Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.
Quote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.
Quote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.
Quote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:08:27 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.You're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.I know exactly what I meant when I said that, and it was exactly as I explained. You can believe otherwise but the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me.
Quote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:29:55 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:08:27 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.You're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.I know exactly what I meant when I said that, and it was exactly as I explained. You can believe otherwise but the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me."the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me." ironic
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:30:41 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:29:55 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:08:27 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.You're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.I know exactly what I meant when I said that, and it was exactly as I explained. You can believe otherwise but the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me."the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me." ironicDon't you think it's arrogant to assume you understand someone better than they understand themselves? Especially someone you've hardly interacted with at all? I thought you valued humility.
Quote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:33:20 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:30:41 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:29:55 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 06:08:27 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 06:03:29 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:44:24 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 05:40:25 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 05:35:47 PMQuote from: Aether on December 01, 2016, 04:55:06 PMSure, you can believe whatever you want. Regardless,Facts>feelings.Okay, you better not be religious, because if you were then this would be hugely hypocritical. Which wouldn't be surprising, because you wouldn't be the first religious person to say something hypocritical of an atheist.I'm not atheist but I don't follow any Abrahamic religions nor am I a very religious person in general.Okay, then it's still hypocritical. If you believe in things which can't be supported by evidence then that's listening to your feelings over facts.I'm not talking about faith at all. I'm talking about emotions.As in, someone being offended isn't grounds to ignore truth.Okay, that's a pretty stupid definition. I think you actually meant something else when you said facts>feelings, and feelings don't only apply to "being offended", there's plenty of people who "feel in their heart that god exists" or "feel a presence of a ghost" or whatever. That's what you mean, and you can't just become a contortionist of meaning to try to escape the hole you dug yourself into here.You're reading into this far too much. It's just an expression that's been going around lately as a response to censorship and close mindedness. I haven't dug myself into any hole, although it appears that you're attempting to dig one for me.I know exactly what I meant when I said that, and it was exactly as I explained. You can believe otherwise but the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me."the truth is still the truth and that's all that matters to me." ironicDon't you think it's arrogant to assume you understand someone better than they understand themselves? Especially someone you've hardly interacted with at all? I thought you valued humility.Yeah, when what they say contradicts itself and doesn't add up.
Quote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:28:08 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:26:40 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:26:09 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:21:25 PMSo I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.Must feel bad knowing everyone thinks you're not above holding such shit opinions.More like it makes me feel bad for you.Why would I feel bad that people think you're retarded?I don't know, why would you?Loaf said that he feels bad for those who didn't understand the OP, because that means they're retards. He didn't say the latter part; I think so.
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:26:40 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:26:09 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:21:25 PMSo I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.Must feel bad knowing everyone thinks you're not above holding such shit opinions.More like it makes me feel bad for you.Why would I feel bad that people think you're retarded?
Quote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:26:09 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:21:25 PMSo I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.Must feel bad knowing everyone thinks you're not above holding such shit opinions.More like it makes me feel bad for you.
Quote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:21:25 PMSo I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.Must feel bad knowing everyone thinks you're not above holding such shit opinions.
So I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.
Quote from: Desty on December 01, 2016, 04:23:50 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:28:08 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:26:40 PMQuote from: Dietrich Six on December 01, 2016, 12:26:09 PMQuote from: Loaf on December 01, 2016, 12:21:25 PMSo I'm gonna break it to you, this thread was to show you that there's no difference in believing in god than denying the holocaust, or global warming, or the moon landing. They're all ridiculous beliefs that people hold that they simply because they choose to.Must feel bad knowing everyone thinks you're not above holding such shit opinions.More like it makes me feel bad for you.Why would I feel bad that people think you're retarded?I don't know, why would you?Loaf said that he feels bad for those who didn't understand the OP, because that means they're retards. He didn't say the latter part; I think so.People didn't second guess that he actually holds these beliefs, because he's a huge faggot.That was my point.
Can someone prove to me that cancer is real?
