I've only seen the first two, but id choose number 2 anyway.
2 is objectively the best.
Shrek 1 was fantastic and the rest were all horrible cash grabs. Pretty absurd you guys prefer 2. It expands the lore and that's about it. Nothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.That damn fight scene in 1 is fantastic.
Quote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMShrek 1 was fantastic and the rest were all horrible cash grabs. Pretty absurd you guys prefer 2. It expands the lore and that's about it. Nothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.That damn fight scene in 1 is fantastic.Did you even watch Shrek 2?Kill yourself, shrek 2 is the best.
Nothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.
Quote from: The Lord Ruler on November 10, 2015, 02:36:29 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMShrek 1 was fantastic and the rest were all horrible cash grabs. Pretty absurd you guys prefer 2. It expands the lore and that's about it. Nothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.That damn fight scene in 1 is fantastic.Did you even watch Shrek 2?Kill yourself, shrek 2 is the best.YES I DID BITCH
Quote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMNothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.How can someone be this wrong
Quote from: Winy on November 10, 2015, 02:38:39 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMNothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.How can someone be this wrongHow can you be so wrong about my opinion. Shrek 2, and 3 and 4 for that matter, don't need to exist at all. They were made for $$$ and it shows.
Quote from: Mistanosejob on November 10, 2015, 02:41:08 PMQuote from: Winy on November 10, 2015, 02:38:39 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMNothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.How can someone be this wrongHow can you be so wrong about my opinion. Shrek 2, and 3 and 4 for that matter, don't need to exist at all. They were made for $$$ and it shows.Three and Four were unnecessary. I could honestly care less if Two was for money (Which really all movies are, so that doesn't matter), it's easily the funniest of the four films.
Quote from: Winy on November 10, 2015, 06:25:09 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on November 10, 2015, 02:41:08 PMQuote from: Winy on November 10, 2015, 02:38:39 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on November 09, 2015, 05:19:11 PMNothing memorable/no noteworthy scenes.How can someone be this wrongHow can you be so wrong about my opinion. Shrek 2, and 3 and 4 for that matter, don't need to exist at all. They were made for $$$ and it shows.Three and Four were unnecessary. I could honestly care less if Two was for money (Which really all movies are, so that doesn't matter), it's easily the funniest of the four films.Well I don't watch shrek for the laughs, I watch it for the story and the lore.So agree to disagree.