Technically everything we do is in the past
Everything we do is in the past... or at least, will be.
This thread is in the past.
Quote from: True Velox on January 19, 2015, 06:05:23 AMEverything we do is in the past... or at least, will be.But not yet.
Quote from: Nagato on January 19, 2015, 06:06:29 AMThis thread is in the past.you're mom is in the past
Quote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:08:31 AMQuote from: True Velox on January 19, 2015, 06:05:23 AMEverything we do is in the past... or at least, will be.But not yet.You're assuming we are stationary and that time is flowing. What if time is static, and we're moving through it? That way, everything is in the past, present, and future at the same time, but since we can only see the timeline one moment at a time we don't notice it.
Assuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:17:08 AMAssuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.That doesn't mean that it exists in the past.
Quote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:20:06 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:17:08 AMAssuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.That doesn't mean that it exists in the past.correct it mess it existed in the past and may or may not exist at the exact moment of the "present".
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:21:26 AMQuote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:20:06 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:17:08 AMAssuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.That doesn't mean that it exists in the past.correct it mess it existed in the past and may or may not exist at the exact moment of the "present".experience gives us to believe that objects that we continuously experience are continuousUhm, try this if you have 5 minutesSpoilerYouTube
Quote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:40:35 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:21:26 AMQuote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:20:06 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:17:08 AMAssuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.That doesn't mean that it exists in the past.correct it mess it existed in the past and may or may not exist at the exact moment of the "present".experience gives us to believe that objects that we continuously experience are continuousUhm, try this if you have 5 minutesSpoilerYouTubeCan't say I care too much for Kant.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:47:48 AMQuote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:40:35 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:21:26 AMQuote from: Elegiac on January 19, 2015, 06:20:06 AMQuote from: DAS B00T x2 on January 19, 2015, 06:17:08 AMAssuming a fractional delay in time from an objects origin to it's reaching of our senses, everything we see is in the past.That doesn't mean that it exists in the past.correct it mess it existed in the past and may or may not exist at the exact moment of the "present".experience gives us to believe that objects that we continuously experience are continuousUhm, try this if you have 5 minutesSpoilerYouTubeCan't say I care too much for Kant.Your doubting objects just reminded me of it. I don't take too much from any one philosopher, kant included.
/meta bait
Septy is luv
Quote from: True Turquoise on January 19, 2015, 08:59:46 AMSepty is luv
Quote from: SecondClass on January 19, 2015, 06:10:03 AMQuote from: Nagato on January 19, 2015, 06:06:29 AMThis thread is in the past.you're mom is in the past*your BITCH
Despite what Septy thinks.
