness or injury. Doctors don't do check ups to see how long you can survive without eating. I do not know why you are basing health on the potential of losing muscle in a random scenario.You said it was unhealthy to maintain a low bf%. I said with proper nutrients and exercise, it was. I was never debating whether starving someone was healthy or not.Now, do you or do you not have any studies or backed up evidence that with proper nutrients (not starving) and exercise, 6-9% bf is unsustainable?There is no purpose to have anything lower than 12% bf in any situation, you're only adding extra risk to yourself. Making it an unhealthy choice.Quit changing the subject. We're not arguing purpose, we're discussing sustainability in a controlled enviroment. Still waiting for one credibile study.You don't need a credible study to realize that you're a fucking idiot to have less than 12% body fat.How's it stupid, because you don't want it or can't get it? You haven't been able to prove it's unhealthy besides pointlessly repeating yourself, so it just sounds like you're trying to rationalize your inability/inferiority.It's amazing how butthurt you are at the fact that I'm pointing out that having extremely low bf% is vain and dangerous is many situations.Not butthurt, simply pointing out you still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable. Not extremely low like below 5%, but 6-9%.Because I don't need to.It's simple logic.Because you can't.Sorry, let me use logic again.>less than 10% bf>Does nothing for you>In a survival situation, your body will eat almost exclusively you muscle>Losing muscle in a survival situation is damning>Thus we can conclude that low bf% does not help in any way and can actually hurt youThere you go changing the subject again. You still haven't been able to provide one source supporting the claim 6-9%bf is unsustainable.I never changed the subject you ponce.This has been my argument from the fucking beginning.It's retarded to have single digit bf because you're only adding risk to yourself.I'm sorry you're too dense to understand that.
You said it was unsustainable, which I asked for a source. You still refuse and you're trying say you only thought it was stupid.You only think it's a risk because of some random ass chance the person will be throw into some survival mode scenario. How many people in America randomly getting abducted and throw in the wilderness or in-prisoned without food? Most don't. Do you live in some state of perpetuating fear?
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 06:06:39 PMYou said it was unsustainable, which I asked for a source. You still refuse and you're trying say you only thought it was stupid.You only think it's a risk because of some random ass chance the person will be throw into some survival mode scenario. How many people in America randomly getting abducted and throw in the wilderness or in-prisoned without food? Most don't. Do you live in some state of perpetuating fear?Quote me.Do you live in some state of mind where you think that doing something for no good reason, and only adding risk to yourself is okay?The reason most people actually want muscle and work out is for it's original purpose in evolution, to help keep you alive. The moment you take it too far and actually hurt your chances for survival is when you're officially an idiot.
He thinks single digit bodyfat% is healthy.It's obvious he's a retard.
Below 5 percent may be, but show me evidence that with proper exercise and nutritition a BF% between 6-9% is unhealthy. I'll be waiting.
Simple enough. In any emergency situation where you can't get enough nutrition you're going to be losing mass like a motherfucker.In this case it's going to be your muscles instead of bf.
You didn't explicitly use the word sustainable, but your whole argument revolves around on the possibility the person will be put in situation they starve to lose muscle, which is unreasonable.Everything you do in life has a risk. With proper nutrient intake and exercise there is little to no risk. Pretty sure body builders are far more likely to survive than you. They are stronger, have higher endurance, and higher sex appeal than you. Body building is more than physical too. They are mentally stronger as well.
You didn't explicitly use the word sustainable, but your whole argument revolves around on the possibility the person will be put in situation they starve to lose muscle, which is unreasonable.
With proper nutrient intake and exercise there is little to no risk. Pretty sure body builders are far more likely to survive than you. They are stronger, have higher endurance, and higher sex appeal than you. Body building is more than physical too. They are mentally stronger as well.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 06:50:19 PMYou didn't explicitly use the word sustainable, but your whole argument revolves around on the possibility the person will be put in situation they starve to lose muscle, which is unreasonable.How is that unreasonable? Literally the reason anyone with a brain wants to gain muscle in the first place is to perform in difficult situations.
Most of these situations require you to expend energy, energy comes from body mass. When the majority of your expendable body mass is muscle you're going to lose muscle.
If you're just getting muscles to show you have them, you're an idiot. Full stop.
But when the nutrients go away you're risking everything.
>Higher endurancehttp://www.lifefitness.com/blog/posts/muscle-strength-vs-muscle-endurance.html
>Higher sex appealhttp://www.askmen.com/dating/heidi_600/617_what-women-think-about-bodybuilders.html
>Mentally strongerNot even close. Put a body builder into ranger training.They'll want out so fucking fast you wouldn't even believe.
