Better than the UN.
Quote from: SecondClass on March 30, 2015, 07:18:52 PMBetter than the UN.More like not comparable to the UN, since the only thing the UN has the power to do is to bitch and whine.
inb4 jidf shill flee
Oh! Also, the cunts outlawed menthols.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:38:51 PMOh! Also, the cunts outlawed menthols.Remember meta. Be a minty flavored cigarette drug lord.
Quote from: Sandtrap on March 30, 2015, 07:43:32 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:38:51 PMOh! Also, the cunts outlawed menthols.Remember meta. Be a minty flavored cigarette drug lord.I'll be a British version of Walter White. But instead of Blue Sky. . . Green Leaves. Yes. I like it.
what are the positives of being part of the EU?
Quote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.
Quote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.
Quote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.
Literally no European Union whatsoeverCan you imagine the chaos?
Also, I'm not sure if increasing legislative powers of the EU Parliament=more sound overall financial system. The problem lies elsewhere when we examine the financial crisis.
Quote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:29:58 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.
lol
Quote from: GethKhilafah on March 30, 2015, 08:34:15 PMlolHe isn't wrong. The US has essentially been subsidising European defence since the Cold War.
Quote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:33:26 PMQuote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:29:58 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean. None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own, but the threat of US intervention is enough to keep Putin out. NATO works in that sense, but the idea is supposed to be collective defense, not Daddy USA beating up whoever fucks with poor little Lithuania or Slovakia. NATO members should be pulling their own weight, or at least making an effort to. Generally, though, they are not, and the expectation seems to be for the World Police to swoop in and save the day.
None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own,
Quote from: GethKhilafah on March 30, 2015, 08:42:13 PMQuote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:39:46 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:33:26 PMQuote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:29:58 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean. None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own, but the threat of US intervention is enough to keep Putin out. NATO works in that sense, but the idea is supposed to be collective defense, not Daddy USA beating up whoever fucks with poor little Lithuania or Slovakia. NATO members should be pulling their own weight, or at least making an effort to. Generally, though, they are not, and the expectation seems to be for the World Police to swoop in and save the day.Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.I'm really not happy to see my tax dollars going to protect some irrelevant European backwater full of cucks too pussified to pay for their own defense. The US wouldn't need to spend such a fuckhueg amount on defense if it's supposed allies would stop leeching off of it.
Quote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:39:46 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:33:26 PMQuote from: Arm The Mob on March 30, 2015, 08:29:58 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: S\ash on March 30, 2015, 08:02:06 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on March 30, 2015, 07:53:33 PMQuote from: gats on March 30, 2015, 07:51:07 PMwhat are the positives of being part of the EU? standing as a united bloc against the likes of Russia.I don't see how you list that as a positive when NATO exists for that purpose.Which is one of the reasons it's not substantial enough for me to think it game-changing. I'd rather see NATO strengthened.NATO is a fucking joke right now, and will remain so until some mechanism is developed to penalize members who are not meeting their obligations.A very unsettling number of members are spending less than the required 2% of their GDP on defense. I think only like four of them actually met that requirement in 2013- The US, UK, Estonia, and fucking Greece.Europeans are happy to accuse Americans of war-mongering and dick-waving, with our troops based in so many peaceful European countries, but the sad truth is America is basically doing all of the heavy lifting.If it wasn't for NATO Russia would have steamrolled eastern Europe again by now.If it wasn't for the US and Article 5, you mean. None of the European NATO countries except for France and the UK are powerful enough to make invasion a bad idea on their own, but the threat of US intervention is enough to keep Putin out. NATO works in that sense, but the idea is supposed to be collective defense, not Daddy USA beating up whoever fucks with poor little Lithuania or Slovakia. NATO members should be pulling their own weight, or at least making an effort to. Generally, though, they are not, and the expectation seems to be for the World Police to swoop in and save the day.Well, yeah. I don't see how that's a problem. The US gets an excuse to spend more sums of money on their military and defense like how they always love to, and Europe doesn't have to spend as much on their military. So it's a win-win relationship.