Let's put it this way. I was super high when I saw it. Usually when I'm high at the cinema, even if the movie is fairly bad, I'll still enjoy simply being there to take it in on the big screen. Remember that forgettable Tom Cruise movie, Oblivion? I enjoyed watching that. Which makes it better than Superman vs Batman. As soon as it opened with an absolutely godawful rendition of the Batman origin myth I knew the whole thing would be shit. It honestly gave me a headache to finish watching this movie. There are too many faults to list.

And you know what? It shattered the 'super-hero-movie-high' I didn't even realise I had going. Ever since TDK, TDKR and Guardians of the Galaxy I've more-or-less unconsciously been so much more engaged by super hero movies. It makes me feel nauseous to think that I could have had anything in common with someone who would get excited looking at those super hero movie release-date-by-year calender's. The malignant culture of entertainment.

In the end it's Batman vs Superman vs Real Life, and reality wins.

Yeah. That 2 and a half minute opening montage of the Batman origin story that happens to be one of the coolest shot scenes in the movie must have been so hard to sit through.

Also, put a spoiler tag.

the title is basically a spoiler alert

You'd think superman would punch batman once and the movie would be over

Don't worry, Batman v Superman 3 comes out at the end of the year. It might be better.

It's a spoiler, how is this even a conversation?

Thank you.

Quote from: Saint Endo on March 25, 2016, 04:01:44 PM

the title is basically a spoiler alert

Stupid argument. If it's there, use it.

I'd hate to have an anticipated movie, no matter how shit, be ruined by the ramblings of druggie who couldn't be assed.

Shut the FUCK up

Maybe if everyone on here were as fucking slow as you, then yeah, we would have to use the spoiler tag.

cunt

You'd think superman would punch batman once and the movie would be over

if you're retarded

Quote from: Saint Endo on March 25, 2016, 04:42:48 PM

Shut the FUCK up

Maybe if everyone on here were as fucking slow as you, then yeah, we would have to use the spoiler tag.

cunt

Yeah! Fuck common decency.

Quote from: Saint Endo on March 25, 2016, 04:01:44 PM

the title is basically a spoiler alert

Stupid argument. If it's there, use it.

I'd hate to have an anticipated movie, no matter how shit, be ruined by the ramblings of druggie who couldn't be assed.

nigger

Quote from: Saint Endo on March 25, 2016, 04:49:49 PM

nigger

I don't see your point. This man routinely sees movies high.

fucking dc shills

Quote from: Saint Endo on March 25, 2016, 04:01:44 PM

the title is basically a spoiler alert

Stupid argument. If it's there, use it.

I'd hate to have an anticipated movie, no matter how shit, be ruined by the ramblings of druggie who couldn't be assed.

How's that a stupid argument? Anybody who takes the time to read the title is going to know the thread is either going to be a review or be talking about the movie. Why do you need a spoiler tag to know the thread is going to be about the movie when the title is implying it?

How's that a stupid argument? Anybody who takes the time to read the title is going to know the thread is either going to be a review or be talking about the movie. Why do you need a spoiler tag to know the thread is going to be about the movie when the title is implying it?

Because we can discuss the quality of the movie without using spoilers? There are spoiler discussions and spoiler-free discussion -- my AMA on Tuesday was the latter.

If there was a spoiler tag, then someone knows that there are spoilers in the thread. If I'm looking for a discussion on the film's quality before I go see it, for whatever reason, the lack of spoiler tag should imply that it's a safe zone to do so.

Ultimately, it's a matter of common courtesy. How hard is it to spoiler your posts or use the tag? Seriously, it's mind-boggling to me that this is even a conversation.

Quote from: Azumarill on March 25, 2016, 04:53:49 PM

clearly dont understand batman or precedent for conflicts like this in other media.

It is a dumb idea because there isn't a single scenario where Batman could feasibly beat Superman in a fair fight. There aren't many, or any canon (iirc) fights where Batman actually defeats Superman.

Pretty much any of those fights also include the caveat that Superman holds back to prevent killing him, and some iterations have begun scaling back Superman's powers.

Exactly. So this idea that the common man thinking the idea is stupid is not entirely baseless. It is stupid.

Yeah, I tend to agree, and IMO it devalues Batman as an interesting hero for having no powers by making him basically unbeatable.