Also,http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/10404822/Is-body-building-bad-for-soldiers-health.htmlBody building is bad for anyone who actually needs to survive.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:21:40 PMlmaoyou're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:21:40 PMlmaoyou're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.Looks like your attempt at trolling failed and now you gotta resort to calling me being a troll. Better luck next time Skippy, and check your sources :^)
I got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMI got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.FTFY
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:24:43 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:21:40 PMlmaoyou're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.Looks like your attempt at trolling failed and now you gotta resort to calling me being a troll. Better luck next time Skippy, and check your sources :^)>Being this butthurt because I realized you were trollinglmao
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:25:32 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:24:43 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 07, 2015, 08:21:40 PMlmaoyou're either trolling or hopelessly disillusioned.Looks like your attempt at trolling failed and now you gotta resort to calling me being a troll. Better luck next time Skippy, and check your sources :^)>Being this butthurt because I realized you were trollinglmao>He doesn't check his sources
Quote from: Mega Sceptile on February 07, 2015, 08:28:54 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMI got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.FTFYAlso butthurt.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:29:30 PMQuote from: Mega Sceptile on February 07, 2015, 08:28:54 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMI got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.FTFYAlso butthurt. ^ all that damage control because you were proven wrong. you're a joke dude.
Quote from: The Waifu God on February 06, 2015, 07:55:00 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on February 06, 2015, 07:31:18 PMQuote from: ⱭAS ᗺ00T x2 on February 06, 2015, 05:36:28 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:29:34 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 06, 2015, 05:19:29 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'Yeah it is cuzzzheart rate is lower than most peopleBig lung capacityLess fat than most peopleMuscles have power to push/pull hundreds of pounds multiple times Denser bonesGets more and better nutrients than 99% of people(through diet/supplements/vitamins)Plus he's fookin aestheticcccbut staying at bodybuilder contest levels of (nearly nonexistent) body fat for extended periods of time is bad.Only really low levels (less than 3-5% I believe).4% is right around where that guy is.No he's not, but he's definitely single digits.I just noticed kinder offered his pic^^^
Quote from: Sly Instinct on February 06, 2015, 07:31:18 PMQuote from: ⱭAS ᗺ00T x2 on February 06, 2015, 05:36:28 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:29:34 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 06, 2015, 05:19:29 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'Yeah it is cuzzzheart rate is lower than most peopleBig lung capacityLess fat than most peopleMuscles have power to push/pull hundreds of pounds multiple times Denser bonesGets more and better nutrients than 99% of people(through diet/supplements/vitamins)Plus he's fookin aestheticcccbut staying at bodybuilder contest levels of (nearly nonexistent) body fat for extended periods of time is bad.Only really low levels (less than 3-5% I believe).4% is right around where that guy is.
Quote from: ⱭAS ᗺ00T x2 on February 06, 2015, 05:36:28 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:29:34 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 06, 2015, 05:19:29 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'Yeah it is cuzzzheart rate is lower than most peopleBig lung capacityLess fat than most peopleMuscles have power to push/pull hundreds of pounds multiple times Denser bonesGets more and better nutrients than 99% of people(through diet/supplements/vitamins)Plus he's fookin aestheticcccbut staying at bodybuilder contest levels of (nearly nonexistent) body fat for extended periods of time is bad.Only really low levels (less than 3-5% I believe).
Quote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:29:34 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on February 06, 2015, 05:19:29 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'Yeah it is cuzzzheart rate is lower than most peopleBig lung capacityLess fat than most peopleMuscles have power to push/pull hundreds of pounds multiple times Denser bonesGets more and better nutrients than 99% of people(through diet/supplements/vitamins)Plus he's fookin aestheticcccbut staying at bodybuilder contest levels of (nearly nonexistent) body fat for extended periods of time is bad.
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 06, 2015, 05:19:29 PMQuote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'Yeah it is cuzzzheart rate is lower than most peopleBig lung capacityLess fat than most peopleMuscles have power to push/pull hundreds of pounds multiple times Denser bonesGets more and better nutrients than 99% of people(through diet/supplements/vitamins)Plus he's fookin aestheticccc
Quote from: Jive Turkey on February 06, 2015, 05:17:00 PMSpoilerThat shit isn't healthy yo'
Spoiler
Quote from: Mega Sceptile on February 07, 2015, 08:30:58 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:29:30 PMQuote from: Mega Sceptile on February 07, 2015, 08:28:54 PMQuote from: The Waifu God on February 07, 2015, 08:23:09 PMI got rekt, SO I'm resorting to calling people names because that totally proves I'm smarter. Even though my argument has been split in two and my point is pretty much invalid, I still think I won the argument.FTFYAlso butthurt. ^ all that damage control because you were proven wrong. you're a joke dude.All this butthurt because you're a poser
Poll
How many on you fuckers actually exercise?