Poll

The Community Decides

Yes
17 (68%)
No
8 (32%)

Total Members Voted: 25

Should I Ban SecondClass?

 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.


Batch | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Sips
PSN: Fucking
Steam: Tea
ID: Batch
IP: Logged

8,127 posts
 
Eating animals is a need.

And I don't want to argue whether or not eating animals is indeed morally wrong.
Its not, its about survival.

Think a lion gives a fuck we it tears into your flesh carcass. I'd much rather eat animals then all this processed shit that gets thrown at us nowadays.
Nice appeal to nature. Not talking to Ganon about this (I know he doesn't want to talk about animals) but eating animals IS morally wrong, considering that you can eat other kinds of foods. There's no reason that a rabbit has to die when you can eat nuts for protein instead.

That being said, I'm not a vegan or a vegetarian. I eat animals and recognize it's evil for me to do so.
Why is it morally wrong for us and not a fox? Maybe we dont have access to those alternatives, maybe some of us cant eat them?

Is it still morally wrong to only kill under certain circumstances?

If you slaughter an animal for sports,  that is wrong.  If you use it remains to survive,  I dont see anything wrong with  that. Just because we can make the choice doesn't mean we always can, and if we were bound to those morals, all of us, then a lot of us would surely be dead. Do you think we should put our morals in front of our survival?  Thats ridiculous.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
Class, don't respond to him. He's heard the answer to this question at least a million times.


Batch | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Sips
PSN: Fucking
Steam: Tea
ID: Batch
IP: Logged

8,127 posts
 

I just fucking said I have no use for this argument. If you want to start another thread for it, by all means. But that is not what this thread is for. As it stands, we're derailing it enough.

Jesus fucking Christ.
I misinterpreted,  apologies .


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.
Holding an opinion is freedom of opinion. Letting others know that you hold that opinion is freedom of expression. Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway. Whereas freedom of expression wouldn't, since you've already expressed that you hold the opinion.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,623 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
Walking into a crowded theater and yelling fire would be free speech
You do not have a right to incite panics or riots for malicious purposes.


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
Walking into a crowded theater and yelling fire would be free speech
You do not have a right to incite panics or riots for malicious purposes.
Did you skim over the rest of that post? The very first line was "I don't believe in freedom of speech"


Batch | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Sips
PSN: Fucking
Steam: Tea
ID: Batch
IP: Logged

8,127 posts
 
I think everyone should be free to say what they want, that shouldnt protect them from the result of their actions and they should expect those repercussions .


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
I think everyone should be free to say what they want, that shouldnt protect them from the result of their actions and they should expect those repercussions .
Lol, that's just called free will. You could say the same thing about literally anything.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,623 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.
Holding an opinion is freedom of opinion. Letting others know that you hold that opinion is freedom of expression. Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway. Whereas freedom of expression wouldn't, since you've already expressed that you hold the opinion.
That's really not how the law is broken down.


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.
Holding an opinion is freedom of opinion. Letting others know that you hold that opinion is freedom of expression. Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway. Whereas freedom of expression wouldn't, since you've already expressed that you hold the opinion.
That's really not how the law is broken down.
We're not talking about laws.


Batch | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Sips
PSN: Fucking
Steam: Tea
ID: Batch
IP: Logged

8,127 posts
 
I think everyone should be free to say what they want, that shouldnt protect them from the result of their actions and they should expect those repercussions .
Lol, that's just called free will. You could say the same thing about literally anything.
So whats the difference?  Just because you shouldn't  say 'drop the TV Nigga Cheese' doesnt mean you can't.  Just expect to get dropped.

I effectively interpret that as free speech, but well that doesnt protect you. Its a messy thing in this age of Entitlement.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,623 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.
Holding an opinion is freedom of opinion. Letting others know that you hold that opinion is freedom of expression. Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway. Whereas freedom of expression wouldn't, since you've already expressed that you hold the opinion.
That's really not how the law is broken down.
We're not talking about laws.
That's still not how it works.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway.

I'm not sure about the U.S., but in Canada, we have something called the "Reasonable Limits Clause" embedded in our constitution. For harassment specifically, it is defined as "any act that is known or reasonable ought to be know to be unwanted." Anything that defies that clause could be viable for legal prosecution, including freedom of speech.

Does the U.S. have something like that? Because if it doesn't, and freedom of speech is an unalienable right, then it is clear that some unalienable rights can be immoral when exercised.

