Quote from: Dr. Jan itor on October 21, 2014, 09:02:05 PM

Quote from: Camnator on October 21, 2014, 08:59:40 PM

Quote from: Dr. Jan itor on October 21, 2014, 08:56:20 PM

Quote from: Camnator on October 21, 2014, 08:55:12 PM

Quote from: Dr. Jan itor on October 21, 2014, 08:50:48 PM

No credibility. It blatantly lied and said cannabis is addictive. That is incredibly wrong. Stop buying government propaganda.

It gets taught in Psychiatric residency. I learned this in med school, it is a fact. Weed hijacks the same striatal dopamine pathways that other addictive drugs hijack. They are developing medicine to treat cannabis addiction, whether you like it or not.

That is a psychological addiction, not physical one. That is caused by the user's own mind and could just as easily happen with food or sex. Cannabis is not physically addictive like alcohol, it does not cause withdrawals, it is used to tread actual addictions. That is the fact.

Nope its phsyical. The DSM 5, the medical manual psychiatrists use to treat addiction and mental health disorders, explicitly states cannabis withdrawal is physical.

If you are a psychiatrist and say it is only psychological, you can lose your license to practise medicine.

If you think the doctors and scientists are wrong, become president of the American Psychiatric Association and rewrite the DSM 5.


First, you must put down the joint Camnator, and become a doctor.

And anyone who claims it is physical is wrong, as it has been debunked countless times. I don't use joints, especially when rolled with tobacco. I'm apathetic to what corrupt governments and doctors claim. It's why they have been proven wrong and legalization is GOING to happen. No matter what they falsely claim.

Yeah?  I recently used the DSM 5 to diagnose cannabis addiction in a 18 year old psychotic patient.

If I went full Camnator, and said it was psychological, I would be in trouble.



The federal government personally told the delegation, if their risk benefit analysis shows marijuana legalization is wrong, they will send the DEA to shut everything down.


Deal with it.

Quote from: RomanGladiator on October 21, 2014, 01:04:26 PM

The long-term effect of smoking marijuana consistently: Working at K-Mart for 25 years.

I made more than most people could ever hope for.

On topic, only complete fools support prohibition of drugs. cannabis is both harmless and beneficial. It freaking cures cancer. Case closed.

Weed contains 50-70 percent more carcinogens than tobacco and 4 times the amount of tar, you stoner.

Where's Camnator when you need him?

Quote from: Dr. Jan itor on October 21, 2014, 09:14:50 PM

Quote from: Camnator on October 21, 2014, 08:38:23 PM

Quote from: RomanGladiator on October 21, 2014, 01:04:26 PM

The long-term effect of smoking marijuana consistently: Working at K-Mart for 25 years.

I made more than most people could ever hope for.

On topic, only complete fools support prohibition of drugs. cannabis is both harmless and beneficial. It freaking cures cancer. Case closed.

Weed contains 50-70 percent more carcinogens than tobacco and 4 times the amount of tar, you stoner.

It still doesn't cause cancer and only cures it. Vaporizing or eating has no tar, and unlike cigarette tar, cannabis tar is easily coughed out, not to mention not smoked nearly as often.

Game just started!

I know oncologists, they only give their patients marinol--synthetic non smokeable THC.  Vaporizing cannabis still contains carcinogens, they did studies on this.


Because cannabis has carcinogens, any oncologist who prescribes smoked marijuana to a patient is looked down upon, I can attest to this with personal experience.