Negroes
QuoteNegroesbruh
Another question is, Would whites be better off if we hadn't brought Afircans over here to be slaves?
Quote from: PSU on January 21, 2015, 12:35:10 PMAnother question is, Would whites be better off if we hadn't brought Afircans over here to be slaves?Depends on which group of whites you're looking at.White Americans? Spaniards? Brits? Much worse off.White Swedes, Ukrainians, etc? Probably not.
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on January 21, 2015, 12:32:52 PMQuoteNegroesbruhFuck you. If you think it's racist then so is "Caucasian" and "Oriental".
Negro
The forensically correct terms are Caucasian, Negroid, and Mongoloid.
It's not racist (as I know it's not your intent) as much as it is a faux pas. Same with 'oriental'.
Quote from: SuperIrish on January 21, 2015, 05:18:02 PMI don't think so.Much of the advantages (or disadvantages depending how you see it) came from the colonisation of Africa/the Caribbean, although they didn't exactly get the direct benefits until they had left.On the one hand, they had no control over their own country and were essentially prisoners of their own home, but on the other hand they benefited from the colonisation as the colonists had to provide (or get the locals to construct) infrastructure such as roads, communications, all that, which when under rule and after liberation got the use of. Compare that to Ethiopia and Liberia which were never colonised, they lack in that respect.I'm not colonisation or slavery was a good thing, but I fail to see overall how they would have been better off on their own by today.Is this what Europeans are taught in school? LOLThe colonization of Africa was objectively bad and it turned their societies back hundreds of years.
I don't think so.Much of the advantages (or disadvantages depending how you see it) came from the colonisation of Africa/the Caribbean, although they didn't exactly get the direct benefits until they had left.On the one hand, they had no control over their own country and were essentially prisoners of their own home, but on the other hand they benefited from the colonisation as the colonists had to provide (or get the locals to construct) infrastructure such as roads, communications, all that, which when under rule and after liberation got the use of. Compare that to Ethiopia and Liberia which were never colonised, they lack in that respect.I'm not colonisation or slavery was a good thing, but I fail to see overall how they would have been better off on their own by today.
No. They would most likely be stuck in Africa. Another question is, Would whites be better off if we hadn't brought Afircans over here to be slaves?
Would Negroes be better off if slavery had never existed?