But since you don't believe in freedom of speech, hit me with some of your other "unalienable rights". Though I hope you understand how much I'm pandering to your arbitrary definition of "unalienable".



 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
I don't believe in freedom of speech, I believe in freedom of expression and opinion.

What if it was my opinion that my daughter was a whore? And I expressed that to her everyday?

If you could clarify on the difference between speech and expression, that would help, too.
Holding an opinion is freedom of opinion. Letting others know that you hold that opinion is freedom of expression. Once others are aware that you hold that opinion, and make it known that they don't want you to continue to harass them with it, freedom of speech would allow you to do so anyway. Whereas freedom of expression wouldn't, since you've already expressed that you hold the opinion.
That's really not how the law is broken down.
We're not talking about laws.
That's still not how it works.
Who the hell made you the end-all authority on human rights? They're debatable, that's the point.

@Ganon: The US has nothing like that, but that doesn't matter. Human rights aren't decided by governments, they're mulled upon by philosophers. Their very nature leads to debate and speculation.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
Human rights aren't decided by governments, they're mulled upon by philosophers. Their very nature leads to debate and speculation.

So aside from freedom of expression and opinion, what are some other unalienable rights?


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
Human rights aren't decided by governments, they're mulled upon by philosophers. Their very nature leads to debate and speculation.

So aside from freedom of expression and opinion, what are some other unalienable rights?
Right to self-harm/suicide, right to consume whatever you want, right to procreate, and right to food/water all come to mind.


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,623 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
@Ganon: The US has nothing like that
Yes we do. It's not in the amendment but codified within our common law system.


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
I will do whatever the community wants.
All right, it's 3 no 6 yes

are you going to ban me or be a pussy

I need a larger number than that
ok larger number achieved

your move Mike


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
right to consume whatever you want, right to procreate,

1. By "consume whatever you want", I assume you mean drugs and other substances? Because I'd say that snorting coke or injecting heroin into your body when a child that you're responsible for is present is easily immoral. And if you don't mean just substances, but food as well, it is immoral to eat animals.

2. Procreation is also immoral.

Okay, awesome. Now I have 2, maybe 3 solid arguments for unalienable rights that when exercised could be considered immoral.
Last Edit: December 22, 2015, 10:02:01 PM by Ganon


 
SecondClass
| Carmen
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,007 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
—Judge Aaron Satie
——Carmen
right to consume whatever you want, right to procreate,

1. By "consume whatever you want", I assume you mean drugs and other substances? Because I'd say that snorting coke or injecting heroin into your body when a child that you're responsible for is present is easily immoral. And if you don't mean just substances, but food as well, it is also immoral to eat animals.

2. Procreation is also immoral.

Okay, awesome. Now I have 2, maybe 3 solid arguments for unalienable rights that when exercised could be considered immoral.
1. I disagree. It's not immoral to do drugs unless you're affecting others. And eating animals isn't immoral, killing them is.

2. No it's not.

Anyway, I hope you didn't miss the point that unalienable rights are debated and speculated upon by thousands of people daily. There are no solid, concrete "unalienable rights", because people disagree on what those entail. I simply told you the concept and gave you MY opinion on which acts are human rights.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
1. I disagree. It's not immoral to do drugs unless you're affecting others.

Would you not agree that doing top-tier drugs while responsible for a child is "affect others"? I sure as hell would.

Quote
And eating animals isn't immoral, killing them is.

Sure, if you want to be pedantic about it.

Quote
2. No it's not.

I don't want an anti-natalist argument here either, but it's good to know that I can use this as justification in a later debate.

Quote
Anyway, I hope you didn't miss the point that unalienable rights are debated and speculated upon by thousands of people daily. There are no solid, concrete "unalienable rights", because people disagree on what those entail. I simply told you the concept and gave you MY opinion on which acts are human rights.

Ah, I see. That makes sense. The very concept of a human right is incapable of being immoral. Gotcha.

You haven't really changed my mind regarding suicide, though. I still think people should have the legal right to kill themselves, we should just focus on convincing them not to. Same with drugs and alcohol.


 
Alternative Facts
| Mythic Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: IcyWind
IP: Logged

9,381 posts
 
How the fuck did this thread turn into a human rights thread


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
How the fuck did this thread turn into a human rights thread

SecondClass tried to trigger me by saying "Suicide is a human right", but it backfired because I already considered it a human right. I just also considered it immoral.

He tried to explain to me the very concept of "unalienable right", and that's what we've been talking about the last 2 pages.