Quote from: Kinder on November 17, 2014, 10:15:05 PMOh, it has an effect but to put it as the sole and biggest reason is absurdLet me share something with you.This was a map, done in the 1950's, of the various ethnic groups and tribes in Africa. Each colored blot is a separate group. Today, it's actually believed this image understates the sheer number of various groups, and that the total amount is much higher.These are groups that, historically, likely disagreed with each other. Groups that were at war and should have NEVER been grouped in one nation (You can see the modern lines in black on the image), were suddenly thrown together without a care in the world from the European governments as to who they grouped, or what the fuck their history is.Add, on top of this, the sheer destruction and chaos the Europeans brought in with their "colonization". As I said earlier, a prime example is the Congo, where the Belgian colonizers, under the rule of King Leopold, executed millions and cut off hundred of thousands, if not millions, of hands from native people who refused to assist in the rubber collecting, or just did not do it fast enough.Guess what? These atrocities occurred across much of the continent, under most of the colonizers. They did not give a fuck what they did or who they harmed. Yes, this happened across the globe under exploration and colonization, but it was exponentially worse in Africa. Going back to the Congo, when the Belgians packed up and left in the 1950's, out of millions of citizens, only roughly 20-25 had the equivalent of a college education. So, you can say "Oh, the Europeans had some negative effects, but it was far from the majority!" all you want, but history does not lie. The Europeans took a continent that, yes, was behind, and destroyed it, pillaged it for resources, and left it in chaos. The civil wars and strife that we see today, all remnants of idiocy that came during colonization.
Oh, it has an effect but to put it as the sole and biggest reason is absurd
Quote from: Meta Cognition on November 18, 2014, 09:51:22 AMI have to disagree challeger. The social impacts of colonialism were horrible but, more often than not, the economic, technological and medicinal gains made up for it.Shit, the wheel didn't exist in some parts of Africa as late as the 1800s.listen here u cheeky kuntThey (the europoors) could have gone to Africa and shared technology and conducted fair trade. Not steal everything and murder countless Africans.
I have to disagree challeger. The social impacts of colonialism were horrible but, more often than not, the economic, technological and medicinal gains made up for it.Shit, the wheel didn't exist in some parts of Africa as late as the 1800s.